Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.
Identifieur interne : 001C73 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001C72; suivant : 001C74Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.
Auteurs : Josef M. Schmidbauer ; Qun Peng ; David J. Apple ; Suresh K. Pandey ; Marcela Escobar-Gomez ; Gerd U. Auffarth ; Liliana Werner ; Luis G. VargasSource :
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2002.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Polymethyl Methacrylate, Silicone Elastomers.
- statistics & numerical data : Device Removal.
- Humans, Incidence, Intraoperative Complications, Lenses, Intraocular, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Risk Factors.
Abstract
To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (IOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design.
PubMed: 12106732
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12106732Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.</title><author><name sortKey="Schmidbauer, Josef M" sort="Schmidbauer, Josef M" uniqKey="Schmidbauer J" first="Josef M" last="Schmidbauer">Josef M. Schmidbauer</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5536, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peng, Qun" sort="Peng, Qun" uniqKey="Peng Q" first="Qun" last="Peng">Qun Peng</name></author><author><name sortKey="Apple, David J" sort="Apple, David J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="David J" last="Apple">David J. Apple</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pandey, Suresh K" sort="Pandey, Suresh K" uniqKey="Pandey S" first="Suresh K" last="Pandey">Suresh K. Pandey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" sort="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" uniqKey="Escobar Gomez M" first="Marcela" last="Escobar-Gomez">Marcela Escobar-Gomez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U" last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name></author><author><name sortKey="Werner, Liliana" sort="Werner, Liliana" uniqKey="Werner L" first="Liliana" last="Werner">Liliana Werner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vargas, Luis G" sort="Vargas, Luis G" uniqKey="Vargas L" first="Luis G" last="Vargas">Luis G. Vargas</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2002">2002</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:12106732</idno><idno type="pmid">12106732</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001C73</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.</title><author><name sortKey="Schmidbauer, Josef M" sort="Schmidbauer, Josef M" uniqKey="Schmidbauer J" first="Josef M" last="Schmidbauer">Josef M. Schmidbauer</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5536, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peng, Qun" sort="Peng, Qun" uniqKey="Peng Q" first="Qun" last="Peng">Qun Peng</name></author><author><name sortKey="Apple, David J" sort="Apple, David J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="David J" last="Apple">David J. Apple</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pandey, Suresh K" sort="Pandey, Suresh K" uniqKey="Pandey S" first="Suresh K" last="Pandey">Suresh K. Pandey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" sort="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" uniqKey="Escobar Gomez M" first="Marcela" last="Escobar-Gomez">Marcela Escobar-Gomez</name></author><author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U" last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name></author><author><name sortKey="Werner, Liliana" sort="Werner, Liliana" uniqKey="Werner L" first="Liliana" last="Werner">Liliana Werner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vargas, Luis G" sort="Vargas, Luis G" uniqKey="Vargas L" first="Luis G" last="Vargas">Luis G. Vargas</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><date when="2002" type="published">2002</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Device Removal (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Prosthesis Failure</term><term>Risk Factors</term><term>Silicone Elastomers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Silicone Elastomers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Device Removal</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Prosthesis Failure</term><term>Risk Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (IOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">12106732</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2002</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2002</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0886-3350</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>28</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>2002</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Cataract Refract Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1223-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (IOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable IOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1%) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA IOLs.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable IOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other IOLs.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schmidbauer</LastName><ForeName>Josef M</ForeName><Initials>JM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5536, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Peng</LastName><ForeName>Qun</ForeName><Initials>Q</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Apple</LastName><ForeName>David J</ForeName><Initials>DJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pandey</LastName><ForeName>Suresh K</ForeName><Initials>SK</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Escobar-Gomez</LastName><ForeName>Marcela</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Auffarth</LastName><ForeName>Gerd U</ForeName><Initials>GU</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Werner</LastName><ForeName>Liliana</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vargas</LastName><ForeName>Luis G</ForeName><Initials>LG</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Cataract Refract Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8604171</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0886-3350</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012826">Silicone Elastomers</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>9011-14-7</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D019904">Polymethyl Methacrylate</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D020878">Device Removal</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000706">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015994">Incidence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007431">Intraoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019904">Polymethyl Methacrylate</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011474">Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D011475">Prosthesis Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012307">Risk Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012826">Silicone Elastomers</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12106732</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0886335002012154</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C73 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001C73 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:12106732
|texte= Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12106732" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |