Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Identifieur interne : 001678 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001677; suivant : 001679Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Auteurs : Sanne M B I. Botden ; Sonja N. Buzink ; Marlies P. Schijven ; Jack J. JakimowiczSource :
- World journal of surgery [ 0364-2313 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- education : General Surgery.
- methods : Education, Medical, Continuing.
- standards : Education, Medical, Continuing, Laparoscopy, Suture Techniques.
- Clinical Competence, Computer Simulation, Equipment Design, Humans, User-Computer Interface.
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging new modality for laparoscopic skills training; however, most simulators lack realistic haptic feedback. Augmented reality (AR) is a new laparoscopic simulation system offering a combination of physical objects and VR simulation. Laparoscopic instruments are used within an hybrid mannequin on tissue or objects while using video tracking. This study was designed to assess the difference in realism, haptic feedback, and didactic value between AR and VR laparoscopic simulation.
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y
PubMed: 17361356
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17361356Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.</title><author><name sortKey="Botden, Sanne M B I" sort="Botden, Sanne M B I" uniqKey="Botden S" first="Sanne M B I" last="Botden">Sanne M B I. Botden</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Buzink, Sonja N" sort="Buzink, Sonja N" uniqKey="Buzink S" first="Sonja N" last="Buzink">Sonja N. Buzink</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schijven, Marlies P" sort="Schijven, Marlies P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="Marlies P" last="Schijven">Marlies P. Schijven</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jakimowicz, Jack J" sort="Jakimowicz, Jack J" uniqKey="Jakimowicz J" first="Jack J" last="Jakimowicz">Jack J. Jakimowicz</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17361356</idno><idno type="pmid">17361356</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001678</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.</title><author><name sortKey="Botden, Sanne M B I" sort="Botden, Sanne M B I" uniqKey="Botden S" first="Sanne M B I" last="Botden">Sanne M B I. Botden</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Buzink, Sonja N" sort="Buzink, Sonja N" uniqKey="Buzink S" first="Sonja N" last="Buzink">Sonja N. Buzink</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schijven, Marlies P" sort="Schijven, Marlies P" uniqKey="Schijven M" first="Marlies P" last="Schijven">Marlies P. Schijven</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jakimowicz, Jack J" sort="Jakimowicz, Jack J" uniqKey="Jakimowicz J" first="Jack J" last="Jakimowicz">Jack J. Jakimowicz</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">World journal of surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0364-2313</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Education, Medical, Continuing (methods)</term><term>Education, Medical, Continuing (standards)</term><term>Equipment Design</term><term>General Surgery (education)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Laparoscopy (standards)</term><term>Suture Techniques (standards)</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="education" xml:lang="en"><term>General Surgery</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Education, Medical, Continuing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Education, Medical, Continuing</term><term>Laparoscopy</term><term>Suture Techniques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Equipment Design</term><term>Humans</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging new modality for laparoscopic skills training; however, most simulators lack realistic haptic feedback. Augmented reality (AR) is a new laparoscopic simulation system offering a combination of physical objects and VR simulation. Laparoscopic instruments are used within an hybrid mannequin on tissue or objects while using video tracking. This study was designed to assess the difference in realism, haptic feedback, and didactic value between AR and VR laparoscopic simulation.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">17361356</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0364-2313</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>31</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>World journal of surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>World J Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>764-72</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging new modality for laparoscopic skills training; however, most simulators lack realistic haptic feedback. Augmented reality (AR) is a new laparoscopic simulation system offering a combination of physical objects and VR simulation. Laparoscopic instruments are used within an hybrid mannequin on tissue or objects while using video tracking. This study was designed to assess the difference in realism, haptic feedback, and didactic value between AR and VR laparoscopic simulation.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The ProMIS AR and LapSim VR simulators were used in this study. The participants performed a basic skills task and a suturing task on both simulators, after which they filled out a questionnaire about their demographics and their opinion of both simulators scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The participants were allotted to 3 groups depending on their experience: experts, intermediates and novices. Significant differences were calculated with the paired t-test.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">There was general consensus in all groups that the ProMIS AR laparoscopic simulator is more realistic than the LapSim VR laparoscopic simulator in both the basic skills task (mean 4.22 resp. 2.18, P < 0.000) as well as the suturing task (mean 4.15 resp. 1.85, P < 0.000). The ProMIS is regarded as having better haptic feedback (mean 3.92 resp. 1.92, P < 0.000) and as being more useful for training surgical residents (mean 4.51 resp. 2.94, P < 0.000).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">In comparison with the VR simulator, the AR laparoscopic simulator was regarded by all participants as a better simulator for laparoscopic skills training on all tested features.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Botden</LastName><ForeName>Sanne M B I</ForeName><Initials>SM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Buzink</LastName><ForeName>Sonja N</ForeName><Initials>SN</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schijven</LastName><ForeName>Marlies P</ForeName><Initials>MP</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jakimowicz</LastName><ForeName>Jack J</ForeName><Initials>JJ</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>World J Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7704052</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0364-2313</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12368674</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1764-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12098029</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14760660</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:414-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15718770</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Chirurgia (Bucur). 2004 Nov-Dec;99(6):523-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15739670</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Comput Aided Surg. 2003;8(6):283-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15742665</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Surg. 2005 Jun;189(6):758-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15910733</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Comput Aided Surg. 2004;9(5):227-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16192064</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 Mar;19(3):401-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15624062</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):678-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15776208</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1227-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16025195</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1216-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16132335</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 Dec;19(12):1521-2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16247572</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 Dec;19(12):1523-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16252077</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Surg. 2006 Jan;191(1):28-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16399102</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:288-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16404064</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2006 Jun;20(6):900-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16738979</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>World J Gastroenterol. 2006 May 28;12(20):3219-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16718842</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002983">Clinical Competence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D003198">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004502">Education, Medical, Continuing</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000592">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004867">Equipment Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013502">General Surgery</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000193">education</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010535">Laparoscopy</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000592">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013536">Suture Techniques</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000592">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014584">User-Computer Interface</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC1913183</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17361356</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC1913183</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001678 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001678 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17361356
|texte= Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17361356" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |