Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.
Identifieur interne : 000382 ( Ncbi/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000381; suivant : 000383Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.
Auteurs : R L Alphin [États-Unis] ; M K Rankin ; K J Johnson ; E R BensonSource :
- Avian diseases [ 0005-2086 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Carbon Dioxide, Flame Retardants, Water.
- methods : Euthanasia, Animal.
- prevention & control : Influenza in Birds.
- Animals, Chickens.
Abstract
Current control strategies for avian influenza (AI) and other highly contagious poultry diseases include surveillance, quarantine, depopulation, disposal, and decontamination. Selection of the best method of emergency mass depopulation involves maximizing human health and safety while minimizing disease spread and animal welfare concerns. Proper selection must ensure that the method is compatible with the species, age, housing type, and disposal options. No one single method is appropriate for all situations. Gassing is one of the accepted methods for euthanatizing poultry. Whole-house, partial-house, or containerized gassing procedures are currently used. The use of water-based foam was developed for emergency mass depopulation and was conditionally approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in 2006. Research has been done comparing these different methods; parameters such as time to brain death, consistency of time to brain death, and pretreatment and posttreatment corticosterone stress levels were considered. In Europe, the use of foam with carbon dioxide is preferred over conventional water-based foam. A recent experiment comparing CO2 gas, foam with CO2 gas, and foam without CO2 gas depopulation methods was conducted with the use of electroencephalometry results. Foam was as consistent as CO2 gassing and more consistent than argon-CO2 gassing. There were no statistically significant differences between foam methods.
DOI: 10.1637/8764-033109-Reg.1
PubMed: 20521728
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000688
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000685
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000696
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000382
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000382
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20521728Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Alphin, R L" sort="Alphin, R L" uniqKey="Alphin R" first="R L" last="Alphin">R L Alphin</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150, USA. ralphin@udel.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="state">Delaware</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rankin, M K" sort="Rankin, M K" uniqKey="Rankin M" first="M K" last="Rankin">M K Rankin</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Johnson, K J" sort="Johnson, K J" uniqKey="Johnson K" first="K J" last="Johnson">K J Johnson</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Benson, E R" sort="Benson, E R" uniqKey="Benson E" first="E R" last="Benson">E R Benson</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:20521728</idno>
<idno type="pmid">20521728</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1637/8764-033109-Reg.1</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000688</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000688</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000685</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000685</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000696</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000696</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000382</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000382</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000382</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Alphin, R L" sort="Alphin, R L" uniqKey="Alphin R" first="R L" last="Alphin">R L Alphin</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150, USA. ralphin@udel.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="state">Delaware</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rankin, M K" sort="Rankin, M K" uniqKey="Rankin M" first="M K" last="Rankin">M K Rankin</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Johnson, K J" sort="Johnson, K J" uniqKey="Johnson K" first="K J" last="Johnson">K J Johnson</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Benson, E R" sort="Benson, E R" uniqKey="Benson E" first="E R" last="Benson">E R Benson</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Avian diseases</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0005-2086</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term>
<term>Carbon Dioxide</term>
<term>Chickens</term>
<term>Euthanasia, Animal (methods)</term>
<term>Flame Retardants</term>
<term>Influenza in Birds (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Water</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux</term>
<term>Dioxyde de carbone</term>
<term>Eau</term>
<term>Euthanasie animale ()</term>
<term>Grippe chez les oiseaux ()</term>
<term>Ignifuges</term>
<term>Poulets</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Carbon Dioxide</term>
<term>Flame Retardants</term>
<term>Water</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Euthanasia, Animal</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza in Birds</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term>
<term>Chickens</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Animaux</term>
<term>Dioxyde de carbone</term>
<term>Eau</term>
<term>Euthanasie animale</term>
<term>Grippe chez les oiseaux</term>
<term>Ignifuges</term>
<term>Poulets</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Current control strategies for avian influenza (AI) and other highly contagious poultry diseases include surveillance, quarantine, depopulation, disposal, and decontamination. Selection of the best method of emergency mass depopulation involves maximizing human health and safety while minimizing disease spread and animal welfare concerns. Proper selection must ensure that the method is compatible with the species, age, housing type, and disposal options. No one single method is appropriate for all situations. Gassing is one of the accepted methods for euthanatizing poultry. Whole-house, partial-house, or containerized gassing procedures are currently used. The use of water-based foam was developed for emergency mass depopulation and was conditionally approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in 2006. Research has been done comparing these different methods; parameters such as time to brain death, consistency of time to brain death, and pretreatment and posttreatment corticosterone stress levels were considered. In Europe, the use of foam with carbon dioxide is preferred over conventional water-based foam. A recent experiment comparing CO2 gas, foam with CO2 gas, and foam without CO2 gas depopulation methods was conducted with the use of electroencephalometry results. Foam was as consistent as CO2 gassing and more consistent than argon-CO2 gassing. There were no statistically significant differences between foam methods.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region><li>Delaware</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Benson, E R" sort="Benson, E R" uniqKey="Benson E" first="E R" last="Benson">E R Benson</name>
<name sortKey="Johnson, K J" sort="Johnson, K J" uniqKey="Johnson K" first="K J" last="Johnson">K J Johnson</name>
<name sortKey="Rankin, M K" sort="Rankin, M K" uniqKey="Rankin M" first="M K" last="Rankin">M K Rankin</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="États-Unis"><region name="Delaware"><name sortKey="Alphin, R L" sort="Alphin, R L" uniqKey="Alphin R" first="R L" last="Alphin">R L Alphin</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/StressCovidV1/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000382 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000382 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Sante |area= StressCovidV1 |flux= Ncbi |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:20521728 |texte= Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20521728" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a StressCovidV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |