Tool/tissue interaction feedback modalities in robot-assisted lump localization.
Identifieur interne : 001570 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001569; suivant : 001571Tool/tissue interaction feedback modalities in robot-assisted lump localization.
Auteurs : M. Tavakoli ; A. Aziminejad ; R V Patel ; M. MoallemSource :
- Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference [ 1557-170X ] ; 2006.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Providing a surgeon with information regarding contacts made between tools and tissue during robot-assisted interventions can improve task efficiency and reliability. It is hypothesized that various modalities of contact feedback have the potential to enhance performance in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment. In this paper, (kinesthetic) haptic feedback is compared with visual feedback of haptic information in terms of several performance metrics. Using a haptics-capable master-slave test-bed for endoscopic surgery, experiments involving a lump localization task are conducted and the performance of human subjects is compared for these two modalities of contact feedback. It is shown that the two feedback modalities result in comparable localization accuracies--an advantage of visual haptic feedback due to the lower system complexity required--while the task completion times are significantly shorter with haptic feedback.
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260672
PubMed: 17946205
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17946205Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Tool/tissue interaction feedback modalities in robot-assisted lump localization.</title><author><name sortKey="Tavakoli, M" sort="Tavakoli, M" uniqKey="Tavakoli M" first="M" last="Tavakoli">M. Tavakoli</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>London Health Sci. Centre, Canadian Surg. Technol. & Adv. Robotics, London, Ont.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aziminejad, A" sort="Aziminejad, A" uniqKey="Aziminejad A" first="A" last="Aziminejad">A. Aziminejad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Patel, R V" sort="Patel, R V" uniqKey="Patel R" first="R V" last="Patel">R V Patel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moallem, M" sort="Moallem, M" uniqKey="Moallem M" first="M" last="Moallem">M. Moallem</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="doi">10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260672</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17946205</idno><idno type="pmid">17946205</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001570</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Tool/tissue interaction feedback modalities in robot-assisted lump localization.</title><author><name sortKey="Tavakoli, M" sort="Tavakoli, M" uniqKey="Tavakoli M" first="M" last="Tavakoli">M. Tavakoli</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>London Health Sci. Centre, Canadian Surg. Technol. & Adv. Robotics, London, Ont.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Aziminejad, A" sort="Aziminejad, A" uniqKey="Aziminejad A" first="A" last="Aziminejad">A. Aziminejad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Patel, R V" sort="Patel, R V" uniqKey="Patel R" first="R V" last="Patel">R V Patel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moallem, M" sort="Moallem, M" uniqKey="Moallem M" first="M" last="Moallem">M. Moallem</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference</title><idno type="ISSN">1557-170X</idno><imprint><date when="2006" type="published">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Endoscopes</term><term>Endoscopy (methods)</term><term>Equipment Design</term><term>Feedback</term><term>Humans</term><term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Endoscopy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Endoscopes</term><term>Equipment Design</term><term>Feedback</term><term>Humans</term><term>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Providing a surgeon with information regarding contacts made between tools and tissue during robot-assisted interventions can improve task efficiency and reliability. It is hypothesized that various modalities of contact feedback have the potential to enhance performance in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment. In this paper, (kinesthetic) haptic feedback is compared with visual feedback of haptic information in terms of several performance metrics. Using a haptics-capable master-slave test-bed for endoscopic surgery, experiments involving a lump localization task are conducted and the performance of human subjects is compared for these two modalities of contact feedback. It is shown that the two feedback modalities result in comparable localization accuracies--an advantage of visual haptic feedback due to the lower system complexity required--while the task completion times are significantly shorter with haptic feedback.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">17946205</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2008</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1557-170X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>1</Volume><PubDate><Year>2006</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Tool/tissue interaction feedback modalities in robot-assisted lump localization.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>3854-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Providing a surgeon with information regarding contacts made between tools and tissue during robot-assisted interventions can improve task efficiency and reliability. It is hypothesized that various modalities of contact feedback have the potential to enhance performance in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment. In this paper, (kinesthetic) haptic feedback is compared with visual feedback of haptic information in terms of several performance metrics. Using a haptics-capable master-slave test-bed for endoscopic surgery, experiments involving a lump localization task are conducted and the performance of human subjects is compared for these two modalities of contact feedback. It is shown that the two feedback modalities result in comparable localization accuracies--an advantage of visual haptic feedback due to the lower system complexity required--while the task completion times are significantly shorter with haptic feedback.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tavakoli</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>London Health Sci. Centre, Canadian Surg. Technol. & Adv. Robotics, London, Ont.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Aziminejad</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Patel</LastName><ForeName>R V</ForeName><Initials>RV</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moallem</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101243413</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1557-170X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D019723">Endoscopes</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004724">Endoscopy</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004867">Equipment Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005246">Feedback</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019060">Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D025321">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014584">User-Computer Interface</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2008</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260672</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17946205</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001570 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001570 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17946205
|texte= Tool/tissue interaction feedback modalities in robot-assisted lump localization.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17946205" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |