Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder
Identifieur interne : 002257 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002256; suivant : 002258Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder
Auteurs : Randall Olson ; Robert Cameron ; Todd Hovis ; John Hunkeler ; Richard Lindstrom ; Roger SteinertSource :
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 1997.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting: Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.Methods: One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.Results: The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title><author><name sortKey="Olson, Randall" sort="Olson, Randall" uniqKey="Olson R" first="Randall" last="Olson">Randall Olson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cameron, Robert" sort="Cameron, Robert" uniqKey="Cameron R" first="Robert" last="Cameron">Robert Cameron</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hovis, Todd" sort="Hovis, Todd" uniqKey="Hovis T" first="Todd" last="Hovis">Todd Hovis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hunkeler, John" sort="Hunkeler, John" uniqKey="Hunkeler J" first="John" last="Hunkeler">John Hunkeler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindstrom, Richard" sort="Lindstrom, Richard" uniqKey="Lindstrom R" first="Richard" last="Lindstrom">Richard Lindstrom</name></author><author><name sortKey="Steinert, Roger" sort="Steinert, Roger" uniqKey="Steinert R" first="Roger" last="Steinert">Roger Steinert</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802</idno><date when="1997" year="1997">1997</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002257</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title><author><name sortKey="Olson, Randall" sort="Olson, Randall" uniqKey="Olson R" first="Randall" last="Olson">Randall Olson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cameron, Robert" sort="Cameron, Robert" uniqKey="Cameron R" first="Robert" last="Cameron">Robert Cameron</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hovis, Todd" sort="Hovis, Todd" uniqKey="Hovis T" first="Todd" last="Hovis">Todd Hovis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hunkeler, John" sort="Hunkeler, John" uniqKey="Hunkeler J" first="John" last="Hunkeler">John Hunkeler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindstrom, Richard" sort="Lindstrom, Richard" uniqKey="Lindstrom R" first="Richard" last="Lindstrom">Richard Lindstrom</name></author><author><name sortKey="Steinert, Roger" sort="Steinert, Roger" uniqKey="Steinert R" first="Roger" last="Steinert">Roger Steinert</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1997">1997</date><biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1384">1384</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1389">1389</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></series><idno type="istex">751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="ArticleID">80119</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting: Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.Methods: One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.Results: The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Randall Olson MD</name></json:item><json:item><name>Robert Cameron MD</name></json:item><json:item><name>Todd Hovis MD</name></json:item><json:item><name>John Hunkeler MD</name></json:item><json:item><name>Richard Lindstrom MD</name></json:item><json:item><name>Roger Steinert MD</name></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>80119</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting: Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.Methods: One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.Results: The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.481</score><pdfVersion>1.7</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>576 x 828 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1322</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>2237</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>14557</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>187</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title><pii><json:string>S0886-3350(97)80119-8</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>23</volume><pii><json:string>S0886-3350(97)X8093-9</json:string></pii><pages><last>1389</last><first>1384</first></pages><issn><json:string>0886-3350</json:string></issn><issue>9</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate></host><publicationDate>1997</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1997</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</json:string></doi><id>751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1997</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Presented in part at the 1997 Royal Hawaiian Eye, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 1997, and the Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 1997.</note><note>Supported in part by Allergan and by a grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York, USA, to the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Utah.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Randall</forename><surname>Olson</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Robert</forename><surname>Cameron</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Todd</forename><surname>Hovis</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">John</forename><surname>Hunkeler</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Richard</forename><surname>Lindstrom</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Roger</forename><surname>Steinert</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="pISSN">0886-3350</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(97)X8093-9</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1997"></date><biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1384">1384</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1389">1389</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(97)80119-8</idno><idno type="ArticleID">80119</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1997</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Purpose: To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting: Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.Methods: One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.Results: The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1997">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier doc found" wicri:toSee="Elsevier, no converted or simple article"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" </istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 5.2.0//EN//XML" URI="art520.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article version="5.2" xml:lang="en" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>JCRS</jid><aid>80119</aid><ce:pii>S0886-3350(97)80119-8</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="society" year="1997">American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</ce:copyright><ce:copyright-line>Copyright 1997 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</ce:copyright-line></item-info><head><ce:article-footnote><ce:note-para id="ntp005">Presented in part at the 1997 Royal Hawaiian Eye, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 1997, and the Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 1997.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:article-footnote><ce:note-para id="ntp010">Supported in part by Allergan and by a grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York, USA, to the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Utah.</ce:note-para></ce:article-footnote><ce:title id="ttl005">Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</ce:title><ce:author-group id="AUG005"><ce:author id="AUT005"><ce:given-name>Randall</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Olson</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref id="crr005" refid="cor1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author id="AUT010"><ce:given-name>Robert</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Cameron</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees></ce:author><ce:author id="AUT015"><ce:given-name>Todd</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Hovis</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees></ce:author><ce:author id="AUT020"><ce:given-name>John</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Hunkeler</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees></ce:author><ce:author id="AUT025"><ce:given-name>Richard</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Lindstrom</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees></ce:author><ce:author id="AUT030"><ce:given-name>Roger</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Steinert</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees></ce:author><ce:correspondence id="cor1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:text>Reprint requests to Randall Olson, MD, SO North Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:abstract id="ab1"><ce:section-title id="SET005">Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec id="abs005"><ce:simple-para id="SP0005"><ce:bold>Purpose:</ce:bold> To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0010"><ce:bold>Setting:</ce:bold> Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0015"><ce:bold>Methods:</ce:bold> One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0020"><ce:bold>Results:</ce:bold> The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para id="SP0025"><ce:bold>Conclusions:</ce:bold> Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head><tail><ce:bibliography id="R0005"><ce:section-title id="SET010">References</ce:section-title><ce:bibliography-sec id="RS0005"><ce:bib-reference id="bib1"><ce:label>1.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0005"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>DR</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Sanders</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>A</ce:given-name><ce:surname>El Maghraby</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>MC</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Kraff</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>RG</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Berkeley</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Advantages of small-incision surgery</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:edited-book><sb:editors><sb:editor><ce:given-name>JP</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Gills</ce:surname></sb:editor><sb:editor><ce:given-name>DR</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Sanders</ce:surname></sb:editor></sb:editors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Small-Incision Cataract Surgery; Foldable Lenses, One-Stitch Surgery, Sutureless Surgery Astigmatic Keratotomy</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:date>1990</sb:date><sb:publisher><sb:name>Slack</sb:name><sb:location>Thorofare, NJ</sb:location></sb:publisher></sb:edited-book><sb:pages><sb:first-page>3</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>13</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib2"><ce:label>2.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0010"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>RF</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Steinert</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>SF</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Brint</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>SM</ce:given-name><ce:surname>White</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>IH</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Fine</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Astigmatism after small incision cataract surgery; a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison of 4- and 6.5-mm incisions</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Ophthalmology</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>98</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1991</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>417</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>423</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib3"><ce:label>3.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0015"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>T</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Oshika</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Tsuboi</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>S</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Yaguchi</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:et-al></sb:et-al></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Comparative study of intraocular lens implantation through 3.2- and 5.5 mm incisions</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Ophthalmology</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>101</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1994</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>1183</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>1190</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib4"><ce:label>4.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0020"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>RF</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Steinert</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>J</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Deacon</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Enlargement of incision width during phacoemulsification and folded intraocular lens implant surgery</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Ophthalmology</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>103</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1996</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>220</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>225</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference><ce:bib-reference id="bib5"><ce:label>5.</ce:label><sb:reference id="SB0025"><sb:contribution><sb:authors><sb:author><ce:given-name>RJ</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Mackool</ce:surname></sb:author><sb:author><ce:given-name>RS</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Russell</ce:surname></sb:author></sb:authors><sb:title><sb:maintitle>Effect of foldable intraocular lens insertion on incision width</sb:maintitle></sb:title></sb:contribution><sb:host><sb:issue><sb:series><sb:title><sb:maintitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</sb:maintitle></sb:title><sb:volume-nr>22</sb:volume-nr></sb:series><sb:date>1996</sb:date></sb:issue><sb:pages><sb:first-page>571</sb:first-page><sb:last-page>574</sb:last-page></sb:pages></sb:host></sb:reference></ce:bib-reference></ce:bibliography-sec></ce:bibliography></tail></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Randall</namePart><namePart type="family">Olson</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert</namePart><namePart type="family">Cameron</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Todd</namePart><namePart type="family">Hovis</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">John</namePart><namePart type="family">Hunkeler</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard</namePart><namePart type="family">Lindstrom</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Roger</namePart><namePart type="family">Steinert</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1997</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder™ for implantation of AMO® PhacoFlex II® (model SI-30NB or SI-40NB) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Setting: Six investigational sites in five states in the United States: Utah, Texas, Missouri, Minnesota, and Massachusetts.Methods: One hundred one patients from six investigational sites had implantation of an SI-30NB or SI-40NB IOL. Investigators evaluated the clinical acceptability of the Unfolder by comparing their experience with the injector with that using other implantation systems. Internal incision size (dimensions) was measured three times during surgery using a calibrated instrument. Data on safety and efficacy were collected.Results: The investigators rated the Unfolder as clinically acceptable. Mean internal incision size after phacoemulsification but before IOL implantation was 3.0 mm ± 0.1 (SD) (range 2.7 to 3.2 mm). Average internal incision size after IOL implantation was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. There were no reports of haptic deformation, lens optic damage, or postoperative complications related to the Unfolder. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions: Investigators found the Unfolder easy to use. It provided controlled lens implantation through incisions 2.7 to 3.2 mm, with post-IOL implantation incisions ranging from 2.9 to 3.3 mm.</abstract><note>Presented in part at the 1997 Royal Hawaiian Eye, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 1997, and the Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 1997.</note><note>Supported in part by Allergan and by a grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York, USA, to the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Utah.</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JCRS</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">199711</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0886-3350</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0886-3350(97)X8093-9</identifier><part><detail type="volume"><number>23</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>9</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>1275</start><end>1427</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>1384</start><end>1389</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80119-8</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0886-3350(97)80119-8</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">80119</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="">© 1997American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved, ©1997</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><istex:refBibTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802/enrichments/refBib"><teiHeader></teiHeader><text><front></front><body></body><back><listBibl><biblStruct><monogr><title level="m" type="main">Advantages of small-incision surgery. In: Gills]P, Sand-ers DR, eds, Small-Incision Cataract Surgery; Foldable Lenses, One-Stitch Surgery, Sutureless Surgery, Astig-matic Keratotomy</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Sanders</forename><forename type="middle">Dr</forename></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">El</forename><forename type="middle">A</forename><surname>Maghraby</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Kraff</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Mc</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Berkeley</surname></persName></author><imprint><date type="published" when="1990"></date><biblScope unit="page" from="3" to="13"></biblScope><pubPlace>Thorofare, N], Slack</pubPlace></imprint></monogr></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Astigmatism after small incision cataract surgery; a prospective, ran-domized, multicenter comparison of 4-and 6.5-mm incisions</title><author><persName><surname>Steinert Rf</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Brint</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Sf</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>White</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Sm</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Fine</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ophthalmology</title><imprint><biblScope unit="volume">98</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="417" to="423"></biblScope><date type="published" when="1991"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Comparative study of intraocular lens implantation through 3.2-and 5.5 mm incisions</title><author><persName><forename type="middle">T</forename><surname>Oshika</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="middle">S</forename><surname>Tsuboi</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="middle">S</forename><surname>Yaguchi</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ophthalmology</title><imprint><biblScope unit="volume">101</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1183" to="1190"></biblScope><date type="published" when="1994"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Enlargement of incision width during phacoemulsification and folded intraocular lens implant surgery</title><author><persName><surname>Steinert Rf</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Deacon</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Ophthalmology</title><imprint><biblScope unit="volume">103</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="220" to="225"></biblScope><date type="published" when="1996"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Effect of foldable intraocular lens insertion on incision width</title><author><persName><forename type="middle">Rj</forename><surname>Mackool</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Russell</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="m">Investigators Randall Olson</title><meeting><address>Salt Lake City, Utah ; Robert Cameron, MD, Abilene Regional Medical Center, Abilene, Texas ; Columbus, Texas ; Kamas City, Kansas City, Mis-souri</address></meeting><imprint><publisher>Todd Hovis, MD, Columbus Community Hospital John Hunkeler</publisher><date type="published" when="1996"></date><biblScope unit="page" from="571" to="574"></biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct><biblStruct><monogr><author><persName><forename type="first">Richard</forename><surname>Lindstrom</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Phillips</forename><surname>Md</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Eye</surname></persName></author><imprint><publisher>Roger</publisher><pubPlace>Minneapolis, Minnesota ; Steinert, MD ; Boston, Massachusetts</pubPlace></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></listBibl></back></text></istex:refBibTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002257 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002257 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:751C02821F350BE6A7050B7C14932A7B06E1A802
|texte= Clinical evaluation of the Unfolder
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |