Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
Identifieur interne : 000702 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000701; suivant : 000703Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
Auteurs : Emerson Sebastião ; Brian M. Sandroff ; Yvonne C. Learmonth ; Robert W. MotlSource :
- Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation [ 1532-821X ] ; 2016.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH), Disability Evaluation (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Male (MeSH), Mobility Limitation (MeSH), Multiple Sclerosis (rehabilitation), Physical Therapy Modalities (standards), Postural Balance (MeSH), Reproducibility of Results (MeSH), Self Efficacy (MeSH), Walking (MeSH).
- MESH :
- rehabilitation : Multiple Sclerosis.
- standards : Physical Therapy Modalities.
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Mobility Limitation, Postural Balance, Reproducibility of Results, Self Efficacy, Walking.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To examine the validity of the timed Up and Go (TUG) test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) by using a comprehensive framework based on construct validity (ie, convergent and divergent validity).
DESIGN
Cross-sectional study.
SETTING
Hospital setting.
PARTICIPANTS
Community-residing persons with MS (N=47).
INTERVENTIONS
Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Main outcome measures included the TUG test, timed 25-foot walk test, 6-minute walk test, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, posturography evaluation, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Symbol Digits Modalities Test, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and the number of steps taken per day.
RESULTS
The TUG test was strongly associated with other valid outcome measures of ambulatory mobility (Spearman rank correlation, rs=.71-.90) and disability status (rs=.80), moderately to strongly associated with balance confidence (rs=.66), and weakly associated with postural control (ie, balance) (rs=.31). The TUG test was moderately associated with cognitive processing speed (rs=.59), but not associated with other nonambulatory measures (ie, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument-upper extremity function).
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings support the validity of the TUG test as a measure of functional mobility. This warrants its inclusion in patients' assessment alongside other valid measures of functional mobility in both clinical and research practice in persons with MS.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031
PubMed: 26944709
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26944709Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.</title><author><name sortKey="Sebastiao, Emerson" sort="Sebastiao, Emerson" uniqKey="Sebastiao E" first="Emerson" last="Sebastião">Emerson Sebastião</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sandroff, Brian M" sort="Sandroff, Brian M" uniqKey="Sandroff B" first="Brian M" last="Sandroff">Brian M. Sandroff</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Learmonth, Yvonne C" sort="Learmonth, Yvonne C" uniqKey="Learmonth Y" first="Yvonne C" last="Learmonth">Yvonne C. Learmonth</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Motl, Robert W" sort="Motl, Robert W" uniqKey="Motl R" first="Robert W" last="Motl">Robert W. Motl</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. Electronic address: robmotl@illinois.edu.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26944709</idno><idno type="pmid">26944709</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000702</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000702</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.</title><author><name sortKey="Sebastiao, Emerson" sort="Sebastiao, Emerson" uniqKey="Sebastiao E" first="Emerson" last="Sebastião">Emerson Sebastião</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sandroff, Brian M" sort="Sandroff, Brian M" uniqKey="Sandroff B" first="Brian M" last="Sandroff">Brian M. Sandroff</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Learmonth, Yvonne C" sort="Learmonth, Yvonne C" uniqKey="Learmonth Y" first="Yvonne C" last="Learmonth">Yvonne C. Learmonth</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Motl, Robert W" sort="Motl, Robert W" uniqKey="Motl R" first="Robert W" last="Motl">Robert W. Motl</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. Electronic address: robmotl@illinois.edu.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><idno type="eISSN">1532-821X</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Disability Evaluation (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Mobility Limitation (MeSH)</term><term>Multiple Sclerosis (rehabilitation)</term><term>Physical Therapy Modalities (standards)</term><term>Postural Balance (MeSH)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results (MeSH)</term><term>Self Efficacy (MeSH)</term><term>Walking (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Multiple Sclerosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Physical Therapy Modalities</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Disability Evaluation</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mobility Limitation</term><term>Postural Balance</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Self Efficacy</term><term>Walking</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>OBJECTIVE</b></p><p>To examine the validity of the timed Up and Go (TUG) test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) by using a comprehensive framework based on construct validity (ie, convergent and divergent validity).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>DESIGN</b></p><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>SETTING</b></p><p>Hospital setting.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>PARTICIPANTS</b></p><p>Community-residing persons with MS (N=47).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>INTERVENTIONS</b></p><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES</b></p><p>Main outcome measures included the TUG test, timed 25-foot walk test, 6-minute walk test, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, posturography evaluation, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Symbol Digits Modalities Test, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and the number of steps taken per day.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>The TUG test was strongly associated with other valid outcome measures of ambulatory mobility (Spearman rank correlation, rs=.71-.90) and disability status (rs=.80), moderately to strongly associated with balance confidence (rs=.66), and weakly associated with postural control (ie, balance) (rs=.31). The TUG test was moderately associated with cognitive processing speed (rs=.59), but not associated with other nonambulatory measures (ie, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument-upper extremity function).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>Our findings support the validity of the TUG test as a measure of functional mobility. This warrants its inclusion in patients' assessment alongside other valid measures of functional mobility in both clinical and research practice in persons with MS.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">26944709</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>02</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1532-821X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>97</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>07</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1072-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0003-9993(16)00139-8</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE">To examine the validity of the timed Up and Go (TUG) test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) by using a comprehensive framework based on construct validity (ie, convergent and divergent validity).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="DESIGN">Cross-sectional study.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SETTING">Hospital setting.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PARTICIPANTS">Community-residing persons with MS (N=47).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="INTERVENTIONS">Not applicable.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES">Main outcome measures included the TUG test, timed 25-foot walk test, 6-minute walk test, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, posturography evaluation, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, Symbol Digits Modalities Test, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and the number of steps taken per day.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS">The TUG test was strongly associated with other valid outcome measures of ambulatory mobility (Spearman rank correlation, rs=.71-.90) and disability status (rs=.80), moderately to strongly associated with balance confidence (rs=.66), and weakly associated with postural control (ie, balance) (rs=.31). The TUG test was moderately associated with cognitive processing speed (rs=.59), but not associated with other nonambulatory measures (ie, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument-upper extremity function).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS">Our findings support the validity of the TUG test as a measure of functional mobility. This warrants its inclusion in patients' assessment alongside other valid measures of functional mobility in both clinical and research practice in persons with MS.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sebastião</LastName><ForeName>Emerson</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sandroff</LastName><ForeName>Brian M</ForeName><Initials>BM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Learmonth</LastName><ForeName>Yvonne C</ForeName><Initials>YC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Motl</LastName><ForeName>Robert W</ForeName><Initials>RW</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. Electronic address: robmotl@illinois.edu.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>02</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>2985158R</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0003-9993</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>AIM</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004185" MajorTopicYN="Y">Disability Evaluation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D051346" MajorTopicYN="N">Mobility Limitation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009103" MajorTopicYN="N">Multiple Sclerosis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D026741" MajorTopicYN="N">Physical Therapy Modalities</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004856" MajorTopicYN="N">Postural Balance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020377" MajorTopicYN="N">Self Efficacy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016138" MajorTopicYN="Y">Walking</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Mobility limitation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Multiple sclerosis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Rehabilitation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="Y">Validation studies</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2015</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>04</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>11</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26944709</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0003-9993(16)00139-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PosturoV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000702 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000702 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= PosturoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26944709
|texte= Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test as a Measure of Functional Mobility in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26944709" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PosturoV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |