A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words.
Identifieur interne : 000F04 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000F03; suivant : 000F05A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words.
Auteurs : Max Louwerse ; Louise ConnellSource :
- Cognitive science [ 1551-6709 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that object properties are processed faster when they follow properties from the same perceptual modality than properties from different modalities. These findings suggest that language activates sensorimotor processes, which, according to those studies, can only be explained by a modal account of cognition. The current paper shows how a statistical linguistic approach of word co-occurrences can also reliably predict the category of perceptual modality a word belongs to (auditory, olfactory-gustatory, visual-haptic), even though the statistical linguistic approach is less precise than the modal approach (auditory, gustatory, haptic, olfactory, visual). Moreover, the statistical linguistic approach is compared with the modal embodied approach in an experiment in which participants verify properties that share or shift modalities. Response times suggest that fast responses can best be explained by the linguistic account, whereas slower responses can best be explained by the embodied account. These results provide further evidence for the theory that conceptual processing is both linguistic and embodied, whereby less precise linguistic processes precede precise simulation processes.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x
PubMed: 21429005
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21429005Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words.</title><author><name sortKey="Louwerse, Max" sort="Louwerse, Max" uniqKey="Louwerse M" first="Max" last="Louwerse">Max Louwerse</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology/Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152, USA. mlouwerse@memphis.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Connell, Louise" sort="Connell, Louise" uniqKey="Connell L" first="Louise" last="Connell">Louise Connell</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21429005</idno><idno type="pmid">21429005</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F04</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words.</title><author><name sortKey="Louwerse, Max" sort="Louwerse, Max" uniqKey="Louwerse M" first="Max" last="Louwerse">Max Louwerse</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology/Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152, USA. mlouwerse@memphis.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Connell, Louise" sort="Connell, Louise" uniqKey="Connell L" first="Louise" last="Connell">Louise Connell</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Cognitive science</title><idno type="eISSN">1551-6709</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Algorithms</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Concept Formation</term><term>Humans</term><term>Linguistics (methods)</term><term>Models, Statistical</term><term>Perception</term><term>Psychological Theory</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Reaction Time</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Linguistics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Algorithms</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Concept Formation</term><term>Humans</term><term>Models, Statistical</term><term>Perception</term><term>Psychological Theory</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Reaction Time</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Previous studies have shown that object properties are processed faster when they follow properties from the same perceptual modality than properties from different modalities. These findings suggest that language activates sensorimotor processes, which, according to those studies, can only be explained by a modal account of cognition. The current paper shows how a statistical linguistic approach of word co-occurrences can also reliably predict the category of perceptual modality a word belongs to (auditory, olfactory-gustatory, visual-haptic), even though the statistical linguistic approach is less precise than the modal approach (auditory, gustatory, haptic, olfactory, visual). Moreover, the statistical linguistic approach is compared with the modal embodied approach in an experiment in which participants verify properties that share or shift modalities. Response times suggest that fast responses can best be explained by the linguistic account, whereas slower responses can best be explained by the embodied account. These results provide further evidence for the theory that conceptual processing is both linguistic and embodied, whereby less precise linguistic processes precede precise simulation processes.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">21429005</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2011</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>24</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1551-6709</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>35</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Cognitive science</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Cogn Sci</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>381-98</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Previous studies have shown that object properties are processed faster when they follow properties from the same perceptual modality than properties from different modalities. These findings suggest that language activates sensorimotor processes, which, according to those studies, can only be explained by a modal account of cognition. The current paper shows how a statistical linguistic approach of word co-occurrences can also reliably predict the category of perceptual modality a word belongs to (auditory, olfactory-gustatory, visual-haptic), even though the statistical linguistic approach is less precise than the modal approach (auditory, gustatory, haptic, olfactory, visual). Moreover, the statistical linguistic approach is compared with the modal embodied approach in an experiment in which participants verify properties that share or shift modalities. Response times suggest that fast responses can best be explained by the linguistic account, whereas slower responses can best be explained by the embodied account. These results provide further evidence for the theory that conceptual processing is both linguistic and embodied, whereby less precise linguistic processes precede precise simulation processes.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2010 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Louwerse</LastName><ForeName>Max</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology/Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152, USA. mlouwerse@memphis.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Connell</LastName><ForeName>Louise</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>09</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Cogn Sci</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7708195</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0364-0213</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000465">Algorithms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D003198">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D003210">Concept Formation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008037">Linguistics</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D015233">Models, Statistical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D010465">Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011582">Psychological Theory</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>9</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21429005</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F04 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F04 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21429005
|texte= A taste of words: linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21429005" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |