A retrospective analysis of five intra-ocular lenses and the predictive value of six different intra-ocular lens power calculation formulas.
Identifieur interne : 002458 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002457; suivant : 002459A retrospective analysis of five intra-ocular lenses and the predictive value of six different intra-ocular lens power calculation formulas.
Auteurs : Wieke Zuidervaart [Pays-Bas] ; Gregorius P M. LuytenSource :
- Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift für Augenheilkunde [ 0030-3755 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Algorithms, Biocompatible Materials, Female, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Optics and Photonics, Patient Satisfaction, Phacoemulsification, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Predictive Value of Tests, Refraction, Ocular (physiology), Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Visual Acuity (physiology).
- MESH :
- chemical : Biocompatible Materials, Polymethyl Methacrylate.
- physiology : Refraction, Ocular, Visual Acuity.
- Aged, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Optics and Photonics, Patient Satisfaction, Phacoemulsification, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies.
Abstract
To evaluate the refractive and visual outcome after implantation of five different lenses and to evaluate the accuracy of six different intra-ocular lens (IOL) power formulas.
DOI: 10.1159/000088384
PubMed: 16286801
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16286801Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A retrospective analysis of five intra-ocular lenses and the predictive value of six different intra-ocular lens power calculation formulas.</title><author><name sortKey="Zuidervaart, Wieke" sort="Zuidervaart, Wieke" uniqKey="Zuidervaart W" first="Wieke" last="Zuidervaart">Wieke Zuidervaart</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Leiden, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Leiden</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University Medical Centre Leiden</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Luyten, Gregorius P M" sort="Luyten, Gregorius P M" uniqKey="Luyten G" first="Gregorius P M" last="Luyten">Gregorius P M. Luyten</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2005 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="doi">10.1159/000088384</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16286801</idno><idno type="pmid">16286801</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001885</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001885</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002458</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A retrospective analysis of five intra-ocular lenses and the predictive value of six different intra-ocular lens power calculation formulas.</title><author><name sortKey="Zuidervaart, Wieke" sort="Zuidervaart, Wieke" uniqKey="Zuidervaart W" first="Wieke" last="Zuidervaart">Wieke Zuidervaart</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Leiden, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Leiden</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University Medical Centre Leiden</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Luyten, Gregorius P M" sort="Luyten, Gregorius P M" uniqKey="Luyten G" first="Gregorius P M" last="Luyten">Gregorius P M. Luyten</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift für Augenheilkunde</title><idno type="ISSN">0030-3755</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Algorithms</term><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Optics and Photonics</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term><term>Predictive Value of Tests</term><term>Refraction, Ocular (physiology)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Visual Acuity (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Polymethyl Methacrylate</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Refraction, Ocular</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Algorithms</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Optics and Photonics</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Predictive Value of Tests</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To evaluate the refractive and visual outcome after implantation of five different lenses and to evaluate the accuracy of six different intra-ocular lens (IOL) power formulas.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">16286801</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2005</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2008</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0030-3755</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>219</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2005 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift für Augenheilkunde</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ophthalmologica</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A retrospective analysis of five intra-ocular lenses and the predictive value of six different intra-ocular lens power calculation formulas.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>390-3</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate the refractive and visual outcome after implantation of five different lenses and to evaluate the accuracy of six different intra-ocular lens (IOL) power formulas.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">In total, 288 eyes had cataract surgery with implantation of a polymethylmethacrylate lens (Centra55B) or a foldable silicone lens (AMO SI40, Staar AA, Silens 5, Pliolens). The pre- and postoperative refraction and visual outcome were analysed for all lenses under study. Six different IOL power formulas have been used to compare the accuracy of the predictive refractive outcome.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The Staar Plate Haptic lens was found to have the best uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) compared to the Centra55B, AMO SI40 and the Pliolens. Based on the A constant given by the company, the Pliolens revealed a significant overcorrection and the Staar Plate Haptic lens an undercorrection. The achieved postoperative refraction minus the intended postoperative refraction caused significant myopia with the Pliolens and hyperopia with the Staar Plate Haptic lens. The SRK-T and the Holladay formulas give the best predictive lens calculations in relation to the axial length.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The A constant of all lenses has to be adjusted for our institute. Especially the AMO SI40, the Staar AA lens and the Silens 5 showed a remarkable difference compared to the A constant given by the company. All foldable lenses were comparable in their visual outcome. The significantly better UCVA of the Staar Plate Haptic lens can be explained by the emmetropic outcome of the postoperative refraction.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zuidervaart</LastName><ForeName>Wieke</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Leiden, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Luyten</LastName><ForeName>Gregorius P M</ForeName><Initials>GP</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Ophthalmologica</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0054655</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0030-3755</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D001672">Biocompatible Materials</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>9011-14-7</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D019904">Polymethyl Methacrylate</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D000465">Algorithms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001672">Biocompatible Materials</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D019654">Lens Implantation, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055095">Optics and Photonics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D017060">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D018918">Phacoemulsification</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019904">Polymethyl Methacrylate</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011237">Predictive Value of Tests</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012029">Refraction, Ocular</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015203">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012189">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014792">Visual Acuity</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2004</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2004</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>22</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">88384</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1159/000088384</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16286801</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Luyten, Gregorius P M" sort="Luyten, Gregorius P M" uniqKey="Luyten G" first="Gregorius P M" last="Luyten">Gregorius P M. Luyten</name></noCountry><country name="Pays-Bas"><noRegion><name sortKey="Zuidervaart, Wieke" sort="Zuidervaart, Wieke" uniqKey="Zuidervaart W" first="Wieke" last="Zuidervaart">Wieke Zuidervaart</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002458 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002458 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16286801
|texte= A retrospective analysis of five intra-ocular lenses and the predictive value of six different intra-ocular lens power calculation formulas.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16286801" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |