Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions
Identifieur interne : 000934 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000933; suivant : 000935Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions
Auteurs : A. L. BasoloSource :
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences [ 0962-8452 ] ; 1998.
Abstract
Female poeciliid fishes of the sister genera Xiphophorus and Priapella share a preference for males with swords, despite phylogenetic information suggesting that swords arose in Xiphophorus after the divergence of the two genera. This study examines the strength of sword and bodysize preferences in a representative of both genera. A comparison of the preference functions reveals that the strength of the preference favouring a sword in P. olmecae is significantly stronger than that in X. helleri. This result demonstrates that the preexisting bias is not evolutionarily fixed, and that there has been change in the bias favouring the sword, in either the Priapella lineage, or the Xiphophorus lineage, or in both. Although females in both species prefer conspecific males with swords, only X. helleri females also demonstrate a bodysize preference. The preference functions for body size and sword length for X. helleri are not significantly different, whereas in P. olmecae the preference function for sword length is significantly stronger than for body size. These combined results indicate that an ancestral bias for body size cannot alone explain the preexisting bias favouring a sword in P. olmecae.
Url:
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0563
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:18FFC6EF17B34EAD3655424A217C5D617A4B4222Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</title><author><name sortKey="Basolo, A L" sort="Basolo, A L" uniqKey="Basolo A" first="A. L." last="Basolo">A. L. Basolo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA (basolo@niko.unl.edu)</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:18FFC6EF17B34EAD3655424A217C5D617A4B4222</idno><date when="1998" year="1998">1998</date><idno type="doi">10.1098/rspb.1998.0563</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000934</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000934</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</title><author><name sortKey="Basolo, A L" sort="Basolo, A L" uniqKey="Basolo A" first="A. L." last="Basolo">A. L. Basolo</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA (basolo@niko.unl.edu)</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</title><idno type="ISSN">0962-8452</idno><imprint><publisher>The Royal Society</publisher><date type="published">1998</date><biblScope unit="vol">265</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1411</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="2223">2223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="2228">2228</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0962-8452</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0962-8452</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Female poeciliid fishes of the sister genera Xiphophorus and Priapella share a preference for males with swords, despite phylogenetic information suggesting that swords arose in Xiphophorus after the divergence of the two genera. This study examines the strength of sword and bodysize preferences in a representative of both genera. A comparison of the preference functions reveals that the strength of the preference favouring a sword in P. olmecae is significantly stronger than that in X. helleri. This result demonstrates that the preexisting bias is not evolutionarily fixed, and that there has been change in the bias favouring the sword, in either the Priapella lineage, or the Xiphophorus lineage, or in both. Although females in both species prefer conspecific males with swords, only X. helleri females also demonstrate a bodysize preference. The preference functions for body size and sword length for X. helleri are not significantly different, whereas in P. olmecae the preference function for sword length is significantly stronger than for body size. These combined results indicate that an ancestral bias for body size cannot alone explain the preexisting bias favouring a sword in P. olmecae.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>rsl</corpusName><author><json:item><name>A. L. Basolo</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA (basolo@niko.unl.edu)</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>preference function</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>preexisting receiver biases</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sexual selection</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mate choice</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>poeciliids</value></json:item></subject><arkIstex>ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Female poeciliid fishes of the sister genera Xiphophorus and Priapella share a preference for males with swords, despite phylogenetic information suggesting that swords arose in Xiphophorus after the divergence of the two genera. This study examines the strength of sword and bodysize preferences in a representative of both genera. A comparison of the preference functions reveals that the strength of the preference favouring a sword in P. olmecae is significantly stronger than that in X. helleri. This result demonstrates that the preexisting bias is not evolutionarily fixed, and that there has been change in the bias favouring the sword, in either the Priapella lineage, or the Xiphophorus lineage, or in both. Although females in both species prefer conspecific males with swords, only X. helleri females also demonstrate a bodysize preference. The preference functions for body size and sword length for X. helleri are not significantly different, whereas in P. olmecae the preference function for sword length is significantly stronger than for body size. These combined results indicate that an ancestral bias for body size cannot alone explain the preexisting bias favouring a sword in P. olmecae.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.899</score><pdfWordCount>7584</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>44508</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>598 x 844 pts</pdfPageSize><pdfWordsPerPage>758</pdfWordsPerPage><pdfText>true</pdfText><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>186</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1209</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>5</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><issn><json:string>0962-8452</json:string></issn><volume>265</volume><issue>1411</issue><pages><first>2223</first><last>2228</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - evolutionary biology</json:string><json:string>2 - ecology</json:string><json:string>2 - biology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Agricultural and Biological Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - General Agricultural and Biological Sciences</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Environmental Science</json:string><json:string>3 - General Environmental Science</json:string><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Immunology and Microbiology</json:string><json:string>3 - General Immunology and Microbiology</json:string><json:string>1 - Life Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology</json:string><json:string>3 - General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology</json:string><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - General Medicine</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences biologiques fondamentales et appliquees. psychologie</json:string><json:string>4 - ethologie animale</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1998</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1998</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1098/rspb.1998.0563</json:string></doi><id>18FFC6EF17B34EAD3655424A217C5D617A4B4222</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>The Royal Society</publisher><date type="published">1998</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" source="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="publication-type" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><surname>Basolo</surname><forename type="first">A. L.</forename></persName><email>basolo@niko.unl.edu</email><affiliation><orgName type="institution">University of Nebraska-Lincoln</orgName><address><addrLine>Lincoln, NE 68588</addrLine><country key="US" xml:lang="en">UNITED STATES</country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">18FFC6EF17B34EAD3655424A217C5D617A4B4222</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1098/rspb.1998.0563</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</title><idno type="hwp">royprsb</idno><idno type="pISSN">0962-8452</idno><imprint><publisher>The Royal Society</publisher><date type="published">1998</date><biblScope unit="vol">265</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1411</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="2223">2223</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="2228">2228</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><encodingDesc><schemaRef type="ODD" url="https://xml-schema.delivery.istex.fr/tei-istex.odd"></schemaRef><appInfo><application ident="pub2tei" version="1.0.40" when="2020-03-31"><label>pub2TEI-ISTEX</label><desc>A set of style sheets for converting XML documents encoded in various scientific publisher formats into a common TEI format.
<ref target="http://www.tei-c.org/">We use TEI</ref></desc></application></appInfo></encodingDesc><profileDesc><abstract><p>Female poeciliid fishes of the sister genera <hi rend="italic">Xiphophorus</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Priapella</hi> share a preference for males with swords, despite phylogenetic information suggesting that swords arose in <hi rend="italic">Xiphophorus</hi> after the divergence of the two genera. This study examines the strength of sword and body–size preferences in a representative of both genera. A comparison of the preference functions reveals that the strength of the preference favouring a sword in <hi rend="italic">P. olmecae</hi> is significantly stronger than that in <hi rend="italic">X. helleri</hi>. This result demonstrates that the pre–existing bias is not evolutionarily fixed, and that there has been change in the bias favouring the sword, in either the <hi rend="italic">Priapella</hi> lineage, or the <hi rend="italic">Xiphophorus</hi> lineage, or in both. Although females in both species prefer conspecific males with swords, only <hi rend="italic">X. helleri</hi> females also demonstrate a body–size preference. The preference functions for body size and sword length for <hi rend="italic">X. helleri</hi> are not significantly different, whereas in <hi rend="italic">P. olmecae</hi> the preference function for sword length is significantly stronger than for body size. These combined results indicate that an ancestral bias for body size cannot alone explain the pre–existing bias favouring a sword in <hi rend="italic">P. olmecae</hi>.</p></abstract><textClass ana="keyword"><keywords><term>preference function</term><term>pre–existing receiver biases</term><term>sexual selection</term><term>mate choice</term><term>poeciliids</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2020-03-31" who="#istex" xml:id="pub2tei">formatting</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2020-04-3">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus rsl not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">royprsb</journal-id><journal-title>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0962-8452</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Royal Society</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.1998.0563</article-id><title-group><article-title>Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Basolo</surname><given-names>A. L.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>1</label><institution>University of Nebraska-Lincoln</institution>, <addr-line>Lincoln, NE 68588</addr-line>, <country>USA</country> (<email>basolo@niko.unl.edu</email>)</aff><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>1998</year></pub-date><volume>265</volume><issue>1411</issue><fpage>2223</fpage><lpage>2228</lpage><abstract><p>Female poeciliid fishes of the sister genera <italic>Xiphophorus</italic> and <italic>Priapella</italic> share a preference for males with swords, despite phylogenetic information suggesting that swords arose in <italic>Xiphophorus</italic> after the divergence of the two genera. This study examines the strength of sword and body–size preferences in a representative of both genera. A comparison of the preference functions reveals that the strength of the preference favouring a sword in <italic>P. olmecae</italic> is significantly stronger than that in <italic>X. helleri</italic>. This result demonstrates that the pre–existing bias is not evolutionarily fixed, and that there has been change in the bias favouring the sword, in either the <italic>Priapella</italic> lineage, or the <italic>Xiphophorus</italic> lineage, or in both. Although females in both species prefer conspecific males with swords, only <italic>X. helleri</italic> females also demonstrate a body–size preference. The preference functions for body size and sword length for <italic>X. helleri</italic> are not significantly different, whereas in <italic>P. olmecae</italic> the preference function for sword length is significantly stronger than for body size. These combined results indicate that an ancestral bias for body size cannot alone explain the pre–existing bias favouring a sword in <italic>P. olmecae</italic>.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>preference function</kwd><kwd>pre–existing receiver biases</kwd><kwd>sexual selection</kwd><kwd>mate choice</kwd><kwd>poeciliids</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A. L.</namePart><namePart type="family">Basolo</namePart><affiliation>University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA (basolo@niko.unl.edu)</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>The Royal Society</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-11-22</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Female poeciliid fishes of the sister genera Xiphophorus and Priapella share a preference for males with swords, despite phylogenetic information suggesting that swords arose in Xiphophorus after the divergence of the two genera. This study examines the strength of sword and bodysize preferences in a representative of both genera. A comparison of the preference functions reveals that the strength of the preference favouring a sword in P. olmecae is significantly stronger than that in X. helleri. This result demonstrates that the preexisting bias is not evolutionarily fixed, and that there has been change in the bias favouring the sword, in either the Priapella lineage, or the Xiphophorus lineage, or in both. Although females in both species prefer conspecific males with swords, only X. helleri females also demonstrate a bodysize preference. The preference functions for body size and sword length for X. helleri are not significantly different, whereas in P. olmecae the preference function for sword length is significantly stronger than for body size. These combined results indicate that an ancestral bias for body size cannot alone explain the preexisting bias favouring a sword in P. olmecae.</abstract><subject><topic>preference function</topic><topic>preexisting receiver biases</topic><topic>sexual selection</topic><topic>mate choice</topic><topic>poeciliids</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0962-8452</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">royprsb</identifier><part><date>1998</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>265</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1411</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>2223</start><end>2228</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">18FFC6EF17B34EAD3655424A217C5D617A4B4222</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1098/rspb.1998.0563</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© Royal Society of London. All rights reserved.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-W19DTZ70-2">RSL</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Converted from (version 1.2.10) to MODS version 3.6.</recordOrigin><recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2020-04-03</recordCreationDate></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/V84-72LC6RGP-5/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000934 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000934 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SrasV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:18FFC6EF17B34EAD3655424A217C5D617A4B4222
|texte= Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |