Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent

Identifieur interne : 000907 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000906; suivant : 000908

Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent

Auteurs : Sangtae Park [États-Unis] ; Omar Jaffer ; Yair Lotan ; Hossein Saboorian ; Claus G. Roehrborn ; Jeffrey A. Cadeddu

Source :

RBID : Pascal:07-0108740

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Although contemporary cohort comparisons are lacking, open surgeons have questioned the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) owing to the lack of haptic feedback. As such, we compared the pathologic outcomes and predicted the progression-free survival after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and LRP in a single referral setting within a defined period, thereby isolating the effect of the surgical technique alone. METHODS Data were collected on 169 ORPs and 111 LRPs performed at our institution from May 2003 to May 2005. The surgical pathologic outcomes were compared, and the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to calculate the 5 and 7-year progression-free probabilities after ORP and LRP. RESULTS On univariate analysis, no differences were found in age, Gleason sum, stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion. The positive margin rate was 29% for LRP and 35% for ORP (P = 0.29), and no difference was found even after stratifying by pathologic stage. After controlling for Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, nodal involvement, margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen, no difference was found in detectable prostate-specific antigen after ORP and LRP (P = 0.73). When the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to compute the biochemical progression-free probabilities, no differences were found at 5 (P = 0.51) and 7 years (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary series without the confounding effects of stage migration, regional practice variation, or the use of historical controls, the pathologic outcome after conventional LRP was similar to that after ORP. Biochemical progression-free survival was also similar using a validated multivariate predictive model.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0090-4295
A02 01      @0 URGYAZ
A03   1    @0 Urology : (Ridgewood NJ)
A05       @2 69
A06       @2 1
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent
A11 01  1    @1 PARK (Sangtae)
A11 02  1    @1 JAFFER (Omar)
A11 03  1    @1 LOTAN (Yair)
A11 04  1    @1 SABOORIAN (Hossein)
A11 05  1    @1 ROEHRBORN (Claus G.)
A11 06  1    @1 CADEDDU (Jeffrey A.)
A14 01      @1 Departments of Urology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center @2 Dallas, Texas @3 USA
A20       @1 118-122
A21       @1 2007
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 15471 @5 354000145491750230
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 25 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 07-0108740
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ)
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 OBJECTIVES Although contemporary cohort comparisons are lacking, open surgeons have questioned the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) owing to the lack of haptic feedback. As such, we compared the pathologic outcomes and predicted the progression-free survival after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and LRP in a single referral setting within a defined period, thereby isolating the effect of the surgical technique alone. METHODS Data were collected on 169 ORPs and 111 LRPs performed at our institution from May 2003 to May 2005. The surgical pathologic outcomes were compared, and the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to calculate the 5 and 7-year progression-free probabilities after ORP and LRP. RESULTS On univariate analysis, no differences were found in age, Gleason sum, stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion. The positive margin rate was 29% for LRP and 35% for ORP (P = 0.29), and no difference was found even after stratifying by pathologic stage. After controlling for Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, nodal involvement, margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen, no difference was found in detectable prostate-specific antigen after ORP and LRP (P = 0.73). When the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to compute the biochemical progression-free probabilities, no differences were found at 5 (P = 0.51) and 7 years (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary series without the confounding effects of stage migration, regional practice variation, or the use of historical controls, the pathologic outcome after conventional LRP was similar to that after ORP. Biochemical progression-free survival was also similar using a validated multivariate predictive model.
C02 01  X    @0 002B14
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie endoscopique @5 02
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Endoscopic surgery @5 02
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía endoscópica @5 02
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Prostatectomie @5 03
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Prostatectomy @5 03
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Prostatectomía @5 03
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Coeliochirurgie @5 05
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Laparoscopic surgery @5 05
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía laparoscopica @5 05
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Pronostic @5 06
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Prognosis @5 06
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Pronóstico @5 06
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Postopératoire @5 08
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Postoperative @5 08
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Postoperatorio @5 08
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Abaque @5 09
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Nomograms @5 09
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Abaco @5 09
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Nomogramme @5 11
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Nomogram @5 11
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Nomograma @5 11
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Urologie @5 12
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Urology @5 12
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Urología @5 12
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Traitement @5 25
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Treatment @5 25
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Tratamiento @5 25
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Voie rétropubienne @4 CD @5 96
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Retropubic route @4 CD @5 96
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Vía retropubiana @4 CD @5 96
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Néphrologie @4 CD @5 97
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Nephrology @4 CD @5 97
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Nefrología @4 CD @5 97
N21       @1 071
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:07-0108740

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Park, Sangtae" sort="Park, Sangtae" uniqKey="Park S" first="Sangtae" last="Park">Sangtae Park</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Departments of Urology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Dallas, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jaffer, Omar" sort="Jaffer, Omar" uniqKey="Jaffer O" first="Omar" last="Jaffer">Omar Jaffer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lotan, Yair" sort="Lotan, Yair" uniqKey="Lotan Y" first="Yair" last="Lotan">Yair Lotan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Saboorian, Hossein" sort="Saboorian, Hossein" uniqKey="Saboorian H" first="Hossein" last="Saboorian">Hossein Saboorian</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Roehrborn, Claus G" sort="Roehrborn, Claus G" uniqKey="Roehrborn C" first="Claus G." last="Roehrborn">Claus G. Roehrborn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" sort="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Cadeddu J" first="Jeffrey A." last="Cadeddu">Jeffrey A. Cadeddu</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0108740</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0108740 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0108740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000B88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000907</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Park, Sangtae" sort="Park, Sangtae" uniqKey="Park S" first="Sangtae" last="Park">Sangtae Park</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Departments of Urology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Dallas, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jaffer, Omar" sort="Jaffer, Omar" uniqKey="Jaffer O" first="Omar" last="Jaffer">Omar Jaffer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lotan, Yair" sort="Lotan, Yair" uniqKey="Lotan Y" first="Yair" last="Lotan">Yair Lotan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Saboorian, Hossein" sort="Saboorian, Hossein" uniqKey="Saboorian H" first="Hossein" last="Saboorian">Hossein Saboorian</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Roehrborn, Claus G" sort="Roehrborn, Claus G" uniqKey="Roehrborn C" first="Claus G." last="Roehrborn">Claus G. Roehrborn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" sort="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Cadeddu J" first="Jeffrey A." last="Cadeddu">Jeffrey A. Cadeddu</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Urology : (Ridgewood NJ)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-4295</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Urology : (Ridgewood NJ)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-4295</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Endoscopic surgery</term>
<term>Laparoscopic surgery</term>
<term>Nephrology</term>
<term>Nomogram</term>
<term>Nomograms</term>
<term>Postoperative</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Prostatectomy</term>
<term>Retropubic route</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Urology</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Chirurgie endoscopique</term>
<term>Prostatectomie</term>
<term>Coeliochirurgie</term>
<term>Pronostic</term>
<term>Postopératoire</term>
<term>Abaque</term>
<term>Nomogramme</term>
<term>Urologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Voie rétropubienne</term>
<term>Néphrologie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">OBJECTIVES Although contemporary cohort comparisons are lacking, open surgeons have questioned the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) owing to the lack of haptic feedback. As such, we compared the pathologic outcomes and predicted the progression-free survival after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and LRP in a single referral setting within a defined period, thereby isolating the effect of the surgical technique alone. METHODS Data were collected on 169 ORPs and 111 LRPs performed at our institution from May 2003 to May 2005. The surgical pathologic outcomes were compared, and the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to calculate the 5 and 7-year progression-free probabilities after ORP and LRP. RESULTS On univariate analysis, no differences were found in age, Gleason sum, stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion. The positive margin rate was 29% for LRP and 35% for ORP (P = 0.29), and no difference was found even after stratifying by pathologic stage. After controlling for Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, nodal involvement, margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen, no difference was found in detectable prostate-specific antigen after ORP and LRP (P = 0.73). When the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to compute the biochemical progression-free probabilities, no differences were found at 5 (P = 0.51) and 7 years (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary series without the confounding effects of stage migration, regional practice variation, or the use of historical controls, the pathologic outcome after conventional LRP was similar to that after ORP. Biochemical progression-free survival was also similar using a validated multivariate predictive model.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0090-4295</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>URGYAZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Urology : (Ridgewood NJ)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>69</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>PARK (Sangtae)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>JAFFER (Omar)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>LOTAN (Yair)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>SABOORIAN (Hossein)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>ROEHRBORN (Claus G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1">
<s1>CADEDDU (Jeffrey A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Departments of Urology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Dallas, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>118-122</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15471</s2>
<s5>354000145491750230</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>25 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>07-0108740</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>OBJECTIVES Although contemporary cohort comparisons are lacking, open surgeons have questioned the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) owing to the lack of haptic feedback. As such, we compared the pathologic outcomes and predicted the progression-free survival after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and LRP in a single referral setting within a defined period, thereby isolating the effect of the surgical technique alone. METHODS Data were collected on 169 ORPs and 111 LRPs performed at our institution from May 2003 to May 2005. The surgical pathologic outcomes were compared, and the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to calculate the 5 and 7-year progression-free probabilities after ORP and LRP. RESULTS On univariate analysis, no differences were found in age, Gleason sum, stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion. The positive margin rate was 29% for LRP and 35% for ORP (P = 0.29), and no difference was found even after stratifying by pathologic stage. After controlling for Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, nodal involvement, margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen, no difference was found in detectable prostate-specific antigen after ORP and LRP (P = 0.73). When the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to compute the biochemical progression-free probabilities, no differences were found at 5 (P = 0.51) and 7 years (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary series without the confounding effects of stage migration, regional practice variation, or the use of historical controls, the pathologic outcome after conventional LRP was similar to that after ORP. Biochemical progression-free survival was also similar using a validated multivariate predictive model.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B14</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie endoscopique</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Endoscopic surgery</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía endoscópica</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Prostatectomie</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Prostatectomy</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Prostatectomía</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Coeliochirurgie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Laparoscopic surgery</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía laparoscopica</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pronostic</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Prognosis</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Pronóstico</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Postopératoire</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Postoperative</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Postoperatorio</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Abaque</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Nomograms</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Abaco</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Nomogramme</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Nomogram</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Nomograma</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Urologie</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Urology</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Urología</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Voie rétropubienne</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Retropubic route</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Vía retropubiana</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Néphrologie</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Nephrology</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Nefrología</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>071</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000907 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000907 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:07-0108740
   |texte=   Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024