Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force.
Identifieur interne : 005E22 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 005E21; suivant : 005E23Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force.
Auteurs : Vikram S. Chib [États-Unis] ; James L. Patton ; Kevin M. Lynch ; Ferdinando A. Mussa-IvaldiSource :
- Journal of neurophysiology [ 0022-3077 ] ; 2006.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Physical Stimulation.
- physiology : Adaptation, Physiological, Feedback, Form Perception, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Touch, Upper Extremity.
- Adult, Elasticity, Female, Humans, Male, Stress, Mechanical.
Abstract
The ability to discriminate an object's shape and mechanical properties from touch is one of the most fundamental somatosensory functions. When exploring physical properties of an object, such as stiffness and curvature, humans probe the object's surface and obtain information from the many sensory receptors in their upper limbs. This sensory information is critical for the guidance of actions. We studied how humans acquire an internal representation of the shape and mechanical properties of surfaces and how this information affects the execution of trajectories over the surface. Experiments involved subjects executing trajectories while holding a planar manipulandum that renders planar virtual objects with variable shape and mechanical properties. Subjects were instructed to make reaching movements with the hand between points on the boundary of a curved virtual disk of varying stiffness and curvature. The results suggest two classifications of adaptive responses: force perturbations and object boundaries. In the first case, a rectilinear hand movement is enforced by opposing the interaction forces. In the second case, the trajectory conforms to the object boundary so as to reduce interaction forces. While this dichotomy is evident for very rigid and very soft objects, the likelihood of an object boundary classification depended, in a smooth and monotonic way, on the average force experienced during the initial movements. Furthermore, the observed response across a variety of stiffness values lead to a constant average interaction force after adaptation. This suggests that the nervous system may select from the two responses through a mechanism that attempts to establish a constant interaction force.
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00610.2005
PubMed: 16207784
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001894
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001894
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001595
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000806
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000806
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000806
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16207784Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force.</title><author><name sortKey="Chib, Vikram S" sort="Chib, Vikram S" uniqKey="Chib V" first="Vikram S" last="Chib">Vikram S. Chib</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL, USA. v-chib@northwestern.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Illinois</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Patton, James L" sort="Patton, James L" uniqKey="Patton J" first="James L" last="Patton">James L. Patton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lynch, Kevin M" sort="Lynch, Kevin M" uniqKey="Lynch K" first="Kevin M" last="Lynch">Kevin M. Lynch</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A" sort="Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A" uniqKey="Mussa Ivaldi F" first="Ferdinando A" last="Mussa-Ivaldi">Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="doi">10.1152/jn.00610.2005</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16207784</idno><idno type="pmid">16207784</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001894</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001894</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001595</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000806</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000806</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000806</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3077:2006:Chib V:haptic:identification:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005E22</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force.</title><author><name sortKey="Chib, Vikram S" sort="Chib, Vikram S" uniqKey="Chib V" first="Vikram S" last="Chib">Vikram S. Chib</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL, USA. v-chib@northwestern.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Illinois</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Patton, James L" sort="Patton, James L" uniqKey="Patton J" first="James L" last="Patton">James L. Patton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lynch, Kevin M" sort="Lynch, Kevin M" uniqKey="Lynch K" first="Kevin M" last="Lynch">Kevin M. Lynch</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A" sort="Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A" uniqKey="Mussa Ivaldi F" first="Ferdinando A" last="Mussa-Ivaldi">Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of neurophysiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3077</idno><imprint><date when="2006" type="published">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adaptation, Physiological (physiology)</term><term>Adult</term><term>Elasticity</term><term>Feedback (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Form Perception (physiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Movement (physiology)</term><term>Physical Stimulation (methods)</term><term>Psychomotor Performance (physiology)</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Touch (physiology)</term><term>Upper Extremity (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Physical Stimulation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Adaptation, Physiological</term><term>Feedback</term><term>Form Perception</term><term>Movement</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Touch</term><term>Upper Extremity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Elasticity</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The ability to discriminate an object's shape and mechanical properties from touch is one of the most fundamental somatosensory functions. When exploring physical properties of an object, such as stiffness and curvature, humans probe the object's surface and obtain information from the many sensory receptors in their upper limbs. This sensory information is critical for the guidance of actions. We studied how humans acquire an internal representation of the shape and mechanical properties of surfaces and how this information affects the execution of trajectories over the surface. Experiments involved subjects executing trajectories while holding a planar manipulandum that renders planar virtual objects with variable shape and mechanical properties. Subjects were instructed to make reaching movements with the hand between points on the boundary of a curved virtual disk of varying stiffness and curvature. The results suggest two classifications of adaptive responses: force perturbations and object boundaries. In the first case, a rectilinear hand movement is enforced by opposing the interaction forces. In the second case, the trajectory conforms to the object boundary so as to reduce interaction forces. While this dichotomy is evident for very rigid and very soft objects, the likelihood of an object boundary classification depended, in a smooth and monotonic way, on the average force experienced during the initial movements. Furthermore, the observed response across a variety of stiffness values lead to a constant average interaction force after adaptation. This suggests that the nervous system may select from the two responses through a mechanism that attempts to establish a constant interaction force.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005E22 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 005E22 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16207784
|texte= Haptic identification of surfaces as fields of force.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16207784" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |