Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process
Identifieur interne : 004D06 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 004D05; suivant : 004D07Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process
Auteurs : Rebecca SheehanSource :
- Area [ 0004-0894 ] ; 2011-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sheehan, Rebecca" sort="Sheehan, Rebecca" uniqKey="Sheehan R" first="Rebecca" last="Sheehan">Rebecca Sheehan</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004D06</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sheehan, Rebecca" sort="Sheehan, Rebecca" uniqKey="Sheehan R" first="Rebecca" last="Sheehan">Rebecca Sheehan</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Area</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0004-0894</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1475-4762</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="342">342</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0004-0894</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">AREA1000</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0004-0894</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>(inter)personal relations and relationships</term>
<term>actor‐network theory</term>
<term>field work</term>
<term>qualitative research</term>
<term>reflexivity</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<author><json:item><name>Rebecca Sheehan</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>actor‐network theory</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>(inter)personal relations and relationships</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>reflexivity</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>qualitative research</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>field work</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>AREA1000</json:string>
</articleId>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<abstract>In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>5.72</score>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>498.898 x 748.375 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>5</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>406</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>5331</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>32320</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>60</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
<genre.original><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre.original>
<genre><json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><volume>43</volume>
<publisherId><json:string>AREA</json:string>
</publisherId>
<pages><total>7</total>
<last>342</last>
<first>336</first>
</pages>
<issn><json:string>0004-0894</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>3</issue>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn><json:string>1475-4762</json:string>
</eissn>
<title>Area</title>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</json:string>
</doi>
</host>
<publicationDate>2011</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<extension>zip</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><p>WILEY</p>
</availability>
<date>2011</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
<author><persName><forename type="first">Rebecca</forename>
<surname>Sheehan</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j">Area</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0004-0894</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1475-4762</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-09"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="336">336</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="342">342</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">AREA1000</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date>
</creation>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head>
<item><term>actor‐network theory</term>
</item>
<item><term>(inter)personal relations and relationships</term>
</item>
<item><term>reflexivity</term>
</item>
<item><term>qualitative research</term>
</item>
<item><term>field work</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="2011-09">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<extension>txt</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</doi>
<issn type="print">0004-0894</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1475-4762</issn>
<idGroup><id type="product" value="AREA"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main" sort="AREA">Area</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="09103"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/area.2011.43.issue-3</doi>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="43">43</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2011-09">September 2011</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="13" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</doi>
<idGroup><id type="unit" value="AREA1000"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<copyright>© 2011 The Author. Area © 2011 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</copyright>
<eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.1.3 standalone mode:FullText" date="2012-04-27"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2011-04-12"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-08-02"></event>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2011-04-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-06"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="336">336</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="342">342</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AREA.AREA1000.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Revised manuscript received 21 October 2010</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="43"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="5833"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup><title type="main">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Sheehan</title>
<title type="short">Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Rebecca</givenNames>
<familyName>Sheehan</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation> Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: <email>rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</email>
</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">actor‐network theory</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">(inter)personal relations and relationships</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">reflexivity</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k4">qualitative research</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k5">field work</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><i>In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</i>
</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Rebecca</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sheehan</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA, Email: rebecca.sheehan@okstate.edu</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-09</dateIssued>
<edition>Revised manuscript received 21 October 2010</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
<extent unit="references">43</extent>
<extent unit="words">5833</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">In this article, I argue that actor‐network theory (ANT) provides an avenue to cogent reflexivity. I focus on ‘smaller’ networks and single links, those between the researcher and other actors, both at once enrolled to varying degrees in multiple actor‐networks. Using my own ethnographic research experiences, I show that ANT enables effective and pertinent reflexive translations of the research project.</abstract>
<subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>actor‐network theory</topic>
<topic>(inter)personal relations and relationships</topic>
<topic>reflexivity</topic>
<topic>qualitative research</topic>
<topic>field work</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Area</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0004-0894</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1475-4762</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1475-4762</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">AREA</identifier>
<part><date>2011</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>43</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>336</start>
<end>342</end>
<total>7</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01000.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">AREA1000</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 The Author. Area © 2011 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004D06 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004D06 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= Istex |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:9F5433193EBC40CF77274ECC7BC4697AB152BFD1 |texte= Actor‐network theory as a reflexive tool: (inter)personal relations and relationships in the research process }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |