Determinants of condom use intentions of university students in Ghana : an application of the theory of reasoned action
Identifieur interne : 000122 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000121; suivant : 000123Determinants of condom use intentions of university students in Ghana : an application of the theory of reasoned action
Auteurs : Kwadwo Bosompra [États-Unis]Source :
- Social science & medicine : (1982) [ 0277-9536 ] ; 2001.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- geographic : Ghana.
- topic : Homme, Santé publique.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The study examined the applicability of the Theory of Reasoned Action to the study of condom use intentions of students at a university in southern Ghana. The data supported the model, explaining 33% of the variance in students' condom use intentions. Subjective norms and the perceived disadvantages of condom use were significant determinants of intention, with the former being more important. Respondents who intended to use condoms consistently ("intenders") and those with no such intentions ("non-intenders") were equally motivated to comply with the wishes of their significant referents (sexual partners, close friends, parents and medical doctors). The critical difference was that "intenders" consistently held a stronger belief than "non-intenders" that their significant referents approved of condom use. Significantly, whereas "intenders" believed that their sexual partners would approve of condom use, the "non-intenders" held the contrary belief that their partners would disapprove of such behavior. This suggests that AIDS education interventions targeting a similar audience like the university students in this study should shift their foci away from individuals alone and instead, focus simultaneously on individuals, their sexual partners and their broader social networks in order to enhance perceptions of peer acceptance of condom use.
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:01-0235127Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determinants of condom use intentions of university students in Ghana : an application of the theory of reasoned action</title><author><name sortKey="Bosompra, Kwadwo" sort="Bosompra, Kwadwo" uniqKey="Bosompra K" first="Kwadwo" last="Bosompra">Kwadwo Bosompra</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical Biostatistics Department, University of Vermont, 25C Hills Building</s1><s2>Burlington, VT 05405</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Vermont</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">01-0235127</idno><date when="2001">2001</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 01-0235127 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:01-0235127</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000140</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000009</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000122</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000122</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determinants of condom use intentions of university students in Ghana : an application of the theory of reasoned action</title><author><name sortKey="Bosompra, Kwadwo" sort="Bosompra, Kwadwo" uniqKey="Bosompra K" first="Kwadwo" last="Bosompra">Kwadwo Bosompra</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical Biostatistics Department, University of Vermont, 25C Hills Building</s1><s2>Burlington, VT 05405</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Vermont</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Social science & medicine : (1982)</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Soc. sci. med. : (1982)</title><idno type="ISSN">0277-9536</idno><imprint><date when="2001">2001</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Social science & medicine : (1982)</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Soc. sci. med. : (1982)</title><idno type="ISSN">0277-9536</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>AIDS</term><term>Attitude</term><term>Condom</term><term>Ghana</term><term>Health education</term><term>Human</term><term>Intention</term><term>Public health</term><term>Sexual behavior</term><term>Student</term><term>University environment</term><term>Use</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Condom</term><term>Utilisation</term><term>Intention</term><term>Milieu universitaire</term><term>Etudiant</term><term>Ghana</term><term>SIDA</term><term>Education santé</term><term>Comportement sexuel</term><term>Attitude</term><term>Homme</term><term>Santé publique</term><term>Théorie action raisonnée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ghana</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term><term>Santé publique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The study examined the applicability of the Theory of Reasoned Action to the study of condom use intentions of students at a university in southern Ghana. The data supported the model, explaining 33% of the variance in students' condom use intentions. Subjective norms and the perceived disadvantages of condom use were significant determinants of intention, with the former being more important. Respondents who intended to use condoms consistently ("intenders") and those with no such intentions ("non-intenders") were equally motivated to comply with the wishes of their significant referents (sexual partners, close friends, parents and medical doctors). The critical difference was that "intenders" consistently held a stronger belief than "non-intenders" that their significant referents approved of condom use. Significantly, whereas "intenders" believed that their sexual partners would approve of condom use, the "non-intenders" held the contrary belief that their partners would disapprove of such behavior. This suggests that AIDS education interventions targeting a similar audience like the university students in this study should shift their foci away from individuals alone and instead, focus simultaneously on individuals, their sexual partners and their broader social networks in order to enhance perceptions of peer acceptance of condom use.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0277-9536</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>SSMDEP</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Soc. sci. med. : (1982)</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>52</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>7</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Determinants of condom use intentions of university students in Ghana : an application of the theory of reasoned action</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BOSOMPRA (Kwadwo)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Medical Biostatistics Department, University of Vermont, 25C Hills Building</s1><s2>Burlington, VT 05405</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>1057-1069</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2001</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>13689</s2><s5>354000097465960070</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2001 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>1 p.3/4</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>01-0235127</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Social science & medicine : (1982)</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The study examined the applicability of the Theory of Reasoned Action to the study of condom use intentions of students at a university in southern Ghana. The data supported the model, explaining 33% of the variance in students' condom use intentions. Subjective norms and the perceived disadvantages of condom use were significant determinants of intention, with the former being more important. Respondents who intended to use condoms consistently ("intenders") and those with no such intentions ("non-intenders") were equally motivated to comply with the wishes of their significant referents (sexual partners, close friends, parents and medical doctors). The critical difference was that "intenders" consistently held a stronger belief than "non-intenders" that their significant referents approved of condom use. Significantly, whereas "intenders" believed that their sexual partners would approve of condom use, the "non-intenders" held the contrary belief that their partners would disapprove of such behavior. This suggests that AIDS education interventions targeting a similar audience like the university students in this study should shift their foci away from individuals alone and instead, focus simultaneously on individuals, their sexual partners and their broader social networks in order to enhance perceptions of peer acceptance of condom use.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B30A03C</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Condom</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Condom</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Condón</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Utilisation</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Use</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Utilización</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Intention</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intention</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Intencíon</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Milieu universitaire</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>University environment</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Medio universitario</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etudiant</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Student</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudiante</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ghana</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>12</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ghana</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>12</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ghana</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>12</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>SIDA</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>AIDS</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>SIDA</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Education santé</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Health education</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Educación sanitaria</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Comportement sexuel</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sexual behavior</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Conducta sexual</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Attitude</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Attitude</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Actitud</s0><s5>16</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0><s5>17</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Santé publique</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Public health</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Salud pública</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Théorie action raisonnée</s0><s4>INC</s4><s5>86</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Afrique</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Africa</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Africa</s0><s2>NG</s2></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virose</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Viral disease</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Virosis</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Infection</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Infection</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Infección</s0></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Immunopathologie</s0><s5>69</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Immunopathology</s0><s5>69</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Inmunopatología</s0><s5>69</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Immunodéficit</s0><s5>70</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Immune deficiency</s0><s5>70</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Inmunodeficiencia</s0><s5>70</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>162</s1></fN21></pA></standard></inist><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Vermont</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Vermont"><name sortKey="Bosompra, Kwadwo" sort="Bosompra, Kwadwo" uniqKey="Bosompra K" first="Kwadwo" last="Bosompra">Kwadwo Bosompra</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaGhanaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000122 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000122 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaGhanaV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:01-0235127
|texte= Determinants of condom use intentions of university students in Ghana : an application of the theory of reasoned action
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |