Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.

Identifieur interne : 000682 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000681; suivant : 000683

Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.

Auteurs : Herbert Heuer ; Jenna Lüttgen

Source :

RBID : pubmed:24736860

English descriptors

Abstract

Haptic guidance has been shown to have both facilitatory and interfering effects on motor learning. Interfering effects have been hypothesized to result from the particular dynamic environment, which supports a passive role of the learner, and they should be attenuated by fading guidance. Facilitatory effects, in particular for dynamic movement characteristics, have been hypothesized to result from the high-quality information provided by haptic demonstration. If haptic demonstration provides particularly precise information about target movements, the motor system's need for such information should more likely increase in the course of motor learning, in which case growing guidance should be more beneficial for learning. We contrasted fading and growing guidance in the course of learning a spatio-temporal motor pattern. To stimulate an active role of the learner, practice trials consisted of three phases, a visual demonstration of the target movement, a guided reproduction, and a reproduction without haptic guidance. Performance was assessed in terms of variable duration errors, relative-timing errors, variable path-length errors, and shape errors. Motor learning with growing and fading guidance turned out to be largely equivalent, so that the notion of an increasing optimal precision of haptic demonstrations, which matches a demand of increasingly precise information on the target movement, found no support. Duration errors declined only with fading, but not with growing guidance. Relative timing revealed a benefit of immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but learning was not different between the two practice protocols. This contrast between absolute and relative timing adds to other evidence according to which acquisition of these two aspects of motor timing involves different learning mechanisms. Whereas relative timing gained from immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but revealed no practice-related improvement in the presence of haptic guidance, the opposite pattern of results was found for the shape error. This finding is consistent with the claim that haptic demonstration is particularly efficient with respect to relative timing, but not with respect to spatial movement characteristics.

DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3914-0
PubMed: 24736860

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:24736860

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Heuer, Herbert" sort="Heuer, Herbert" uniqKey="Heuer H" first="Herbert" last="Heuer">Herbert Heuer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>IfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany, Heuer@ifado.de.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Luttgen, Jenna" sort="Luttgen, Jenna" uniqKey="Luttgen J" first="Jenna" last="Lüttgen">Jenna Lüttgen</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00221-014-3914-0</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:24736860</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24736860</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000682</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Heuer, Herbert" sort="Heuer, Herbert" uniqKey="Heuer H" first="Herbert" last="Heuer">Herbert Heuer</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>IfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany, Heuer@ifado.de.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Luttgen, Jenna" sort="Luttgen, Jenna" uniqKey="Luttgen J" first="Jenna" last="Lüttgen">Jenna Lüttgen</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Experimental brain research</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-1106</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014" type="published">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Feedback, Sensory (physiology)</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Learning (physiology)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Movement (physiology)</term>
<term>Photic Stimulation</term>
<term>Robotics</term>
<term>Space Perception (physiology)</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Time Perception (physiology)</term>
<term>Touch (physiology)</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Feedback, Sensory</term>
<term>Learning</term>
<term>Movement</term>
<term>Space Perception</term>
<term>Time Perception</term>
<term>Touch</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Photic Stimulation</term>
<term>Robotics</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Haptic guidance has been shown to have both facilitatory and interfering effects on motor learning. Interfering effects have been hypothesized to result from the particular dynamic environment, which supports a passive role of the learner, and they should be attenuated by fading guidance. Facilitatory effects, in particular for dynamic movement characteristics, have been hypothesized to result from the high-quality information provided by haptic demonstration. If haptic demonstration provides particularly precise information about target movements, the motor system's need for such information should more likely increase in the course of motor learning, in which case growing guidance should be more beneficial for learning. We contrasted fading and growing guidance in the course of learning a spatio-temporal motor pattern. To stimulate an active role of the learner, practice trials consisted of three phases, a visual demonstration of the target movement, a guided reproduction, and a reproduction without haptic guidance. Performance was assessed in terms of variable duration errors, relative-timing errors, variable path-length errors, and shape errors. Motor learning with growing and fading guidance turned out to be largely equivalent, so that the notion of an increasing optimal precision of haptic demonstrations, which matches a demand of increasingly precise information on the target movement, found no support. Duration errors declined only with fading, but not with growing guidance. Relative timing revealed a benefit of immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but learning was not different between the two practice protocols. This contrast between absolute and relative timing adds to other evidence according to which acquisition of these two aspects of motor timing involves different learning mechanisms. Whereas relative timing gained from immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but revealed no practice-related improvement in the presence of haptic guidance, the opposite pattern of results was found for the shape error. This finding is consistent with the claim that haptic demonstration is particularly efficient with respect to relative timing, but not with respect to spatial movement characteristics.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE">
<PMID Version="1">24736860</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1106</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>232</Volume>
<Issue>7</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Experimental brain research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Exp Brain Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>2229-42</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00221-014-3914-0</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Haptic guidance has been shown to have both facilitatory and interfering effects on motor learning. Interfering effects have been hypothesized to result from the particular dynamic environment, which supports a passive role of the learner, and they should be attenuated by fading guidance. Facilitatory effects, in particular for dynamic movement characteristics, have been hypothesized to result from the high-quality information provided by haptic demonstration. If haptic demonstration provides particularly precise information about target movements, the motor system's need for such information should more likely increase in the course of motor learning, in which case growing guidance should be more beneficial for learning. We contrasted fading and growing guidance in the course of learning a spatio-temporal motor pattern. To stimulate an active role of the learner, practice trials consisted of three phases, a visual demonstration of the target movement, a guided reproduction, and a reproduction without haptic guidance. Performance was assessed in terms of variable duration errors, relative-timing errors, variable path-length errors, and shape errors. Motor learning with growing and fading guidance turned out to be largely equivalent, so that the notion of an increasing optimal precision of haptic demonstrations, which matches a demand of increasingly precise information on the target movement, found no support. Duration errors declined only with fading, but not with growing guidance. Relative timing revealed a benefit of immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but learning was not different between the two practice protocols. This contrast between absolute and relative timing adds to other evidence according to which acquisition of these two aspects of motor timing involves different learning mechanisms. Whereas relative timing gained from immediately preceding haptic demonstration, but revealed no practice-related improvement in the presence of haptic guidance, the opposite pattern of results was found for the shape error. This finding is consistent with the claim that haptic demonstration is particularly efficient with respect to relative timing, but not with respect to spatial movement characteristics.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Heuer</LastName>
<ForeName>Herbert</ForeName>
<Initials>H</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>IfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystraße 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany, Heuer@ifado.de.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Lüttgen</LastName>
<ForeName>Jenna</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Exp Brain Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0043312</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0014-4819</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000704">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D056228">Feedback, Sensory</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007858">Learning</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009068">Movement</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010775">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013028">Space Perception</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013997">Time Factors</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013998">Time Perception</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2013</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>7</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00221-014-3914-0</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24736860</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000682 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000682 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:24736860
   |texte=   Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24736860" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024