Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Does temporal asynchrony affect multimodal curvature detection?

Identifieur interne : 001128 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001127; suivant : 001129

Does temporal asynchrony affect multimodal curvature detection?

Auteurs : Sara A. Winges ; Stephanie E. Eonta ; John F. Soechting

Source :

RBID : pubmed:20213147

English descriptors

Abstract

Multiple sensory modalities gather information about our surroundings to plan appropriate movements based on the properties of the environment and the objects within it. This study was designed to examine the sensitivity of visual and haptic information alone and together for detecting curvature. When both visual and haptic information were present, temporal delays in signal onset were used to determine the effect of asynchronous sensory information on the interference of vision on the haptic estimate of curvature. Even under the largest temporal delays where visual and haptic information were clearly disparate, the presentation of visual information influenced the haptic perception of curvature. The uncertainty associated with the unimodal vision condition was smaller than that in the unimodal haptic condition, regardless of whether the haptic information was procured actively or under robot assistance for curvature detection. When both visual and haptic information were available, the uncertainty was not reduced; it was equal to that of the unimodal haptic condition. The weighting of the visual and haptic information was highly variable across subjects with some subjects making judgments based largely on haptic information, while others tended to rely on visual information equally or to a larger extent than the haptic information.

DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2200-z
PubMed: 20213147

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:20213147

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Does temporal asynchrony affect multimodal curvature detection?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Winges, Sara A" sort="Winges, Sara A" uniqKey="Winges S" first="Sara A" last="Winges">Sara A. Winges</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. swinges@umn.edu</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eonta, Stephanie E" sort="Eonta, Stephanie E" uniqKey="Eonta S" first="Stephanie E" last="Eonta">Stephanie E. Eonta</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Soechting, John F" sort="Soechting, John F" uniqKey="Soechting J" first="John F" last="Soechting">John F. Soechting</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00221-010-2200-z</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:20213147</idno>
<idno type="pmid">20213147</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001128</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Does temporal asynchrony affect multimodal curvature detection?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Winges, Sara A" sort="Winges, Sara A" uniqKey="Winges S" first="Sara A" last="Winges">Sara A. Winges</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. swinges@umn.edu</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eonta, Stephanie E" sort="Eonta, Stephanie E" uniqKey="Eonta S" first="Stephanie E" last="Eonta">Stephanie E. Eonta</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Soechting, John F" sort="Soechting, John F" uniqKey="Soechting J" first="John F" last="Soechting">John F. Soechting</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Experimental brain research</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-1106</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010" type="published">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Judgment</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Photic Stimulation</term>
<term>Physical Stimulation</term>
<term>Psychophysics</term>
<term>Robotics</term>
<term>Signal Detection, Psychological</term>
<term>Task Performance and Analysis</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Touch Perception</term>
<term>Uncertainty</term>
<term>Visual Perception</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Judgment</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Photic Stimulation</term>
<term>Physical Stimulation</term>
<term>Psychophysics</term>
<term>Robotics</term>
<term>Signal Detection, Psychological</term>
<term>Task Performance and Analysis</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Touch Perception</term>
<term>Uncertainty</term>
<term>Visual Perception</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Multiple sensory modalities gather information about our surroundings to plan appropriate movements based on the properties of the environment and the objects within it. This study was designed to examine the sensitivity of visual and haptic information alone and together for detecting curvature. When both visual and haptic information were present, temporal delays in signal onset were used to determine the effect of asynchronous sensory information on the interference of vision on the haptic estimate of curvature. Even under the largest temporal delays where visual and haptic information were clearly disparate, the presentation of visual information influenced the haptic perception of curvature. The uncertainty associated with the unimodal vision condition was smaller than that in the unimodal haptic condition, regardless of whether the haptic information was procured actively or under robot assistance for curvature detection. When both visual and haptic information were available, the uncertainty was not reduced; it was equal to that of the unimodal haptic condition. The weighting of the visual and haptic information was highly variable across subjects with some subjects making judgments based largely on haptic information, while others tended to rely on visual information equally or to a larger extent than the haptic information.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE">
<PMID Version="1">20213147</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1106</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>203</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>May</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Experimental brain research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Exp Brain Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Does temporal asynchrony affect multimodal curvature detection?</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>1-9</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00221-010-2200-z</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Multiple sensory modalities gather information about our surroundings to plan appropriate movements based on the properties of the environment and the objects within it. This study was designed to examine the sensitivity of visual and haptic information alone and together for detecting curvature. When both visual and haptic information were present, temporal delays in signal onset were used to determine the effect of asynchronous sensory information on the interference of vision on the haptic estimate of curvature. Even under the largest temporal delays where visual and haptic information were clearly disparate, the presentation of visual information influenced the haptic perception of curvature. The uncertainty associated with the unimodal vision condition was smaller than that in the unimodal haptic condition, regardless of whether the haptic information was procured actively or under robot assistance for curvature detection. When both visual and haptic information were available, the uncertainty was not reduced; it was equal to that of the unimodal haptic condition. The weighting of the visual and haptic information was highly variable across subjects with some subjects making judgments based largely on haptic information, while others tended to rely on visual information equally or to a larger extent than the haptic information.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Winges</LastName>
<ForeName>Sara A</ForeName>
<Initials>SA</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. swinges@umn.edu</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Eonta</LastName>
<ForeName>Stephanie E</ForeName>
<Initials>SE</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Soechting</LastName>
<ForeName>John F</ForeName>
<Initials>JF</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y">
<Grant>
<GrantID>NS-15018</GrantID>
<Acronym>NS</Acronym>
<Agency>NINDS NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 NS015018</GrantID>
<Acronym>NS</Acronym>
<Agency>NINDS NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 NS015018-28</GrantID>
<Acronym>NS</Acronym>
<Agency>NINDS NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Exp Brain Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0043312</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0014-4819</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11807554</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1998 Nov;123(1-2):124-35</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9835401</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2003 May;150(1):95-108</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12698221</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jul;127(2):213-23</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10442413</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jul;61(5):874-94</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10499001</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Surg Endosc. 2005 May;19(5):683-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15776211</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuron. 2006 Sep 7;51(5):651-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16950162</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(2):216-27</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17053907</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Perception. 2007;36(10):1431-43</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18265826</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(1):3-16</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18270873</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr;186(4):643-58</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18301885</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2625</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18612466</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):102-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19057225</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Science. 2004 Jan 16;303(5656):380-3</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14726593</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):265-79</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15477038</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1977 May;3(2):175-86</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">864391</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1982 May;31(5):446-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7110903</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 May;12(2):169-80</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2940321</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 1986 Sep;56(3):640-62</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3537225</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Neurosci. 1987 Oct;7(10):3215-29</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3668625</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 1995 Nov;74(5):2174-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8592205</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Vision Res. 1995 Sep;35(17):2503-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8594817</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1995;106(3):434-48</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8983987</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1996 Sep;111(2):253-61</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8891655</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Res. 2002 Feb;66(1):71-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11963280</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007600">Judgment</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010775">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010812">Physical Stimulation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011601">Psychophysics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D017603">Signal Detection, Psychological</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013647">Task Performance and Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013997">Time Factors</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D055698">Touch Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D035501">Uncertainty</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS279885</OtherID>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3159531</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>25</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>6</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00221-010-2200-z</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20213147</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3159531</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS279885</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001128 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001128 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:20213147
   |texte=   Does temporal asynchrony affect multimodal curvature detection?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:20213147" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024