Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process
Identifieur interne : 004D06 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004D05; suivant : 004D07Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process
Auteurs : Rebecca SheehanSource :
- Area [ 0004-0894 ] ; 2011-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title><author><name sortKey="Sheehan, Rebecca" sort="Sheehan, Rebecca" uniqKey="Sheehan R" first="Rebecca" last="Sheehan">Rebecca Sheehan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004D06</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title><author><name sortKey="Sheehan, Rebecca" sort="Sheehan, Rebecca" uniqKey="Sheehan R" first="Rebecca" last="Sheehan">Rebecca Sheehan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Area</title><idno type="ISSN">0004-0894</idno><idno type="eISSN">1475-4762</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="342">342</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0004-0894</idno></series><idno type="istex">9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AREA1000</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0004-0894</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>(inter)personal relations and relationships</term><term>actor‐network theory</term><term>field work</term><term>qualitative research</term><term>reflexivity</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Rebecca Sheehan</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>actor‐network theory</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>(inter)personal relations and relationships</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>reflexivity</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>qualitative research</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>field work</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>AREA1000</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.72</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>498.898 x 748.375 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>406</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5331</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32320</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>60</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title><genre.original><json:string>article</json:string></genre.original><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>43</volume><publisherId><json:string>AREA</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>7</total><last>342</last><first>336</first></pages><issn><json:string>0004-0894</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1475-4762</json:string></eissn><title>Area</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</json:string></doi><id>9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Rebecca</forename><surname>Sheehan</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Area</title><idno type="pISSN">0004-0894</idno><idno type="eISSN">1475-4762</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="342">342</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AREA1000</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>actor‐network theory</term></item><item><term>(inter)personal relations and relationships</term></item><item><term>reflexivity</term></item><item><term>qualitative research</term></item><item><term>field work</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</doi><issn type="print">0004-0894</issn><issn type="electronic">1475-4762</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AREA"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="AREA">Area</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/area.2011.43.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="43">43</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-09">September 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="13" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AREA1000"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 The Author. Area © 2011 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.3 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-04-27"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-04-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-08-02"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-04-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="336">336</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="342">342</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AREA.AREA1000.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Revised manuscript received 21 October 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="43"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5833"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title><title type="shortAuthors">Sheehan</title><title type="short">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Rebecca</givenNames><familyName>Sheehan</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation> Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: <email>rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">actor‐network theory</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">(inter)personal relations and relationships</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">reflexivity</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">qualitative research</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">field work</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><i>In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</i></p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rebecca</namePart><namePart type="family">Sheehan</namePart><affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued><edition>Revised manuscript received 21 October 2010</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">43</extent><extent unit="words">5833</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>actor‐network theory</topic><topic>(inter)personal relations and relationships</topic><topic>reflexivity</topic><topic>qualitative research</topic><topic>field work</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Area</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0004-0894</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1475-4762</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AREA</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>43</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>336</start><end>342</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AREA1000</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 The Author. Area © 2011 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004D06 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004D06 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1
|texte= Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |