Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder
Identifieur interne : 009413 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 009412; suivant : 009414Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder
Auteurs : Randall Olson ; Robert Cameron ; Todd Hovis ; John Hunkeler ; Richard Lindstrom ; Roger SteinertSource :
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 1997.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting: Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.Methods: One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.Results: The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002257
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002257
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003C62
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title><author><name sortKey="Olson, Randall" sort="Olson, Randall" uniqKey="Olson R" first="Randall" last="Olson">Randall Olson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cameron, Robert" sort="Cameron, Robert" uniqKey="Cameron R" first="Robert" last="Cameron">Robert Cameron</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hovis, Todd" sort="Hovis, Todd" uniqKey="Hovis T" first="Todd" last="Hovis">Todd Hovis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hunkeler, John" sort="Hunkeler, John" uniqKey="Hunkeler J" first="John" last="Hunkeler">John Hunkeler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindstrom, Richard" sort="Lindstrom, Richard" uniqKey="Lindstrom R" first="Richard" last="Lindstrom">Richard Lindstrom</name></author><author><name sortKey="Steinert, Roger" sort="Steinert, Roger" uniqKey="Steinert R" first="Roger" last="Steinert">Roger Steinert</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802</idno><date when="1997" year="1997">1997</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002257</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002257</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003C62</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0886-3350:1997:Olson R:clinical:evaluation:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009413</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title><author><name sortKey="Olson, Randall" sort="Olson, Randall" uniqKey="Olson R" first="Randall" last="Olson">Randall Olson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cameron, Robert" sort="Cameron, Robert" uniqKey="Cameron R" first="Robert" last="Cameron">Robert Cameron</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hovis, Todd" sort="Hovis, Todd" uniqKey="Hovis T" first="Todd" last="Hovis">Todd Hovis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hunkeler, John" sort="Hunkeler, John" uniqKey="Hunkeler J" first="John" last="Hunkeler">John Hunkeler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindstrom, Richard" sort="Lindstrom, Richard" uniqKey="Lindstrom R" first="Richard" last="Lindstrom">Richard Lindstrom</name></author><author><name sortKey="Steinert, Roger" sort="Steinert, Roger" uniqKey="Steinert R" first="Roger" last="Steinert">Roger Steinert</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1997">1997</date><biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1384">1384</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1389">1389</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></series><idno type="istex">751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="ArticleID">80119</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting: Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.Methods: One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.Results: The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 009413 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 009413 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802
|texte= Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |