Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits.
Identifieur interne : 000157 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000156; suivant : 000158Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits.
Auteurs : Mattias Delpont [France] ; Manon Racicot [Canada] ; André Durivage [Canada] ; Lucie Fornili [France] ; Jean-Luc Guerin [France] ; Jean-Pierre Vaillancourt [Canada] ; Mathilde C. Paul [France]Source :
- Transboundary and emerging diseases [ 1865-1682 ] ; 2020.
Abstract
Biosecurity is crucial for infectious disease prevention, more importantly in the absence of vaccination. The need for improving the implementation of biosecurity practices was highlighted in French duck farms following the 2016-2017 H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) epidemic. Farmers have multiple reasons for not implementing biosecurity practices: external (time, money) and internal (socio-psychological). The purpose of this study was to determine how sets of socio-psychological factors (i.e. knowledge on biosecurity and avian influenza transmission, attitudes, personality traits, social background) affect the adoption of on-farm biosecurity practices. Biosecurity practices and socio-psychological determinants were assessed during 127 duck farm visits, in South West France, using both questionnaires and on-farm observations. Factorial analysis of mixed data (FAMD) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) identified three groups of farmers with different socio-psychological profiles: the first group was characterized by minimal knowledge, negative attitudes towards biosecurity, little social pressure and a low level of conscientiousness. The second group was characterized by more extensive experience in poultry production, higher stress and social pressure. The third group was characterized by less experience in poultry production, better knowledge and positive attitudes towards biosecurity, increased self-confidence and orientation towards action. The first group had a significantly lower adoption of biosecurity measures than the two other groups. A better understanding of the factors involved in farmers' decision-making could improve the efficiency of interventions aiming at improving and maintaining the level of on-farm biosecurity in the duck industry.
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13462
PubMed: 31960594
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000157
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:31960594Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits.</title><author><name sortKey="Delpont, Mattias" sort="Delpont, Mattias" uniqKey="Delpont M" first="Mattias" last="Delpont">Mattias Delpont</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Racicot, Manon" sort="Racicot, Manon" uniqKey="Racicot M" first="Manon" last="Racicot">Manon Racicot</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Durivage, Andre" sort="Durivage, Andre" uniqKey="Durivage A" first="André" last="Durivage">André Durivage</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Administrative Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Administrative Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fornili, Lucie" sort="Fornili, Lucie" uniqKey="Fornili L" first="Lucie" last="Fornili">Lucie Fornili</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guerin, Jean Luc" sort="Guerin, Jean Luc" uniqKey="Guerin J" first="Jean-Luc" last="Guerin">Jean-Luc Guerin</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vaillancourt, Jean Pierre" sort="Vaillancourt, Jean Pierre" uniqKey="Vaillancourt J" first="Jean-Pierre" last="Vaillancourt">Jean-Pierre Vaillancourt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Paul, Mathilde C" sort="Paul, Mathilde C" uniqKey="Paul M" first="Mathilde C" last="Paul">Mathilde C. Paul</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2020">2020</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:31960594</idno><idno type="pmid">31960594</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/tbed.13462</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000157</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000157</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000157</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000157</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits.</title><author><name sortKey="Delpont, Mattias" sort="Delpont, Mattias" uniqKey="Delpont M" first="Mattias" last="Delpont">Mattias Delpont</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Racicot, Manon" sort="Racicot, Manon" uniqKey="Racicot M" first="Manon" last="Racicot">Manon Racicot</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Durivage, Andre" sort="Durivage, Andre" uniqKey="Durivage A" first="André" last="Durivage">André Durivage</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Administrative Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Administrative Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Fornili, Lucie" sort="Fornili, Lucie" uniqKey="Fornili L" first="Lucie" last="Fornili">Lucie Fornili</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Guerin, Jean Luc" sort="Guerin, Jean Luc" uniqKey="Guerin J" first="Jean-Luc" last="Guerin">Jean-Luc Guerin</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vaillancourt, Jean Pierre" sort="Vaillancourt, Jean Pierre" uniqKey="Vaillancourt J" first="Jean-Pierre" last="Vaillancourt">Jean-Pierre Vaillancourt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Paul, Mathilde C" sort="Paul, Mathilde C" uniqKey="Paul M" first="Mathilde C" last="Paul">Mathilde C. Paul</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Transboundary and emerging diseases</title><idno type="eISSN">1865-1682</idno><imprint><date when="2020" type="published">2020</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Biosecurity is crucial for infectious disease prevention, more importantly in the absence of vaccination. The need for improving the implementation of biosecurity practices was highlighted in French duck farms following the 2016-2017 H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) epidemic. Farmers have multiple reasons for not implementing biosecurity practices: external (time, money) and internal (socio-psychological). The purpose of this study was to determine how sets of socio-psychological factors (i.e. knowledge on biosecurity and avian influenza transmission, attitudes, personality traits, social background) affect the adoption of on-farm biosecurity practices. Biosecurity practices and socio-psychological determinants were assessed during 127 duck farm visits, in South West France, using both questionnaires and on-farm observations. Factorial analysis of mixed data (FAMD) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) identified three groups of farmers with different socio-psychological profiles: the first group was characterized by minimal knowledge, negative attitudes towards biosecurity, little social pressure and a low level of conscientiousness. The second group was characterized by more extensive experience in poultry production, higher stress and social pressure. The third group was characterized by less experience in poultry production, better knowledge and positive attitudes towards biosecurity, increased self-confidence and orientation towards action. The first group had a significantly lower adoption of biosecurity measures than the two other groups. A better understanding of the factors involved in farmers' decision-making could improve the efficiency of interventions aiming at improving and maintaining the level of on-farm biosecurity in the duck industry.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">31960594</PMID><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1865-1682</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><PubDate><Year>2020</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>20</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Transboundary and emerging diseases</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Transbound Emerg Dis</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits.</ArticleTitle><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/tbed.13462</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Biosecurity is crucial for infectious disease prevention, more importantly in the absence of vaccination. The need for improving the implementation of biosecurity practices was highlighted in French duck farms following the 2016-2017 H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) epidemic. Farmers have multiple reasons for not implementing biosecurity practices: external (time, money) and internal (socio-psychological). The purpose of this study was to determine how sets of socio-psychological factors (i.e. knowledge on biosecurity and avian influenza transmission, attitudes, personality traits, social background) affect the adoption of on-farm biosecurity practices. Biosecurity practices and socio-psychological determinants were assessed during 127 duck farm visits, in South West France, using both questionnaires and on-farm observations. Factorial analysis of mixed data (FAMD) and hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) identified three groups of farmers with different socio-psychological profiles: the first group was characterized by minimal knowledge, negative attitudes towards biosecurity, little social pressure and a low level of conscientiousness. The second group was characterized by more extensive experience in poultry production, higher stress and social pressure. The third group was characterized by less experience in poultry production, better knowledge and positive attitudes towards biosecurity, increased self-confidence and orientation towards action. The first group had a significantly lower adoption of biosecurity measures than the two other groups. A better understanding of the factors involved in farmers' decision-making could improve the efficiency of interventions aiming at improving and maintaining the level of on-farm biosecurity in the duck industry.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Delpont</LastName><ForeName>Mattias</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-8956</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Racicot</LastName><ForeName>Manon</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5003-5901</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Durivage</LastName><ForeName>André</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Administrative Science, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fornili</LastName><ForeName>Lucie</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guerin</LastName><ForeName>Jean-Luc</ForeName><Initials>JL</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-4012</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vaillancourt</LastName><ForeName>Jean-Pierre</ForeName><Initials>JP</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Paul</LastName><ForeName>Mathilde C</ForeName><Initials>MC</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-8547</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2020</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>20</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Transbound Emerg Dis</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101319538</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1865-1674</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">avian influenza</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">compliance</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">perception</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">poultry</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">socio-psychological factors</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2019</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2019</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>21</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2020</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2020</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2020</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31960594</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/tbed.13462</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Title>REFERENCES</Title><Reference><Citation>Alarcon, P., Brouwer, A., Venkatesh, D., Duncan, D., Dovas, C. I., Georgiades, G., … Brown, I. H. (2018). Comparison of 2016-17 and previous epizootics of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 Guangdong lineage in Europe. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 24, 2270-2283. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2412.171860</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Alarcon, P., Wieland, B., Mateus, A. L. P., & Dewberry, C. (2014). Pig farmers’ perceptions, attitudes, influences and management of information in the decision-making process for disease control. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 116, 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.004</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Artois, M., Bicout, D., Doctrinal, D., Fouchier, R., Gavier-Widen, D., Globig, A., … Olsen, B. (2009). Outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Europe: The risks associated with wild birds. Revue Scientifique Et Technique De l'OIE, 28, 69-92. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.28.1.1854</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Axelsson, M. (2013). Report on personality and adherence to antibiotic therapy: A population-based study. BMC Psychology, 1, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-1-24</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Axelsson, M., Brink, E., Lundgren, J., & Lötvall, J. (2011). The influence of personality traits on reported adherence to medication in individuals with chronic disease: An epidemiological study in West Sweden. PLoS ONE, 6, e18241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018241</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Backhans, A., Sjölund, M., Lindberg, A., & Emanuelson, U. (2015). Biosecurity level and health management practices in 60 Swedish farrow-to-finish herds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 57(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-015-0103-5</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Beerens, N., Heutink, R., Bergervoet, S. A., Harders, F., Bossers, A., & Koch, G. (2017). Multiple reassorted viruses as cause of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) virus epidemic, the Netherlands, 2016. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 23, 1974-1981. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2312.171062</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Brennan, M. L., & Christley, R. M. (2012). Biosecurity on cattle farms: A study in North-West England. (Etienne Joly, Ed.) PLoS ONE, 7, e28139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028139</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Brennan, M., Wright, N., Wapenaar, W., Jarratt, S., Hobson-West, P., Richens, I., … O'Connor, H. (2016). Exploring attitudes and beliefs towards implementing cattle disease prevention and control measures: A qualitative study with dairy farmers in Great Britain. Animals, 6, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6100061</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Christensen, A. J., & Smith, T. W. (1995). Personality and patient adherence: Correlates of the five-factor model in renal dialysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857875</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Compmetrica (2012). Test de santé et sécurité au travail - manuel technique.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology Review, 6, 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(86)90029-2</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cui, B., & Liu, Z. P. (2016). Determinants of Knowledge and biosecurity preventive behaviors for highly pathogenic avian influenza risk among Chinese poultry farmers. Avian Diseases, 60, 480-486. https://doi.org/10.1637/11361-010116-Reg</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Delabbio, J., Murphy, B. R., Johnson, G. R., & McMullin, S. L. (2004). An assessment of biosecurity utilization in the recirculation sector of finfish aquaculture in the United States and Canada. Aquaculture, 242, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.03.005</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Delpont, M., Blondel, V., Robertet, L., Duret, H., Guerin, J.-L., Vaillancourt, J.-P., & Paul, M. C. (2018). Biosecurity practices on foie gras duck farms, Southwest France. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 158, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.07.012</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>DGAl (2016). Arrêté du 8 février 2016 relatif aux mesures de biosécurité applicables dans les exploitations de volailles et d'autres oiseaux captifs dans le cadre de la prévention contre l'influenza aviaire. Pub. L. No. NOR: AGRG1603907A.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ellis-Iversen, J., Cook, A. J. C., Watson, E., Nielen, M., Larkin, L., Wooldridge, M., & Hogeveen, H. (2010). Perceptions, circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 93, 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.005</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Garber, L., Bjork, K., Patyk, K., Rawdon, T., Antognoli, M., Delgado, A., … McCluskey, B. (2016). Factors Associated with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N2 Infection on Table-Egg Layer Farms in the Midwestern United States, 2015. Avian Diseases, 60, 460-466. https://doi.org/10.1637/11351-121715-Reg</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Garforth, C. (2015). Livestock keepers’ reasons for doing and not doing things which governments, vets and scientists would like them to do. Zoonoses Public Health, 62, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12189</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gelaude, P., Schlepers, M., Verlinden, M., Laanen, M., & Dewulf, J. (2014). Biocheck.UGent: A quantitative tool to measure biosecurity at broiler farms and the relationship with technical performances and antimicrobial use. Poultry Science, 93, 2740-2751. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04002</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gilbert, M., Chaitaweesub, P., Parakamawongsa, T., Premashthira, S., Tiensin, T., Kalpravidh, W., … Slingenbergh, J. (2006). Free-grazing ducks and highly pathogenic avian influenza, Thailand. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 12, 227-234. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1202.050640</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Guinat, C., Artois, J., Bronner, A., Guérin, J.-L., Gilbert, M., & Paul, M. C. (2019). Duck production systems and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 in France, 2016-2017. Scientific Reports, 9, 6177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42607-x</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Guinat, C., Nicolas, G., Vergne, T., Bronner, A., Durand, B., Courcoul, A., … Paul, M. C. (2018). Spatio-temporal patterns of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N8 spread, France, 2016 to 2017. Eurosurveillance, 23, 1700791. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.26.1700791</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Guinat, C., Rouchy, N., Camy, F., Guerin, J.-L., & Paul, M. C. (2018). Exploring the wind-borne spread of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N8 during the 2016-2017 epizootic in France. Avian Diseases, 63(sp1), 2016-2017. https://doi.org/10.1637/11881-042718-ResNote.1</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gunn, G. J., Heffernan, C., Hall, M., McLeod, A., & Hovi, M. (2008). Measuring and comparing constraints to improved biosecurity amongst GB farmers, veterinarians and the auxiliary industries. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 84, 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.003</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Halvorson, D. A. (2009). Prevention and management of avian influenza outbreaks: Experiences from the United States of America. Revue Scientifique Et Technique De l'OIE, 28, 359-369. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.28.1.1866</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hernández-Jover, M., Taylor, M., Holyoake, P., & Dhand, N. (2012). Pig producers’ perceptions of the Influenza Pandemic H1N1/09 outbreak and its effect on their biosecurity practices in Australia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 106, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.008</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric Statistical Methods (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Husson, F., Le, S., & Pagès, J. (2017). Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Johnson, C. (2018). How-To Series, How to Use Personality Assessment Tests to Improve Workplace Culture and Communication [Online]. Available at https://www.paycom.com/resources/blog/how-to-use-personality-assessment-tests-to-improve-workplace-culture-and-communication (accessed November 25, 2019).</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kristensen, E., & Jakobsen, E. B. (2011). Challenging the myth of the irrational dairy farmer; understanding decision-making related to herd health. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 59, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2011.547162</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Laanen, M., Maes, D., Hendriksen, C., Gelaude, P., De Vliegher, S., Rosseel, Y., & Dewulf, J. (2014). Pig, cattle and poultry farmers with a known interest in research have comparable perspectives on disease prevention and on-farm biosecurity. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 115, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.03.015</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Le, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: A Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764-775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mankad, A. (2016). Psychological influences on biosecurity control and farmer decision-making. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0375-9</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Marier, E., Piers Smith, R., Ellis-Iversen, J., Watson, E., Armstrong, D., Hogeveen, H., & Cook, A. J. C. (2016). Changes in perceptions and motivators that influence the implementation of on-farm Salmonella control measures by pig farmers in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 133, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.009</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Marinova-Petkova, A., Georgiev, G., Petkov, T., Darnell, D., Franks, J., Kayali, G., … Webster, R. G. (2016). Influenza surveillance on “foie gras” duck farms in Bulgaria, 2008-2012. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 10, 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12368</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Millman, C., Christley, R., Rigby, D., Dennis, D., O'Brien, S. J., & Williams, N. (2017). “Catch 22”: Biosecurity awareness, interpretation and practice amongst poultry catchers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 141, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.04.002</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Napp, S., Majó, N., Sánchez-Gónzalez, R., & Vergara-Alert, J. (2018). Emergence and spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) in Europe in 2016-2017. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 65, 1217-1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12861</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nespeca, R., Vaillancourt, J.-P., & Morrow, W. M. (1997). Validation of a poultry biosecurity survey. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 31, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01122-1</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Niemi, J. K., Sahlström, L., Kyyrö, J., Lyytikäinen, T., & Sinisalo, A. (2016). Farm characteristics and perceptions regarding costs contribute to the adoption of biosecurity in Finnish pig and cattle farms. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 97, 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-016-0022-5</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nöremark, M., Frössling, J., & Lewerin, S. S. (2010). Application of routines that contribute to on-farm biosecurity as reported by Swedish livestock farmers. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 57, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01140.x</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nöremark, M., Sternberg Lewerin, S., Ernholm, L., & Frössling, J. (2016). Swedish farmers’ opinions about biosecurity and their intention to make professionals use clean protective clothing when entering the stable. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 3, 46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00046</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>O'Kane, H., Ferguson, E., Kaler, J., & Green, L. (2017). Associations between sheep farmer attitudes, beliefs, emotions and personality, and their barriers to uptake of best practice: The example of footrot. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 139, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.05.009</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pohlmann, A., Starick, E., Grund, C., Höper, D., Strebelow, G., Globig, A., … Beer, M. (2018). Swarm incursions of reassortants of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strains H5N8 and H5N5, clade 2.3.4.4b, Germany, winter 2016/17. Scientific Reports. 8, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16936-8</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>R Core Team (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Racicot, M., Venne, D., Durivage, A., & Vaillancourt, J.-P. (2011). Description of 44 biosecurity errors while entering and exiting poultry barns based on video surveillance in Quebec, Canada. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 100, 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.011</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Racicot, M., Venne, D., Durivage, A., & Vaillancourt, J.-P. (2012a). Evaluation of the relationship between personality traits, experience, education and biosecurity compliance on poultry farms in Québec, Canada. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 103, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.011</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Racicot, M., Venne, D., Durivage, A., & Vaillancourt, J.-P. (2012b). Evaluation of strategies to enhance biosecurity compliance on poultry farms in Québec: Effect of audits and cameras. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 103, 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.004</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ribbens, S., Dewulf, J., Koenen, F., Mintiens, K., De Sadeleer, L., de Kruif, A., & Maes, D. (2008). A survey on biosecurity and management practices in Belgian pig herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 83, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.07.009</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ritter, C., Jansen, J., Roche, S., Kelton, D. F., Adams, C. L., Orsel, K., … Barkema, H. W. (2017). Invited review: Determinants of farmers’ adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control. Journal of Dairy Science, 100, 3329-3347. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11977</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ritter, C., Jansen, J., Roth, K., Kastelic, J. P., Adams, C. L., & Barkema, H. W. (2016). Dairy farmers' perceptions toward the implementation of on-farm Johne's disease prevention and control strategies. Journal of Dairy Science, 99, 9114-9125. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-10896</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Scott, A. B., Phalen, D., Hernandez-Jover, M., Singh, M., Groves, P., & Toribio, J.-A.-L.-M.-L. (2018). Wildlife presence and interactions with chickens on Australian commercial chicken farms assessed by camera traps. Avian Diseases, 62, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1637/11761-101917-Reg.1</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Silva, G. S., Leotti, V. B., Castro, S. M. J., Medeiros, A. A. R., Silva, A. P. S. P., Linhares, D. C. L., & Corbellini, L. G. (2019). Assessment of biosecurity practices and development of a scoring system in swine farms using item response theory. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 167, 128-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.020</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Skinner, T. C., Bruce, D. G., Davis, T. M. E., & Davis, W. A. (2014). Personality traits, self-care behaviours and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle diabetes study phase II. Diabetic Medicine, 31, 487-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12339</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2014). Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 8, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.869710</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Stilley, C. S., Sereika, S., Muldoon, M. F., Ryan, C. M., & Dunbar-Jacob, J. (2004). Psychological and cognitive function: Predictors of adherence with cholesterol lowering treatment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_6</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Świętoń, E., & Śmietanka, K. (2018). Phylogenetic and molecular analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 and H5N5 viruses detected in Poland in 2016-2017. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 65, 1664-1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12924</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Taylor, M. R., Agho, K. E., Stevens, G. J., & Raphael, B. (2008). Factors influencing psychological distress during a disease epidemic: Data from Australia's first outbreak of equine influenza. BMC Public Health, 8, 347. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-347</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Valeeva, N. I., van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M., & Backus, G. B. C. (2011). Perceived risk and strategy efficacy as motivators of risk management strategy adoption to prevent animal diseases in pig farming. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 102, 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.005</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Van Limbergen, T., Dewulf, J., Klinkenberg, M., Ducatelle, R., Gelaude, P., Méndez, J., … on behalf of the PROHEALTH consortium (2018). Scoring biosecurity in European conventional broiler production. Poultry Science, 97, 74-83. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex296</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Van Steenwinkel, S., Ribbens, S., Ducheyne, E., Goossens, E., & Dewulf, J. (2011). Assessing biosecurity practices, movements and densities of poultry sites across Belgium, resulting in different farm risk-groups for infectious disease introduction and spread. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 98, 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.12.004</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vande Velde, F., Charlier, J., & Claerebout, E. (2018). Farmer behavior and gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminant livestock-Uptake of sustainable control approaches. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, 255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00255</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wauters, E., & Rojo Gimeno, C. (2014). Socio-psychological veterinary epidemiology: A new discipline for an old problem? In: Proceedings of the 2014 society for veterinary epidemiology and preventive medicine conference (pp. 133-151). Dublin, Ireland.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wells, S. J., Kromm, M. M., VanBeusekom, E. T., Sorley, E. J., Sundaram, M. E., VanderWaal, K., … Bender, J. (2017). Epidemiologic investigation of highly pathogenic H5N2 avian influenza among upper midwest U.S. Turkey farms, 2015. Avian Diseases, 61, 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1637/11543-112816-Reg.1</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). (2017a). World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS) Interface, Highly pathogenic avian influenza, France [Online]. Available at https://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review/viewsummary?fupser=&dothis=&reportxml:id=21772 (accessed October 31, 2019).</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). (2017b). World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS) Interface, Highly pathogenic avian influenza, Hungary [Online]. Available at https://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review/viewsummary?fupser=&dothis=&reportxml:id=21772 (accessed October 31, 2019).</Citation></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/StressCovidV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= StressCovidV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:31960594
|texte= Determinants of biosecurity practices in French duck farms after a H5N8 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza epidemic: The effect of farmer knowledge, attitudes and personality traits.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:31960594" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a StressCovidV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |