Effect of the hydrophilicity of acrylic intraocular lens material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification.
Identifieur interne : 001733 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001732; suivant : 001734Effect of the hydrophilicity of acrylic intraocular lens material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification.
Auteurs : Lorenz Vock ; Michael Georgopoulos ; Thomas Neumayer ; Wolf Buehl ; Oliver FindlSource :
- The British journal of ophthalmology [ 0007-1161 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylates, Acrylic Resins, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cataract (etiology), Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology), Lens Implantation, Intraocular (methods), Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Phacoemulsification, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Recurrence, Refractive Errors (etiology), Water.
- MESH :
- chemical : Acrylates, Acrylic Resins, Water.
- etiology : Cataract, Refractive Errors.
- methods : Lens Implantation, Intraocular.
- pathology : Lens Capsule, Crystalline.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Phacoemulsification, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Recurrence.
Abstract
To evaluate the influence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification (ACO).
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.103390
PubMed: 17108011
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17108011Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of the hydrophilicity of acrylic intraocular lens material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification.</title><author><name sortKey="Vock, Lorenz" sort="Vock, Lorenz" uniqKey="Vock L" first="Lorenz" last="Vock">Lorenz Vock</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien, Austria. lorenz.vock@meduniwien.ac.at</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Georgopoulos, Michael" sort="Georgopoulos, Michael" uniqKey="Georgopoulos M" first="Michael" last="Georgopoulos">Michael Georgopoulos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Neumayer, Thomas" sort="Neumayer, Thomas" uniqKey="Neumayer T" first="Thomas" last="Neumayer">Thomas Neumayer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1136/bjo.2006.103390</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17108011</idno><idno type="pmid">17108011</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001733</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effect of the hydrophilicity of acrylic intraocular lens material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification.</title><author><name sortKey="Vock, Lorenz" sort="Vock, Lorenz" uniqKey="Vock L" first="Lorenz" last="Vock">Lorenz Vock</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien, Austria. lorenz.vock@meduniwien.ac.at</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Georgopoulos, Michael" sort="Georgopoulos, Michael" uniqKey="Georgopoulos M" first="Michael" last="Georgopoulos">Michael Georgopoulos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Neumayer, Thomas" sort="Neumayer, Thomas" uniqKey="Neumayer T" first="Thomas" last="Neumayer">Thomas Neumayer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The British journal of ophthalmology</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1161</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylates</term><term>Acrylic Resins</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cataract (etiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</term><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology)</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular (methods)</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Recurrence</term><term>Refractive Errors (etiology)</term><term>Water</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylates</term><term>Acrylic Resins</term><term>Water</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract</term><term>Refractive Errors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Recurrence</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To evaluate the influence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification (ACO).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">17108011</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>01</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0007-1161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>91</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The British journal of ophthalmology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Br J Ophthalmol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effect of the hydrophilicity of acrylic intraocular lens material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>476-80</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="AIM" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate the influence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic acrylic material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification (ACO).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Prospective study on 53 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. Patients underwent standard cataract surgery by the same surgeon and randomly received a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) in one eye and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL in the other eye. Forty five of these patients completed the one-year follow-up. The following parameters were assessed: decentration, buttonholing, anterolenticular gap (ALG), ACO, outgrowth and refractive outcome.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">At the one-year follow-up, ACO was seen in 80% of the hydrophilic and 100% of the hydrophobic IOLs. ACO was more intense in the hydrophobic IOLs (p<0.001). Outgrowth was seen in 42% of the hydrophilic and 2% of the hydrophobic IOLs (p = 0.0003). No case of persisting ALG was seen in the hydrophobic IOLs, but in 42% of the hydrophilic IOLs. The refractive outcome was -0.29 (SD 0.56) dioptres for the hydrophilic and 0.003 (SD 0.44) dioptres for the hydrophobic IOLs (p<0.001).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">These results suggest that there is less ACO in hydrophilic acrylic than in hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. Although material properties might play a role, the angulated haptics of the hydrophilic IOLs exert an additional effect by the persisting ALG and a lack of contact between the IOL and the anterior capsule.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vock</LastName><ForeName>Lorenz</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien, Austria. lorenz.vock@meduniwien.ac.at</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Georgopoulos</LastName><ForeName>Michael</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Neumayer</LastName><ForeName>Thomas</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Buehl</LastName><ForeName>Wolf</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Findl</LastName><ForeName>Oliver</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Br J Ophthalmol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0421041</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0007-1161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000179">Acrylates</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>059QF0KO0R</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014867">Water</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>WC487PR91H</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C035956">methyl acrylate</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Dec;25(12):1637-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10609209</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):1198-203</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12842690</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jan;30(1):45-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14967267</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jan;30(1):52-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14967268</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991 Jul;17(4):471-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1895224</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ophthalmic Surg. 1992 Feb;23(2):94-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1549302</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Jan;19(1):77-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8426328</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Sep;19(5):582-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8229711</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ophthalmic Surg. 1994 Jul;25(7):477-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7970522</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1995 May;206(5):293-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7609368</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):469-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8695571</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Jun;22(5):585-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8784631</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22 Suppl 1:764-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9279669</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ophthalmology. 1998 Jul;105(7):1239-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9663228</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Aug;24(8):1105-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9719971</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Sep;24(9):1216-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9768395</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Sep;24(9):1235-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9768399</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Sep;24(9):1275-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9768408</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Dec;82(12):1429-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9930277</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Mar;127(3):343-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10088748</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 May;27(5):734-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11377905</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jun;27(6):825-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11408126</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jun;27(6):850-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11408130</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ophthalmology. 2001 Sep;108(9):1675-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11535472</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;85(11):1294-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11673291</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Apr;28(4):644-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11955905</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jul;28(7):1141-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12106722</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Sep;28(9):1613-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12231321</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 May;29(5):955-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12781282</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ophthalmology. 2003 Oct;110(10):1935-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14522768</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000179">Acrylates</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000369">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002386">Cataract</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000209">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005500">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D057927">Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007903">Lens Capsule, Crystalline</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000473">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019654">Lens Implantation, Intraocular</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D018918">Phacoemulsification</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D011183">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011446">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011474">Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012008">Recurrence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012030">Refractive Errors</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000209">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014867">Water</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC1994770</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">bjo.2006.103390</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1136/bjo.2006.103390</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17108011</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC1994770</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001733 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001733 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17108011
|texte= Effect of the hydrophilicity of acrylic intraocular lens material and haptic angulation on anterior capsule opacification.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17108011" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |