Touch influences visual perception with a tight orientation-tuning.
Identifieur interne : 000811 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000810; suivant : 000812Touch influences visual perception with a tight orientation-tuning.
Auteurs : Onno Van Der Groen ; Erik Van Der Burg ; Claudia Lunghi ; David AlaisSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Stimuli from different sensory modalities are thought to be processed initially in distinct unisensory brain areas prior to convergence in multisensory areas. However, signals in one modality can influence the processing of signals from other modalities and recent studies suggest this cross-modal influence may occur early on, even in 'unisensory' areas. Some recent psychophysical studies have shown specific cross-modal effects between touch and vision during binocular rivalry, but these cannot completely rule out a response bias. To test for genuine cross-modal integration of haptic and visual signals, we investigated whether congruent haptic input could influence visual contrast sensitivity compared to incongruent haptic input in three psychophysical experiments using a two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice method to eliminate response bias. The initial experiment demonstrated that contrast thresholds for a visual grating were lower when exploring a haptic grating that shared the same orientation compared to an orthogonal orientation. Two subsequent experiments mapped the orientation and spatial frequency tunings for the congruent haptic facilitation of vision, finding a clear orientation tuning effect but not a spatial frequency tuning. In addition to an increased contrast sensitivity for iso-oriented visual-haptic gratings, we found a significant loss of sensitivity for orthogonally oriented visual-haptic gratings. We conclude that the tactile influence on vision is a result of a tactile input to orientation-tuned visual areas.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079558
PubMed: 24244523
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24244523Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Touch influences visual perception with a tight orientation-tuning.</title><author><name sortKey="Van Der Groen, Onno" sort="Van Der Groen, Onno" uniqKey="Van Der Groen O" first="Onno" last="Van Der Groen">Onno Van Der Groen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Burg, Erik" sort="Van Der Burg, Erik" uniqKey="Van Der Burg E" first="Erik" last="Van Der Burg">Erik Van Der Burg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lunghi, Claudia" sort="Lunghi, Claudia" uniqKey="Lunghi C" first="Claudia" last="Lunghi">Claudia Lunghi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alais, David" sort="Alais, David" uniqKey="Alais D" first="David" last="Alais">David Alais</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0079558</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24244523</idno><idno type="pmid">24244523</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000811</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Touch influences visual perception with a tight orientation-tuning.</title><author><name sortKey="Van Der Groen, Onno" sort="Van Der Groen, Onno" uniqKey="Van Der Groen O" first="Onno" last="Van Der Groen">Onno Van Der Groen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Der Burg, Erik" sort="Van Der Burg, Erik" uniqKey="Van Der Burg E" first="Erik" last="Van Der Burg">Erik Van Der Burg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lunghi, Claudia" sort="Lunghi, Claudia" uniqKey="Lunghi C" first="Claudia" last="Lunghi">Claudia Lunghi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Alais, David" sort="Alais, David" uniqKey="Alais D" first="David" last="Alais">David Alais</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Orientation</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Touch</term><term>Visual Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Orientation</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Touch</term><term>Visual Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Stimuli from different sensory modalities are thought to be processed initially in distinct unisensory brain areas prior to convergence in multisensory areas. However, signals in one modality can influence the processing of signals from other modalities and recent studies suggest this cross-modal influence may occur early on, even in 'unisensory' areas. Some recent psychophysical studies have shown specific cross-modal effects between touch and vision during binocular rivalry, but these cannot completely rule out a response bias. To test for genuine cross-modal integration of haptic and visual signals, we investigated whether congruent haptic input could influence visual contrast sensitivity compared to incongruent haptic input in three psychophysical experiments using a two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice method to eliminate response bias. The initial experiment demonstrated that contrast thresholds for a visual grating were lower when exploring a haptic grating that shared the same orientation compared to an orthogonal orientation. Two subsequent experiments mapped the orientation and spatial frequency tunings for the congruent haptic facilitation of vision, finding a clear orientation tuning effect but not a spatial frequency tuning. In addition to an increased contrast sensitivity for iso-oriented visual-haptic gratings, we found a significant loss of sensitivity for orthogonally oriented visual-haptic gratings. We conclude that the tactile influence on vision is a result of a tactile input to orientation-tuned visual areas.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">24244523</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>22</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>8</Volume><Issue>11</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS ONE</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Touch influences visual perception with a tight orientation-tuning.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e79558</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0079558</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Stimuli from different sensory modalities are thought to be processed initially in distinct unisensory brain areas prior to convergence in multisensory areas. However, signals in one modality can influence the processing of signals from other modalities and recent studies suggest this cross-modal influence may occur early on, even in 'unisensory' areas. Some recent psychophysical studies have shown specific cross-modal effects between touch and vision during binocular rivalry, but these cannot completely rule out a response bias. To test for genuine cross-modal integration of haptic and visual signals, we investigated whether congruent haptic input could influence visual contrast sensitivity compared to incongruent haptic input in three psychophysical experiments using a two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice method to eliminate response bias. The initial experiment demonstrated that contrast thresholds for a visual grating were lower when exploring a haptic grating that shared the same orientation compared to an orthogonal orientation. Two subsequent experiments mapped the orientation and spatial frequency tunings for the congruent haptic facilitation of vision, finding a clear orientation tuning effect but not a spatial frequency tuning. In addition to an increased contrast sensitivity for iso-oriented visual-haptic gratings, we found a significant loss of sensitivity for orthogonally oriented visual-haptic gratings. We conclude that the tactile influence on vision is a result of a tactile input to orientation-tuned visual areas.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van der Groen</LastName><ForeName>Onno</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van der Burg</LastName><ForeName>Erik</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lunghi</LastName><ForeName>Claudia</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Alais</LastName><ForeName>David</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>14</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurosci Lett. 2004 Jan 2;354(1):22-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14698473</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2004 Mar;7(3):308-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14966522</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jul;88(1):540-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12091578</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;22(13):5749-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12097528</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Brain Res. 2002 Sep 20;135(1-2):127-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12356442</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2003 May 15;23(10):4005-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12764085</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Physiol. 1973 May;231(1):31-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">4715359</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 1982;22(5):545-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7112954</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Oct 22;216(1204):335-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6129633</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):113-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6844102</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 1992 Jul;68(1):144-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1517820</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1993 Sep 16;365(6443):250-2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8371779</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Physiol. 1995 Mar 15;483 ( Pt 3):797-810</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7776259</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):526-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8606771</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9176952</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9176953</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 1997 Nov 1;17(21):8621-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9334433</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroreport. 1997 Dec 22;8(18):3877-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9462459</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain. 1998 Mar;121 ( Pt 3):409-19</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9549517</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain. 1998 Jul;121 ( Pt 7):1213-29</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9679774</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1999 Oct 7;401(6753):587-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10524625</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14449617</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2005 Feb 3;45(3):469-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15694332</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Apr;46(3):279-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15772968</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroreport. 2005 Jul 13;16(10):1107-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15973157</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:377-401</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16022601</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):715-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16262466</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jun;10(6):278-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16713325</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Nov;10(11):502-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16997612</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2008 Jan 10;57(1):11-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18184561</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):505-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18327253</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3046</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18728773</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;19(7):635-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18727775</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1053-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18823194</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jan 23;450(1):60-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19013216</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 4;29(5):1565-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19193903</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):655-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19377473</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 1;47(1):384-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19332139</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1991-2000</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19732841</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1977-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19896540</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2010 Feb 23;20(4):R143-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20178754</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Seeing Perceiving. 2010;23(1):3-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20507725</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1208-18</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21195781</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS Biol. 2011 Apr;9(4):e1000608</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21483719</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2011 Oct;21(10):2307-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21368088</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25277</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21966478</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;106(5):2108-19</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21775720</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 24;32(43):14921-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23100415</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58754</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23472219</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 26;33(26):10616-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23804085</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:441-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10845071</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2000 Jun;26(3):703-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10896165</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychophysiology. 2000 Sep;37(5):697-705</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11037046</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Oct;26(5):1583-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11039486</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3(11):1153-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11036274</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2000 Dec 14;408(6814):788</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11130706</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2001 Aug 7;11(15):1188-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11516950</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Sep;2(9):635-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11533731</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Nov;14(3):186-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11559962</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2002 Apr;42(8):949-67</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11934448</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):389-400</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12030824</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Jun;14(1):187-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12063142</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):758-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12808458</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 20;23(20):7510-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12930789</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Oct;50(1-2):19-26</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14511833</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jan;154(2):238-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14504860</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D009949">Orientation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010775">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3828350</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="ecollection"><Year>2013</Year><Month></Month><Day></Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>24</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0079558</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-13-10693</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24244523</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3828350</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000811 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000811 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24244523
|texte= Touch influences visual perception with a tight orientation-tuning.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24244523" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |