Dominance of touch by vision: generalization of the hypothesis to a tactually experienced population.
Identifieur interne : 002138 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002137; suivant : 002139Dominance of touch by vision: generalization of the hypothesis to a tactually experienced population.
Auteurs : R P Power ; A. GrahamSource :
- Perception [ 0301-0066 ] ; 1976.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
It is now held that in conditions where there is conflicting sensory information vision dominates touch. The present study was designed to place boundary conditions on the generality of the hypothesis by comparing the performance of tactually experienced subjects - potters - with university students on a form-perception task in which a square was optically distorted so as to appear rectangular. Subjects examined the square haptically and visually, and matched it by touch or vision. Although potters were more accurate than students when not permitted vision, tactual judgements of both were dominated by vision when they were presented with conflicting information. In a supplementary study longer, more active exploration and emphasis on the necessity of matching by touch had no differential effect. In a third study it was found that a range effect produced by the comparison stimuli could explain the lesser accuracy of the students when they were making haptic judgements. The generality of the hypothesis that vision dominates touch is strengthened by our failure to refute it.
PubMed: 951165
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:951165Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dominance of touch by vision: generalization of the hypothesis to a tactually experienced population.</title><author><name sortKey="Power, R P" sort="Power, R P" uniqKey="Power R" first="R P" last="Power">R P Power</name></author><author><name sortKey="Graham, A" sort="Graham, A" uniqKey="Graham A" first="A" last="Graham">A. Graham</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1976">1976</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:951165</idno><idno type="pmid">951165</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002420</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002420</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002138</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Dominance of touch by vision: generalization of the hypothesis to a tactually experienced population.</title><author><name sortKey="Power, R P" sort="Power, R P" uniqKey="Power R" first="R P" last="Power">R P Power</name></author><author><name sortKey="Graham, A" sort="Graham, A" uniqKey="Graham A" first="A" last="Graham">A. Graham</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Perception</title><idno type="ISSN">0301-0066</idno><imprint><date when="1976" type="published">1976</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Humans</term><term>Statistics as Topic</term><term>Touch</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Humans</term><term>Statistics as Topic</term><term>Touch</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">It is now held that in conditions where there is conflicting sensory information vision dominates touch. The present study was designed to place boundary conditions on the generality of the hypothesis by comparing the performance of tactually experienced subjects - potters - with university students on a form-perception task in which a square was optically distorted so as to appear rectangular. Subjects examined the square haptically and visually, and matched it by touch or vision. Although potters were more accurate than students when not permitted vision, tactual judgements of both were dominated by vision when they were presented with conflicting information. In a supplementary study longer, more active exploration and emphasis on the necessity of matching by touch had no differential effect. In a third study it was found that a range effect produced by the comparison stimuli could explain the lesser accuracy of the students when they were making haptic judgements. The generality of the hypothesis that vision dominates touch is strengthened by our failure to refute it.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">951165</PMID><DateCreated><Year>1976</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>1976</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2007</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0301-0066</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>5</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>1976</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Perception</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Perception</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Dominance of touch by vision: generalization of the hypothesis to a tactually experienced population.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>161-6</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>It is now held that in conditions where there is conflicting sensory information vision dominates touch. The present study was designed to place boundary conditions on the generality of the hypothesis by comparing the performance of tactually experienced subjects - potters - with university students on a form-perception task in which a square was optically distorted so as to appear rectangular. Subjects examined the square haptically and visually, and matched it by touch or vision. Although potters were more accurate than students when not permitted vision, tactual judgements of both were dominated by vision when they were presented with conflicting information. In a supplementary study longer, more active exploration and emphasis on the necessity of matching by touch had no differential effect. In a third study it was found that a range effect produced by the comparison stimuli could explain the lesser accuracy of the students when they were making haptic judgements. The generality of the hypothesis that vision dominates touch is strengthened by our failure to refute it.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Power</LastName><ForeName>R P</ForeName><Initials>RP</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Graham</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>ENGLAND</Country><MedlineTA>Perception</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0372307</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0301-0066</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000293">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013223">Statistics as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1976</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1976</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1976</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">951165</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Graham, A" sort="Graham, A" uniqKey="Graham A" first="A" last="Graham">A. Graham</name><name sortKey="Power, R P" sort="Power, R P" uniqKey="Power R" first="R P" last="Power">R P Power</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002138 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002138 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:951165
|texte= Dominance of touch by vision: generalization of the hypothesis to a tactually experienced population.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:951165" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |