Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent
Identifieur interne : 000907 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000906; suivant : 000908Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent
Auteurs : Sangtae Park [États-Unis] ; Omar Jaffer ; Yair Lotan ; Hossein Saboorian ; Claus G. Roehrborn ; Jeffrey A. CadedduSource :
- Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ) [ 0090-4295 ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although contemporary cohort comparisons are lacking, open surgeons have questioned the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) owing to the lack of haptic feedback. As such, we compared the pathologic outcomes and predicted the progression-free survival after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and LRP in a single referral setting within a defined period, thereby isolating the effect of the surgical technique alone. METHODS Data were collected on 169 ORPs and 111 LRPs performed at our institution from May 2003 to May 2005. The surgical pathologic outcomes were compared, and the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to calculate the 5 and 7-year progression-free probabilities after ORP and LRP. RESULTS On univariate analysis, no differences were found in age, Gleason sum, stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion. The positive margin rate was 29% for LRP and 35% for ORP (P = 0.29), and no difference was found even after stratifying by pathologic stage. After controlling for Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, nodal involvement, margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen, no difference was found in detectable prostate-specific antigen after ORP and LRP (P = 0.73). When the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to compute the biochemical progression-free probabilities, no differences were found at 5 (P = 0.51) and 7 years (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary series without the confounding effects of stage migration, regional practice variation, or the use of historical controls, the pathologic outcome after conventional LRP was similar to that after ORP. Biochemical progression-free survival was also similar using a validated multivariate predictive model.
pA |
|
---|
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000B88
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:07-0108740Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent</title>
<author><name sortKey="Park, Sangtae" sort="Park, Sangtae" uniqKey="Park S" first="Sangtae" last="Park">Sangtae Park</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Departments of Urology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Dallas, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jaffer, Omar" sort="Jaffer, Omar" uniqKey="Jaffer O" first="Omar" last="Jaffer">Omar Jaffer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lotan, Yair" sort="Lotan, Yair" uniqKey="Lotan Y" first="Yair" last="Lotan">Yair Lotan</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Saboorian, Hossein" sort="Saboorian, Hossein" uniqKey="Saboorian H" first="Hossein" last="Saboorian">Hossein Saboorian</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Roehrborn, Claus G" sort="Roehrborn, Claus G" uniqKey="Roehrborn C" first="Claus G." last="Roehrborn">Claus G. Roehrborn</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" sort="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Cadeddu J" first="Jeffrey A." last="Cadeddu">Jeffrey A. Cadeddu</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0108740</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0108740 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0108740</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000B88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000907</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent</title>
<author><name sortKey="Park, Sangtae" sort="Park, Sangtae" uniqKey="Park S" first="Sangtae" last="Park">Sangtae Park</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Departments of Urology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Dallas, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jaffer, Omar" sort="Jaffer, Omar" uniqKey="Jaffer O" first="Omar" last="Jaffer">Omar Jaffer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lotan, Yair" sort="Lotan, Yair" uniqKey="Lotan Y" first="Yair" last="Lotan">Yair Lotan</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Saboorian, Hossein" sort="Saboorian, Hossein" uniqKey="Saboorian H" first="Hossein" last="Saboorian">Hossein Saboorian</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Roehrborn, Claus G" sort="Roehrborn, Claus G" uniqKey="Roehrborn C" first="Claus G." last="Roehrborn">Claus G. Roehrborn</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" sort="Cadeddu, Jeffrey A" uniqKey="Cadeddu J" first="Jeffrey A." last="Cadeddu">Jeffrey A. Cadeddu</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Urology : (Ridgewood NJ)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-4295</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Urology : (Ridgewood NJ)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-4295</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Endoscopic surgery</term>
<term>Laparoscopic surgery</term>
<term>Nephrology</term>
<term>Nomogram</term>
<term>Nomograms</term>
<term>Postoperative</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Prostatectomy</term>
<term>Retropubic route</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Urology</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chirurgie endoscopique</term>
<term>Prostatectomie</term>
<term>Coeliochirurgie</term>
<term>Pronostic</term>
<term>Postopératoire</term>
<term>Abaque</term>
<term>Nomogramme</term>
<term>Urologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Voie rétropubienne</term>
<term>Néphrologie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">OBJECTIVES Although contemporary cohort comparisons are lacking, open surgeons have questioned the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) owing to the lack of haptic feedback. As such, we compared the pathologic outcomes and predicted the progression-free survival after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and LRP in a single referral setting within a defined period, thereby isolating the effect of the surgical technique alone. METHODS Data were collected on 169 ORPs and 111 LRPs performed at our institution from May 2003 to May 2005. The surgical pathologic outcomes were compared, and the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to calculate the 5 and 7-year progression-free probabilities after ORP and LRP. RESULTS On univariate analysis, no differences were found in age, Gleason sum, stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion. The positive margin rate was 29% for LRP and 35% for ORP (P = 0.29), and no difference was found even after stratifying by pathologic stage. After controlling for Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, nodal involvement, margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen, no difference was found in detectable prostate-specific antigen after ORP and LRP (P = 0.73). When the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to compute the biochemical progression-free probabilities, no differences were found at 5 (P = 0.51) and 7 years (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary series without the confounding effects of stage migration, regional practice variation, or the use of historical controls, the pathologic outcome after conventional LRP was similar to that after ORP. Biochemical progression-free survival was also similar using a validated multivariate predictive model.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0090-4295</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>URGYAZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Urology : (Ridgewood NJ)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>69</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>PARK (Sangtae)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>JAFFER (Omar)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>LOTAN (Yair)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SABOORIAN (Hossein)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>ROEHRBORN (Claus G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>CADEDDU (Jeffrey A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Departments of Urology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</s1>
<s2>Dallas, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>118-122</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15471</s2>
<s5>354000145491750230</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>25 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0108740</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Urology : (Ridgewood, NJ)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>OBJECTIVES Although contemporary cohort comparisons are lacking, open surgeons have questioned the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) owing to the lack of haptic feedback. As such, we compared the pathologic outcomes and predicted the progression-free survival after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and LRP in a single referral setting within a defined period, thereby isolating the effect of the surgical technique alone. METHODS Data were collected on 169 ORPs and 111 LRPs performed at our institution from May 2003 to May 2005. The surgical pathologic outcomes were compared, and the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to calculate the 5 and 7-year progression-free probabilities after ORP and LRP. RESULTS On univariate analysis, no differences were found in age, Gleason sum, stage, margin status, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion. The positive margin rate was 29% for LRP and 35% for ORP (P = 0.29), and no difference was found even after stratifying by pathologic stage. After controlling for Gleason sum, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, nodal involvement, margin status, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen, no difference was found in detectable prostate-specific antigen after ORP and LRP (P = 0.73). When the Kattan postoperative nomogram was used to compute the biochemical progression-free probabilities, no differences were found at 5 (P = 0.51) and 7 years (P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS In this contemporary series without the confounding effects of stage migration, regional practice variation, or the use of historical controls, the pathologic outcome after conventional LRP was similar to that after ORP. Biochemical progression-free survival was also similar using a validated multivariate predictive model.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B14</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie endoscopique</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Endoscopic surgery</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía endoscópica</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prostatectomie</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prostatectomy</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prostatectomía</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Coeliochirurgie</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Laparoscopic surgery</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía laparoscopica</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pronostic</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prognosis</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pronóstico</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postopératoire</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Postoperative</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Postoperatorio</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Abaque</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nomograms</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Abaco</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Nomogramme</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nomogram</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Nomograma</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Urologie</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Urology</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Urología</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Voie rétropubienne</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Retropubic route</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vía retropubiana</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Néphrologie</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nephrology</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Nefrología</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>97</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>071</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000907 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000907 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:07-0108740 |texte= Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy : Pathologic outcomes and kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |