Serveur d'exploration Posturo

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

How providing more or less time to solve a cognitive task interferes with upright stance control; a posturographic analysis on healthy young adults.

Identifieur interne : 000701 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000700; suivant : 000702

How providing more or less time to solve a cognitive task interferes with upright stance control; a posturographic analysis on healthy young adults.

Auteurs : Patrice R. Rougier ; Cédrick T. Bonnet

Source :

RBID : pubmed:26949920

English descriptors

Abstract

Contrasted postural effects have been reported in dual-task protocols associating balance control and cognitive task that could be explained by the nature and the relative difficulty of the cognitive task and the biomechanical significance of the force platform data. To better assess their respective role, eleven healthy young adults were required to stand upright quietly on a force platform while concomitantly solving mental-calculation or mental-navigation cognitive tasks. Various levels of difficulty were applied by adjusting the velocity rate at which the instructions were provided to the subject according to his/her maximal capacities measured beforehand. A condition without any concomitant cognitive task was added to constitute a baseline behavior. Two basic components, the horizontal center-of-gravity movements and the horizontal difference between center-of-gravity and center-of-pressures were computed from the complex center-of-pressure recorded movements. It was hypothesized that increasing the delay should infer less interaction between postural control and task solution. The results indicate that both mental-calculation and mental-navigation tasks induce reduced amplitudes for the center-of-pressure minus center-of-gravity movements, only along the mediolateral axis, whereas center-of-gravity movements were not affected, suggesting that different circuits are involved in the central nervous system to control these two movements. Moreover, increasing the delays task does not infer any effect for both movements. Since center-of-pressure minus center-of-gravity expresses the horizontal acceleration communicated to the center-of-gravity, one may assume that the control of the latter should be facilitated in dual-tasks conditions, inferring reduced center-of-gravity movements, which is not seen in our results. This lack of effect should be thus interpreted as a modification in the control of these center-of-gravity movements. Taken together, these results emphasized how undisturbed upright stance control can be impacted by mental tasks requiring attention, whatever their nature (calculation or navigation) and their relative difficulty. Depending on the provided instructions, i.e. focusing our attention on body movements or on the opposite diverting this attention toward other objectives, the evaluation of upright stance control capacities might be drastically altered.

DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.001
PubMed: 26949920

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:26949920

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">How providing more or less time to solve a cognitive task interferes with upright stance control; a posturographic analysis on healthy young adults.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rougier, Patrice R" sort="Rougier, Patrice R" uniqKey="Rougier P" first="Patrice R" last="Rougier">Patrice R. Rougier</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire de Physiologie de l'Exercice, EA4338, Université de Savoie, Domaine Scientifique de Savoie-Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac cedex, France. Electronic address: patrice.rougier@univ-savoie.fr.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bonnet, Cedrick T" sort="Bonnet, Cedrick T" uniqKey="Bonnet C" first="Cédrick T" last="Bonnet">Cédrick T. Bonnet</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et de Sciences Affectives, UMR CNRS 9193, Faculté de Médecine, pôle recherche, 59045 Lille, France.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2016">2016</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:26949920</idno>
<idno type="pmid">26949920</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.001</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000701</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000701</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">How providing more or less time to solve a cognitive task interferes with upright stance control; a posturographic analysis on healthy young adults.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rougier, Patrice R" sort="Rougier, Patrice R" uniqKey="Rougier P" first="Patrice R" last="Rougier">Patrice R. Rougier</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire de Physiologie de l'Exercice, EA4338, Université de Savoie, Domaine Scientifique de Savoie-Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac cedex, France. Electronic address: patrice.rougier@univ-savoie.fr.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bonnet, Cedrick T" sort="Bonnet, Cedrick T" uniqKey="Bonnet C" first="Cédrick T" last="Bonnet">Cédrick T. Bonnet</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et de Sciences Affectives, UMR CNRS 9193, Faculté de Médecine, pôle recherche, 59045 Lille, France.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Human movement science</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1872-7646</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2016" type="published">2016</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult (MeSH)</term>
<term>Attention (physiology)</term>
<term>Cognition (physiology)</term>
<term>Female (MeSH)</term>
<term>Humans (MeSH)</term>
<term>Male (MeSH)</term>
<term>Movement (MeSH)</term>
<term>Postural Balance (physiology)</term>
<term>Pressure (MeSH)</term>
<term>Time Factors (MeSH)</term>
<term>Young Adult (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Attention</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Postural Balance</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Movement</term>
<term>Pressure</term>
<term>Time Factors</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Contrasted postural effects have been reported in dual-task protocols associating balance control and cognitive task that could be explained by the nature and the relative difficulty of the cognitive task and the biomechanical significance of the force platform data. To better assess their respective role, eleven healthy young adults were required to stand upright quietly on a force platform while concomitantly solving mental-calculation or mental-navigation cognitive tasks. Various levels of difficulty were applied by adjusting the velocity rate at which the instructions were provided to the subject according to his/her maximal capacities measured beforehand. A condition without any concomitant cognitive task was added to constitute a baseline behavior. Two basic components, the horizontal center-of-gravity movements and the horizontal difference between center-of-gravity and center-of-pressures were computed from the complex center-of-pressure recorded movements. It was hypothesized that increasing the delay should infer less interaction between postural control and task solution. The results indicate that both mental-calculation and mental-navigation tasks induce reduced amplitudes for the center-of-pressure minus center-of-gravity movements, only along the mediolateral axis, whereas center-of-gravity movements were not affected, suggesting that different circuits are involved in the central nervous system to control these two movements. Moreover, increasing the delays task does not infer any effect for both movements. Since center-of-pressure minus center-of-gravity expresses the horizontal acceleration communicated to the center-of-gravity, one may assume that the control of the latter should be facilitated in dual-tasks conditions, inferring reduced center-of-gravity movements, which is not seen in our results. This lack of effect should be thus interpreted as a modification in the control of these center-of-gravity movements. Taken together, these results emphasized how undisturbed upright stance control can be impacted by mental tasks requiring attention, whatever their nature (calculation or navigation) and their relative difficulty. Depending on the provided instructions, i.e. focusing our attention on body movements or on the opposite diverting this attention toward other objectives, the evaluation of upright stance control capacities might be drastically altered. </div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">26949920</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1872-7646</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>47</Volume>
<PubDate>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Human movement science</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Hum Mov Sci</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>How providing more or less time to solve a cognitive task interferes with upright stance control; a posturographic analysis on healthy young adults.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>106-115</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0167-9457(16)30021-5</ELocationID>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.001</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Contrasted postural effects have been reported in dual-task protocols associating balance control and cognitive task that could be explained by the nature and the relative difficulty of the cognitive task and the biomechanical significance of the force platform data. To better assess their respective role, eleven healthy young adults were required to stand upright quietly on a force platform while concomitantly solving mental-calculation or mental-navigation cognitive tasks. Various levels of difficulty were applied by adjusting the velocity rate at which the instructions were provided to the subject according to his/her maximal capacities measured beforehand. A condition without any concomitant cognitive task was added to constitute a baseline behavior. Two basic components, the horizontal center-of-gravity movements and the horizontal difference between center-of-gravity and center-of-pressures were computed from the complex center-of-pressure recorded movements. It was hypothesized that increasing the delay should infer less interaction between postural control and task solution. The results indicate that both mental-calculation and mental-navigation tasks induce reduced amplitudes for the center-of-pressure minus center-of-gravity movements, only along the mediolateral axis, whereas center-of-gravity movements were not affected, suggesting that different circuits are involved in the central nervous system to control these two movements. Moreover, increasing the delays task does not infer any effect for both movements. Since center-of-pressure minus center-of-gravity expresses the horizontal acceleration communicated to the center-of-gravity, one may assume that the control of the latter should be facilitated in dual-tasks conditions, inferring reduced center-of-gravity movements, which is not seen in our results. This lack of effect should be thus interpreted as a modification in the control of these center-of-gravity movements. Taken together, these results emphasized how undisturbed upright stance control can be impacted by mental tasks requiring attention, whatever their nature (calculation or navigation) and their relative difficulty. Depending on the provided instructions, i.e. focusing our attention on body movements or on the opposite diverting this attention toward other objectives, the evaluation of upright stance control capacities might be drastically altered. </AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Rougier</LastName>
<ForeName>Patrice R</ForeName>
<Initials>PR</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Laboratoire de Physiologie de l'Exercice, EA4338, Université de Savoie, Domaine Scientifique de Savoie-Technolac, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac cedex, France. Electronic address: patrice.rougier@univ-savoie.fr.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Bonnet</LastName>
<ForeName>Cédrick T</ForeName>
<Initials>CT</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et de Sciences Affectives, UMR CNRS 9193, Faculté de Médecine, pôle recherche, 59045 Lille, France.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Netherlands</Country>
<MedlineTA>Hum Mov Sci</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8300127</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0167-9457</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001288" MajorTopicYN="N">Attention</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003071" MajorTopicYN="N">Cognition</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D009068" MajorTopicYN="Y">Movement</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004856" MajorTopicYN="N">Postural Balance</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011312" MajorTopicYN="N">Pressure</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Attention</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Center-of-gravity</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Center-of-pressure</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Postural control</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Task difficulty</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>8</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>8</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26949920</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S0167-9457(16)30021-5</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.001</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PosturoV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000701 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000701 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    PosturoV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:26949920
   |texte=   How providing more or less time to solve a cognitive task interferes with upright stance control; a posturographic analysis on healthy young adults.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:26949920" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PosturoV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Fri Nov 13 22:38:36 2020. Site generation: Thu Mar 25 16:16:50 2021