Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.
Identifieur interne : 000688 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000687; suivant : 000689Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.
Auteurs : R L Alphin ; M K Rankin ; K J Johnson ; E R BensonSource :
- Avian diseases [ 0005-2086 ] ; 2010.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Carbon Dioxide, Flame Retardants, Water.
- methods : Euthanasia, Animal.
- prevention & control : Influenza in Birds.
- Animals, Chickens.
Abstract
Current control strategies for avian influenza (AI) and other highly contagious poultry diseases include surveillance, quarantine, depopulation, disposal, and decontamination. Selection of the best method of emergency mass depopulation involves maximizing human health and safety while minimizing disease spread and animal welfare concerns. Proper selection must ensure that the method is compatible with the species, age, housing type, and disposal options. No one single method is appropriate for all situations. Gassing is one of the accepted methods for euthanatizing poultry. Whole-house, partial-house, or containerized gassing procedures are currently used. The use of water-based foam was developed for emergency mass depopulation and was conditionally approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in 2006. Research has been done comparing these different methods; parameters such as time to brain death, consistency of time to brain death, and pretreatment and posttreatment corticosterone stress levels were considered. In Europe, the use of foam with carbon dioxide is preferred over conventional water-based foam. A recent experiment comparing CO2 gas, foam with CO2 gas, and foam without CO2 gas depopulation methods was conducted with the use of electroencephalometry results. Foam was as consistent as CO2 gassing and more consistent than argon-CO2 gassing. There were no statistically significant differences between foam methods.
DOI: 10.1637/8764-033109-Reg.1
PubMed: 20521728
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20521728Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.</title><author><name sortKey="Alphin, R L" sort="Alphin, R L" uniqKey="Alphin R" first="R L" last="Alphin">R L Alphin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150, USA. ralphin@udel.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rankin, M K" sort="Rankin, M K" uniqKey="Rankin M" first="M K" last="Rankin">M K Rankin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, K J" sort="Johnson, K J" uniqKey="Johnson K" first="K J" last="Johnson">K J Johnson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Benson, E R" sort="Benson, E R" uniqKey="Benson E" first="E R" last="Benson">E R Benson</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20521728</idno><idno type="pmid">20521728</idno><idno type="doi">10.1637/8764-033109-Reg.1</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000688</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000688</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.</title><author><name sortKey="Alphin, R L" sort="Alphin, R L" uniqKey="Alphin R" first="R L" last="Alphin">R L Alphin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150, USA. ralphin@udel.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rankin, M K" sort="Rankin, M K" uniqKey="Rankin M" first="M K" last="Rankin">M K Rankin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, K J" sort="Johnson, K J" uniqKey="Johnson K" first="K J" last="Johnson">K J Johnson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Benson, E R" sort="Benson, E R" uniqKey="Benson E" first="E R" last="Benson">E R Benson</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Avian diseases</title><idno type="ISSN">0005-2086</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Carbon Dioxide</term><term>Chickens</term><term>Euthanasia, Animal (methods)</term><term>Flame Retardants</term><term>Influenza in Birds (prevention & control)</term><term>Water</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Carbon Dioxide</term><term>Flame Retardants</term><term>Water</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Euthanasia, Animal</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza in Birds</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Chickens</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Current control strategies for avian influenza (AI) and other highly contagious poultry diseases include surveillance, quarantine, depopulation, disposal, and decontamination. Selection of the best method of emergency mass depopulation involves maximizing human health and safety while minimizing disease spread and animal welfare concerns. Proper selection must ensure that the method is compatible with the species, age, housing type, and disposal options. No one single method is appropriate for all situations. Gassing is one of the accepted methods for euthanatizing poultry. Whole-house, partial-house, or containerized gassing procedures are currently used. The use of water-based foam was developed for emergency mass depopulation and was conditionally approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in 2006. Research has been done comparing these different methods; parameters such as time to brain death, consistency of time to brain death, and pretreatment and posttreatment corticosterone stress levels were considered. In Europe, the use of foam with carbon dioxide is preferred over conventional water-based foam. A recent experiment comparing CO2 gas, foam with CO2 gas, and foam without CO2 gas depopulation methods was conducted with the use of electroencephalometry results. Foam was as consistent as CO2 gassing and more consistent than argon-CO2 gassing. There were no statistically significant differences between foam methods.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20521728</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>21</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0005-2086</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>54</Volume><Issue>1 Suppl</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Avian diseases</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Avian Dis.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>757-62</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Current control strategies for avian influenza (AI) and other highly contagious poultry diseases include surveillance, quarantine, depopulation, disposal, and decontamination. Selection of the best method of emergency mass depopulation involves maximizing human health and safety while minimizing disease spread and animal welfare concerns. Proper selection must ensure that the method is compatible with the species, age, housing type, and disposal options. No one single method is appropriate for all situations. Gassing is one of the accepted methods for euthanatizing poultry. Whole-house, partial-house, or containerized gassing procedures are currently used. The use of water-based foam was developed for emergency mass depopulation and was conditionally approved by the United States Department of Agriculture in 2006. Research has been done comparing these different methods; parameters such as time to brain death, consistency of time to brain death, and pretreatment and posttreatment corticosterone stress levels were considered. In Europe, the use of foam with carbon dioxide is preferred over conventional water-based foam. A recent experiment comparing CO2 gas, foam with CO2 gas, and foam without CO2 gas depopulation methods was conducted with the use of electroencephalometry results. Foam was as consistent as CO2 gassing and more consistent than argon-CO2 gassing. There were no statistically significant differences between foam methods.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Alphin</LastName><ForeName>R L</ForeName><Initials>RL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Avian Bioscience Center, University of Delaware, 107 C. C. Allen Biotechnology Laboratory, Newark, DE 19716-2150, USA. ralphin@udel.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rankin</LastName><ForeName>M K</ForeName><Initials>MK</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Johnson</LastName><ForeName>K J</ForeName><Initials>KJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Benson</LastName><ForeName>E R</ForeName><Initials>ER</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D018848">Controlled Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Avian Dis</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0370617</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0005-2086</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D005411">Flame Retardants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>059QF0KO0R</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014867">Water</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>142M471B3J</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002245">Carbon Dioxide</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002245" MajorTopicYN="Y">Carbon Dioxide</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002645" MajorTopicYN="Y">Chickens</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D037901" MajorTopicYN="N">Euthanasia, Animal</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005411" MajorTopicYN="N">Flame Retardants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005585" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza in Birds</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="N">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014867" MajorTopicYN="Y">Water</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20521728</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1637/8764-033109-Reg.1</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/StressCovidV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000688 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000688 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= StressCovidV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20521728
|texte= Comparison of water-based foam and inert-gas mass emergency depopulation methods.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20521728" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a StressCovidV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |