Perceptual conflict between vision and touch.
Identifieur interne : 002137 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002136; suivant : 002138Perceptual conflict between vision and touch.
Auteurs : T. OgawaSource :
- Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology [ 0021-5236 ] ; 1976.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiology : Discrimination (Psychology), Form Perception, Perceptual Distortion, Touch.
- Female, Humans, Male.
Abstract
Although most of the studies support the conclusion that a perceptual conflict may be resolved in the visual dominance, a few suggest its prematurity and methodological problems. In the present study, the conflict was made by the instruction and the trick in order to keep the S's naivety, and the degree of conflict was varied. wthe visual comparison (vision), the haptic comparison (touch), the visual-haptic comparison (drawing by a pencil), and the haptic-visual comparison (production by the plasticine) were used as the comparison procedures. The result was that the perceptual conflict was resolved in a compromise between vision and touch. However, as the degree of conflict became greater, the judgements in the conflict tended to depend upon the comparison procedures. And in such a conflict taht the visual size was smaller than the tactual, the vision dominance tended to occur, and vice versa.
PubMed: 988361
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:988361Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Perceptual conflict between vision and touch.</title><author><name sortKey="Ogawa, T" sort="Ogawa, T" uniqKey="Ogawa T" first="T" last="Ogawa">T. Ogawa</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1976">1976</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:988361</idno><idno type="pmid">988361</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002415</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002415</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002137</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Perceptual conflict between vision and touch.</title><author><name sortKey="Ogawa, T" sort="Ogawa, T" uniqKey="Ogawa T" first="T" last="Ogawa">T. Ogawa</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology</title><idno type="ISSN">0021-5236</idno><imprint><date when="1976" type="published">1976</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Discrimination (Psychology) (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Form Perception (physiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Perceptual Distortion (physiology)</term><term>Touch (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Form Perception</term><term>Perceptual Distortion</term><term>Touch</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Although most of the studies support the conclusion that a perceptual conflict may be resolved in the visual dominance, a few suggest its prematurity and methodological problems. In the present study, the conflict was made by the instruction and the trick in order to keep the S's naivety, and the degree of conflict was varied. wthe visual comparison (vision), the haptic comparison (touch), the visual-haptic comparison (drawing by a pencil), and the haptic-visual comparison (production by the plasticine) were used as the comparison procedures. The result was that the perceptual conflict was resolved in a compromise between vision and touch. However, as the degree of conflict became greater, the judgements in the conflict tended to depend upon the comparison procedures. And in such a conflict taht the visual size was smaller than the tactual, the vision dominance tended to occur, and vice versa.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">988361</PMID><DateCreated><Year>1976</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>1976</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0021-5236</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>47</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>1976</Year><Month>Jun</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Shinrigaku Kenkyu</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Perceptual conflict between vision and touch.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>97-101</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Although most of the studies support the conclusion that a perceptual conflict may be resolved in the visual dominance, a few suggest its prematurity and methodological problems. In the present study, the conflict was made by the instruction and the trick in order to keep the S's naivety, and the degree of conflict was varied. wthe visual comparison (vision), the haptic comparison (touch), the visual-haptic comparison (drawing by a pencil), and the haptic-visual comparison (production by the plasticine) were used as the comparison procedures. The result was that the perceptual conflict was resolved in a compromise between vision and touch. However, as the degree of conflict became greater, the judgements in the conflict tended to depend upon the comparison procedures. And in such a conflict taht the visual size was smaller than the tactual, the vision dominance tended to occur, and vice versa.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ogawa</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>jpn</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>JAPAN</Country><MedlineTA>Shinrigaku Kenkyu</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0413571</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0021-5236</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004192">Discrimination (Psychology)</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005556">Form Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010469">Perceptual Distortion</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1976</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1976</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1976</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">988361</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Ogawa, T" sort="Ogawa, T" uniqKey="Ogawa T" first="T" last="Ogawa">T. Ogawa</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002137 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002137 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:988361
|texte= Perceptual conflict between vision and touch.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:988361" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |