"Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching": Retraction of Förster (2011).
Identifieur interne : 000099 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000098; suivant : 000100"Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching": Retraction of Förster (2011).
Auteurs :Source :
- Journal of experimental psychology. General [ 1939-2222 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
Reports the retraction of "Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching" by Jens Förster (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011[Aug], Vol 140[3], 364-389). This retraction follows the results of an investigation by the University of Amsterdam into the work of Jens Förster. The University requested the retraction of this article based on its qualitative judgement of "strong statistical evidence for low veracity". (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2011-07335-001.) It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMOsys; Förster & Dannenberg, 2010). (PsycINFO Database Record
DOI: 10.1037/a0040144
PubMed: 26881990
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26881990Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">"Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching": Retraction of Förster (2011).</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="doi">10.1037/a0040144</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26881990</idno><idno type="pmid">26881990</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000099</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">"Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching": Retraction of Förster (2011).</title></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><idno type="eISSN">1939-2222</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Reports the retraction of "Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching" by Jens Förster (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011[Aug], Vol 140[3], 364-389). This retraction follows the results of an investigation by the University of Amsterdam into the work of Jens Förster. The University requested the retraction of this article based on its qualitative judgement of "strong statistical evidence for low veracity". (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2011-07335-001.) It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMOsys; Förster & Dannenberg, 2010). (PsycINFO Database Record</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="In-Data-Review"><PMID Version="1">26881990</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCreated><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1939-2222</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>145</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Exp Psychol Gen</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>"Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching": Retraction of Förster (2011).</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>272</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1037/a0040144</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Reports the retraction of "Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching" by Jens Förster (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011[Aug], Vol 140[3], 364-389). This retraction follows the results of an investigation by the University of Amsterdam into the work of Jens Förster. The University requested the retraction of this article based on its qualitative judgement of "strong statistical evidence for low veracity". (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2011-07335-001.) It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMOsys; Förster & Dannenberg, 2010). (PsycINFO Database Record</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Exp Psychol Gen</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7502587</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-1015</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">2016-07319-003</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1037/a0040144</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26881990</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000099 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000099 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26881990
|texte= "Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching": Retraction of Förster (2011).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26881990" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |