HapticV1, PubMed, Corpus, bibRecord, 001127

Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.

Identifieur interne : 001127 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001126; suivant : 001128

Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.

Auteurs : Peter W. Battaglia ; Massimiliano Di Luca ; Marc O. Ernst ; Paul R. Schrater ; Tonja Machulla ; Daniel Kersten

Source :

PLoS computational biology [ 1553-7358 ] ; 2010.

RBID : pubmed:20221263

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Cues, Decision Making (physiology), Form Perception (physiology), Humans, Task Performance and Analysis, Touch (physiology), Vision, Binocular (physiology).
MESH :
- physiology : Decision Making, Form Perception, Touch, Vision, Binocular.
- Cues, Humans, Task Performance and Analysis.

Abstract

Perception is fundamentally underconstrained because different combinations of object properties can generate the same sensory information. To disambiguate sensory information into estimates of scene properties, our brains incorporate prior knowledge and additional "auxiliary" (i.e., not directly relevant to desired scene property) sensory information to constrain perceptual interpretations. For example, knowing the distance to an object helps in perceiving its size. The literature contains few demonstrations of the use of prior knowledge and auxiliary information in combined visual and haptic disambiguation and almost no examination of haptic disambiguation of vision beyond "bistable" stimuli. Previous studies have reported humans integrate multiple unambiguous sensations to perceive single, continuous object properties, like size or position. Here we test whether humans use visual and haptic information, individually and jointly, to disambiguate size from distance. We presented participants with a ball moving in depth with a changing diameter. Because no unambiguous distance information is available under monocular viewing, participants rely on prior assumptions about the ball's distance to disambiguate their -size percept. Presenting auxiliary binocular and/or haptic distance information augments participants' prior distance assumptions and improves their size judgment accuracy-though binocular cues were trusted more than haptic. Our results suggest both visual and haptic distance information disambiguate size perception, and we interpret these results in the context of probabilistic perceptual reasoning.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000697
PubMed: 20221263

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:20221263

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Battaglia, Peter W" sort="Battaglia, Peter W" uniqKey="Battaglia P" first="Peter W" last="Battaglia">Peter W. Battaglia</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America. pbatt@mit.edu</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Di Luca, Massimiliano" sort="Di Luca, Massimiliano" uniqKey="Di Luca M" first="Massimiliano" last="Di Luca">Massimiliano Di Luca</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ernst, Marc O" sort="Ernst, Marc O" uniqKey="Ernst M" first="Marc O" last="Ernst">Marc O. Ernst</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schrater, Paul R" sort="Schrater, Paul R" uniqKey="Schrater P" first="Paul R" last="Schrater">Paul R. Schrater</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Machulla, Tonja" sort="Machulla, Tonja" uniqKey="Machulla T" first="Tonja" last="Machulla">Tonja Machulla</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kersten, Daniel" sort="Kersten, Daniel" uniqKey="Kersten D" first="Daniel" last="Kersten">Daniel Kersten</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000697</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:20221263</idno>
<idno type="pmid">20221263</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001127</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Battaglia, Peter W" sort="Battaglia, Peter W" uniqKey="Battaglia P" first="Peter W" last="Battaglia">Peter W. Battaglia</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America. pbatt@mit.edu</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Di Luca, Massimiliano" sort="Di Luca, Massimiliano" uniqKey="Di Luca M" first="Massimiliano" last="Di Luca">Massimiliano Di Luca</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ernst, Marc O" sort="Ernst, Marc O" uniqKey="Ernst M" first="Marc O" last="Ernst">Marc O. Ernst</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schrater, Paul R" sort="Schrater, Paul R" uniqKey="Schrater P" first="Paul R" last="Schrater">Paul R. Schrater</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Machulla, Tonja" sort="Machulla, Tonja" uniqKey="Machulla T" first="Tonja" last="Machulla">Tonja Machulla</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kersten, Daniel" sort="Kersten, Daniel" uniqKey="Kersten D" first="Daniel" last="Kersten">Daniel Kersten</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">PLoS computational biology</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1553-7358</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cues</term>
<term>Decision Making (physiology)</term>
<term>Form Perception (physiology)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Task Performance and Analysis</term>
<term>Touch (physiology)</term>
<term>Vision, Binocular (physiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Form Perception</term>
<term>Touch</term>
<term>Vision, Binocular</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cues</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Task Performance and Analysis</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Perception is fundamentally underconstrained because different combinations of object properties can generate the same sensory information. To disambiguate sensory information into estimates of scene properties, our brains incorporate prior knowledge and additional "auxiliary" (i.e., not directly relevant to desired scene property) sensory information to constrain perceptual interpretations. For example, knowing the distance to an object helps in perceiving its size. The literature contains few demonstrations of the use of prior knowledge and auxiliary information in combined visual and haptic disambiguation and almost no examination of haptic disambiguation of vision beyond "bistable" stimuli. Previous studies have reported humans integrate multiple unambiguous sensations to perceive single, continuous object properties, like size or position. Here we test whether humans use visual and haptic information, individually and jointly, to disambiguate size from distance. We presented participants with a ball moving in depth with a changing diameter. Because no unambiguous distance information is available under monocular viewing, participants rely on prior assumptions about the ball's distance to disambiguate their -size percept. Presenting auxiliary binocular and/or haptic distance information augments participants' prior distance assumptions and improves their size judgment accuracy-though binocular cues were trusted more than haptic. Our results suggest both visual and haptic distance information disambiguate size perception, and we interpret these results in the context of probabilistic perceptual reasoning.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">20221263</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1553-7358</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>Mar</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PLoS computational biology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS Comput. Biol.</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>e1000697</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000697</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Perception is fundamentally underconstrained because different combinations of object properties can generate the same sensory information. To disambiguate sensory information into estimates of scene properties, our brains incorporate prior knowledge and additional "auxiliary" (i.e., not directly relevant to desired scene property) sensory information to constrain perceptual interpretations. For example, knowing the distance to an object helps in perceiving its size. The literature contains few demonstrations of the use of prior knowledge and auxiliary information in combined visual and haptic disambiguation and almost no examination of haptic disambiguation of vision beyond "bistable" stimuli. Previous studies have reported humans integrate multiple unambiguous sensations to perceive single, continuous object properties, like size or position. Here we test whether humans use visual and haptic information, individually and jointly, to disambiguate size from distance. We presented participants with a ball moving in depth with a changing diameter. Because no unambiguous distance information is available under monocular viewing, participants rely on prior assumptions about the ball's distance to disambiguate their -size percept. Presenting auxiliary binocular and/or haptic distance information augments participants' prior distance assumptions and improves their size judgment accuracy-though binocular cues were trusted more than haptic. Our results suggest both visual and haptic distance information disambiguate size perception, and we interpret these results in the context of probabilistic perceptual reasoning.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Battaglia</LastName>
<ForeName>Peter W</ForeName>
<Initials>PW</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America. pbatt@mit.edu</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Di Luca</LastName>
<ForeName>Massimiliano</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ernst</LastName>
<ForeName>Marc O</ForeName>
<Initials>MO</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schrater</LastName>
<ForeName>Paul R</ForeName>
<Initials>PR</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Machulla</LastName>
<ForeName>Tonja</ForeName>
<Initials>T</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kersten</LastName>
<ForeName>Daniel</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>05</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS Comput Biol</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101238922</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1553-734X</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1999;28(2):167-81</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10615458</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1999 Dec 23-30;402(6764):877-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10622251</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 2000;29(11):1385-91</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11219990</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2001 Jan 4;409(6816):85-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11343118</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2001 Sep;41(20):2653-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11520511</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cognition. 2001 Aug;81(1):B1-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11525484</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2001 Sep;18(9):2307-20</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11551065</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2001 Oct;41(23):3023-37</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11704240</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11800458</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11800459</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11807554</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jun;5(6):598-604</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12021763</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1627-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12446912</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2003 Mar 18;13(6):483-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12646130</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2003 Jul;14(4):340-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12807407</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003 Jul;20(7):1391-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12868643</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2539-58</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">13129541</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:271-304</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14744217</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 3;14(3):257-62</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14761661</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2004 Jun;15(6):397-402</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15147493</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1057-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15361877</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):201-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15460926</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1965 Dec;78(4):575-81</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5891397</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1966 Jun;79(2):234-41</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5915906</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1967 Jun;80(2):250-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">6055057</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1972 Dec;85(4):477-97</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4660703</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1988 May 5;333(6168):71-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3362210</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1991 May 16;351(6323):228-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2041568</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1994 Sep;34(17):2259-75</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7941420</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):389-412</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7892735</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1997 Jan 23;385(6614):308</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9002513</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1997;26(2):171-92</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9274752</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1355-64</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10085361</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 1999 Feb;2(2):186-90</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10195204</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1999 Mar;39(5):975-86</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10341949</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 1953 Jul;60(4):223-31</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">13089000</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Bull. 1961 Nov;58:491-514</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">13890453</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1963 Dec;76:537-53</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14082652</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1965 Mar;78:139-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14270419</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):162-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15050512</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Neurosci. 2004 Dec;27(12):712-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15541511</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroreport. 2005 Nov 28;16(17):1923-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16272880</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2006 Apr;9(4):578-85</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16547513</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2006;6(5):554-64</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16881788</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 7;273(1598):2159-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16901835</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(2):263-90</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17136526</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e943</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17895984</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neural Comput. 2007 Dec;19(12):3335-55</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17970656</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2007;7(5):7.1-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18217847</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2004 Dec 1;4(12):967-92</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15669906</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D003463">Cues</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003657">Decision Making</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005556">Form Perception</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D013647">Task Performance and Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015348">Vision, Binocular</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC2832682</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000697</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20221263</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2832682</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001127 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001127 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:20221263
   |texte=   Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:20221263" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.

Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki