Serveur d'exploration SRAS

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Are Mechanistic and Statistical QSAR Approaches Really Different? MLR Studies on 158 Cycloalkyl‐Pyranones

Identifieur interne : 002876 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002875; suivant : 002877

Are Mechanistic and Statistical QSAR Approaches Really Different? MLR Studies on 158 Cycloalkyl‐Pyranones

Auteurs : Barun Bhhatarai [États-Unis, Italie] ; Rajni Garg [États-Unis] ; Paola Gramatica [Italie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:CD540F2B0371D77BC33ADE4264C3A3AB1FDBB243

English descriptors

Abstract

Two parallel approaches for quantitative structure‐activity relationships (QSAR) are predominant in literature, one guided by mechanistic methods (including read‐across) and another by the use of statistical methods. To bridge the gap between these two approaches and to verify their main differences, a comparative study of mechanistically relevant and statistically relevant QSAR models, developed on a case study of 158 cycloalkyl‐pyranones, biologically active on inhibition (Ki) of HIV protease, was performed. Firstly, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) based models were developed starting from a limited amount of molecular descriptors which were widely proven to have mechanistic interpretation. Then robust and predictive MLR models were developed on the same set using two different statistical approaches unbiased of input descriptors. Development of models based on Statistical I method was guided by stepwise addition of descriptors while Genetic Algorithm based selection of descriptors was used for the Statistical II. Internal validation, the standard error of the estimate, and Fisher’s significance test were performed for both the statistical models. In addition, external validation was performed for Statistical II model, and Applicability Domain was verified as normally practiced in this approach. The relationships between the activity and the important descriptors selected in all the models were analyzed and compared. It is concluded that, despite the different type and number of input descriptors, and the applied descriptor selection tools or the algorithms used for developing the final model, the mechanistical and statistical approach are comparable to each other in terms of quality and also for mechanistic interpretability of modelling descriptors. Agreement can be observed between these two approaches and the better result could be a consensus prediction from both the models.

Url:
DOI: 10.1002/minf.201000011


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Are Mechanistic and Statistical QSAR Approaches Really Different? MLR Studies on 158 Cycloalkyl‐Pyranones</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bhhatarai, Barun" sort="Bhhatarai, Barun" uniqKey="Bhhatarai B" first="Barun" last="Bhhatarai">Barun Bhhatarai</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Garg, Rajni" sort="Garg, Rajni" uniqKey="Garg R" first="Rajni" last="Garg">Rajni Garg</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gramatica, Paola" sort="Gramatica, Paola" uniqKey="Gramatica P" first="Paola" last="Gramatica">Paola Gramatica</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CD540F2B0371D77BC33ADE4264C3A3AB1FDBB243</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1002/minf.201000011</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-2T9K5QJJ-J/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B61</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B61</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001B61</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000B29</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000B29</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1868-1743:2010:Bhhatarai B:are:mechanistic:and</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002915</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002876</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002876</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Are Mechanistic and Statistical QSAR Approaches Really Different? MLR Studies on 158 Cycloalkyl‐Pyranones</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bhhatarai, Barun" sort="Bhhatarai, Barun" uniqKey="Bhhatarai B" first="Barun" last="Bhhatarai">Barun Bhhatarai</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chemistry and Bio‐molecular Science Department, Clarkson, University, Potsdam, NY, 13699‐5810</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>13699‐5810</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>QSAR Research Unit, Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Insubria, Varese, 21100</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>21100</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation></affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Garg, Rajni" sort="Garg, Rajni" uniqKey="Garg R" first="Rajni" last="Garg">Rajni Garg</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chemistry and Bio‐molecular Science Department, Clarkson, University, Potsdam, NY, 13699‐5810</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>13699‐5810</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Chemistry Department, California State University, San Marcos, CA</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gramatica, Paola" sort="Gramatica, Paola" uniqKey="Gramatica P" first="Paola" last="Gramatica">Paola Gramatica</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>QSAR Research Unit, Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of Insubria, Varese, 21100</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>21100</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Molecular Informatics</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">MOLECULAR INFORMATICS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1868-1743</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1868-1751</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6‐7</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="511">511</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="522">522</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">12</biblScope>
<publisher>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</publisher>
<pubPlace>Weinheim</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-07-12">2010-07-12</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1868-1743</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1868-1743</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Algorithm</term>
<term>Barun</term>
<term>Benzene rings</term>
<term>Bhhatarai</term>
<term>Bmlr</term>
<term>Chance correlation</term>
<term>Chem</term>
<term>Comparative analysis</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Correlation coefficient</term>
<term>Dataset</term>
<term>Descriptor</term>
<term>Different approaches</term>
<term>Different splitting</term>
<term>External predictivity</term>
<term>External validation</term>
<term>Final model</term>
<term>Full paper barun bhhatarai</term>
<term>Garg</term>
<term>Genetic algorithm</term>
<term>Gmbh</term>
<term>Heuristic</term>
<term>Heuristic method</term>
<term>Implicit hydrogens</term>
<term>Important descriptors</term>
<term>Input descriptors</term>
<term>Internal validation</term>
<term>Kgaa</term>
<term>Mechanistic</term>
<term>Mechanistic basis</term>
<term>Mechanistic interpretation</term>
<term>Mechanistical</term>
<term>Mechanistically</term>
<term>Model development</term>
<term>Oecd principles</term>
<term>Outlier</term>
<term>Prediction plot</term>
<term>Predictivity</term>
<term>Predictivity check</term>
<term>Qsar</term>
<term>Qsar comb</term>
<term>Qsar models</term>
<term>Regression models</term>
<term>Relative number</term>
<term>Robustness</term>
<term>Software</term>
<term>Splitting</term>
<term>Splitting criteria</term>
<term>Statistical approach</term>
<term>Statistical approaches</term>
<term>Statistical parameters</term>
<term>Statistical qsar approaches</term>
<term>Validation</term>
<term>Variable selection</term>
<term>Verlag</term>
<term>Verlag gmbh</term>
<term>Weinheim</term>
<term>Williams plot</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Two parallel approaches for quantitative structure‐activity relationships (QSAR) are predominant in literature, one guided by mechanistic methods (including read‐across) and another by the use of statistical methods. To bridge the gap between these two approaches and to verify their main differences, a comparative study of mechanistically relevant and statistically relevant QSAR models, developed on a case study of 158 cycloalkyl‐pyranones, biologically active on inhibition (Ki) of HIV protease, was performed. Firstly, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) based models were developed starting from a limited amount of molecular descriptors which were widely proven to have mechanistic interpretation. Then robust and predictive MLR models were developed on the same set using two different statistical approaches unbiased of input descriptors. Development of models based on Statistical I method was guided by stepwise addition of descriptors while Genetic Algorithm based selection of descriptors was used for the Statistical II. Internal validation, the standard error of the estimate, and Fisher’s significance test were performed for both the statistical models. In addition, external validation was performed for Statistical II model, and Applicability Domain was verified as normally practiced in this approach. The relationships between the activity and the important descriptors selected in all the models were analyzed and compared. It is concluded that, despite the different type and number of input descriptors, and the applied descriptor selection tools or the algorithms used for developing the final model, the mechanistical and statistical approach are comparable to each other in terms of quality and also for mechanistic interpretability of modelling descriptors. Agreement can be observed between these two approaches and the better result could be a consensus prediction from both the models.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Italie</li>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Californie</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Bhhatarai, Barun" sort="Bhhatarai, Barun" uniqKey="Bhhatarai B" first="Barun" last="Bhhatarai">Barun Bhhatarai</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Garg, Rajni" sort="Garg, Rajni" uniqKey="Garg R" first="Rajni" last="Garg">Rajni Garg</name>
<name sortKey="Garg, Rajni" sort="Garg, Rajni" uniqKey="Garg R" first="Rajni" last="Garg">Rajni Garg</name>
</country>
<country name="Italie">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Bhhatarai, Barun" sort="Bhhatarai, Barun" uniqKey="Bhhatarai B" first="Barun" last="Bhhatarai">Barun Bhhatarai</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Gramatica, Paola" sort="Gramatica, Paola" uniqKey="Gramatica P" first="Paola" last="Gramatica">Paola Gramatica</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002876 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002876 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:CD540F2B0371D77BC33ADE4264C3A3AB1FDBB243
   |texte=   Are Mechanistic and Statistical QSAR Approaches Really Different? MLR Studies on 158 Cycloalkyl‐Pyranones
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021