Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center
Identifieur interne : 000222 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000221; suivant : 000223Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center
Auteurs : Kathleen A. Crowley ; Ronnie Myers ; Lori A. Magda ; Stephen S. Morse ; Paul Brandt-Rauf ; Robyn R. M. GershonSource :
- American journal of infection control [ 0196-6553 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Background: Information on the rates and factors associated with influenza vaccinations, although limited, is important because it can inform the development of effective vaccination campaigns in a university medical center setting. Methods: A study was conducted in 2011 to identify individual and organizational level barriers and facilitators to influenza vaccination among clinical and nonclinical personnel (N = 428) from a major university medical center. Results: Seventy-one percent of clinical personnel (n = 170) reported pandemic H1N1 vaccination compared with 27% of nonclinical personnel (n = 258), even though vaccine was made widely available to all personnel at no cost. Similarly, disparate rates between clinical and nonclinical personnel were noted for the 2009/2010 seasonal influenza vaccine (82% vs 42%, respectively) and 2010/2011 combination (pandemic plus seasonal) influenza vaccine (73% vs 28%, respectively). Factors associated with pandemic vaccination in nonclinical personnel included the following: high level of influenza-related knowledge, concern regarding influenza contagion, history of previous influenza vaccinations or influenza illness, participation in vaccine-related training, and awareness of the institution's written pandemic plan. For clinicians, past history of seasonal influenza vaccination was associated with pandemic vaccination. For all participants, taking any 1 or more of the 3 influenza vaccines available in 2009 to 2011 was associated with intent to take a hypothetical future novel pandemic vaccine (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.32-10.44; P < .001). Conclusion: Most of the risk factors associated with lack of vaccination uptake are amenable to organizational strategies.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 13-0309651 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center |
AU : | CROWLEY (Kathleen A.); MYERS (Ronnie); MAGDA (Lori A.); MORSE (Stephen S.); BRANDT-RAUF (Paul); GERSHON (Robyn R. M.) |
AF : | Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health/New York, NY/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University/New York, NY/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University/Teaneck, NJ/Etats-Unis (3 aut.); Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health/New York, NY/Etats-Unis (4 aut.); School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, IL/Etats-Unis (5 aut.); Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University California San Francisco/San Francisco, CA/Etats-Unis (6 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | American journal of infection control; ISSN 0196-6553; Etats-Unis; Da. 2013; Vol. 41; No. 9; Pp. 824-830; Bibl. 23 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Background: Information on the rates and factors associated with influenza vaccinations, although limited, is important because it can inform the development of effective vaccination campaigns in a university medical center setting. Methods: A study was conducted in 2011 to identify individual and organizational level barriers and facilitators to influenza vaccination among clinical and nonclinical personnel (N = 428) from a major university medical center. Results: Seventy-one percent of clinical personnel (n = 170) reported pandemic H1N1 vaccination compared with 27% of nonclinical personnel (n = 258), even though vaccine was made widely available to all personnel at no cost. Similarly, disparate rates between clinical and nonclinical personnel were noted for the 2009/2010 seasonal influenza vaccine (82% vs 42%, respectively) and 2010/2011 combination (pandemic plus seasonal) influenza vaccine (73% vs 28%, respectively). Factors associated with pandemic vaccination in nonclinical personnel included the following: high level of influenza-related knowledge, concern regarding influenza contagion, history of previous influenza vaccinations or influenza illness, participation in vaccine-related training, and awareness of the institution's written pandemic plan. For clinicians, past history of seasonal influenza vaccination was associated with pandemic vaccination. For all participants, taking any 1 or more of the 3 influenza vaccines available in 2009 to 2011 was associated with intent to take a hypothetical future novel pandemic vaccine (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.32-10.44; P < .001). Conclusion: Most of the risk factors associated with lack of vaccination uptake are amenable to organizational strategies. |
CC : | 002B05A02; 002B05C02C |
FD : | Grippe A; Immunoprophylaxie; Prévalence; Vaccination; Employé; Contrôle; Pandémie |
FG : | Virose; Infection; Epidémiologie; Prévention |
ED : | Influenza A; Immunoprophylaxis; Prevalence; Vaccination; Employee; Check |
EG : | Viral disease; Infection; Epidemiology; Prevention |
SD : | Gripe A; Inmunoprofilaxia; Prevalencia; Vacunación; Empleado; Control |
LO : | INIST-19097.354000505836900140 |
ID : | 13-0309651 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:13-0309651Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center</title>
<author><name sortKey="Crowley, Kathleen A" sort="Crowley, Kathleen A" uniqKey="Crowley K" first="Kathleen A." last="Crowley">Kathleen A. Crowley</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Myers, Ronnie" sort="Myers, Ronnie" uniqKey="Myers R" first="Ronnie" last="Myers">Ronnie Myers</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Magda, Lori A" sort="Magda, Lori A" uniqKey="Magda L" first="Lori A." last="Magda">Lori A. Magda</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University</s1>
<s2>Teaneck, NJ</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Morse, Stephen S" sort="Morse, Stephen S" uniqKey="Morse S" first="Stephen S." last="Morse">Stephen S. Morse</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Brandt Rauf, Paul" sort="Brandt Rauf, Paul" uniqKey="Brandt Rauf P" first="Paul" last="Brandt-Rauf">Paul Brandt-Rauf</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, IL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gershon, Robyn R M" sort="Gershon, Robyn R M" uniqKey="Gershon R" first="Robyn R. M." last="Gershon">Robyn R. M. Gershon</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="06"><s1>Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University California San Francisco</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0309651</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0309651 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0309651</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000222</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center</title>
<author><name sortKey="Crowley, Kathleen A" sort="Crowley, Kathleen A" uniqKey="Crowley K" first="Kathleen A." last="Crowley">Kathleen A. Crowley</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Myers, Ronnie" sort="Myers, Ronnie" uniqKey="Myers R" first="Ronnie" last="Myers">Ronnie Myers</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Magda, Lori A" sort="Magda, Lori A" uniqKey="Magda L" first="Lori A." last="Magda">Lori A. Magda</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University</s1>
<s2>Teaneck, NJ</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Morse, Stephen S" sort="Morse, Stephen S" uniqKey="Morse S" first="Stephen S." last="Morse">Stephen S. Morse</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Brandt Rauf, Paul" sort="Brandt Rauf, Paul" uniqKey="Brandt Rauf P" first="Paul" last="Brandt-Rauf">Paul Brandt-Rauf</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, IL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gershon, Robyn R M" sort="Gershon, Robyn R M" uniqKey="Gershon R" first="Robyn R. M." last="Gershon">Robyn R. M. Gershon</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="06"><s1>Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University California San Francisco</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">American journal of infection control</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. infect. control</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0196-6553</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">American journal of infection control</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. infect. control</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0196-6553</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Check</term>
<term>Employee</term>
<term>Immunoprophylaxis</term>
<term>Influenza A</term>
<term>Prevalence</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Grippe A</term>
<term>Immunoprophylaxie</term>
<term>Prévalence</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
<term>Employé</term>
<term>Contrôle</term>
<term>Pandémie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Background: Information on the rates and factors associated with influenza vaccinations, although limited, is important because it can inform the development of effective vaccination campaigns in a university medical center setting. Methods: A study was conducted in 2011 to identify individual and organizational level barriers and facilitators to influenza vaccination among clinical and nonclinical personnel (N = 428) from a major university medical center. Results: Seventy-one percent of clinical personnel (n = 170) reported pandemic H1N1 vaccination compared with 27% of nonclinical personnel (n = 258), even though vaccine was made widely available to all personnel at no cost. Similarly, disparate rates between clinical and nonclinical personnel were noted for the 2009/2010 seasonal influenza vaccine (82% vs 42%, respectively) and 2010/2011 combination (pandemic plus seasonal) influenza vaccine (73% vs 28%, respectively). Factors associated with pandemic vaccination in nonclinical personnel included the following: high level of influenza-related knowledge, concern regarding influenza contagion, history of previous influenza vaccinations or influenza illness, participation in vaccine-related training, and awareness of the institution's written pandemic plan. For clinicians, past history of seasonal influenza vaccination was associated with pandemic vaccination. For all participants, taking any 1 or more of the 3 influenza vaccines available in 2009 to 2011 was associated with intent to take a hypothetical future novel pandemic vaccine (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.32-10.44; P < .001). Conclusion: Most of the risk factors associated with lack of vaccination uptake are amenable to organizational strategies.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0196-6553</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Am. j. infect. control</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>41</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>9</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>CROWLEY (Kathleen A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MYERS (Ronnie)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MAGDA (Lori A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MORSE (Stephen S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>BRANDT-RAUF (Paul)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>GERSHON (Robyn R. M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University</s1>
<s2>Teaneck, NJ</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health</s1>
<s2>New York, NY</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05"><s1>School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago</s1>
<s2>Chicago, IL</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="06"><s1>Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University California San Francisco</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>824-830</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2013</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>19097</s2>
<s5>354000505836900140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>23 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0309651</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>American journal of infection control</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Background: Information on the rates and factors associated with influenza vaccinations, although limited, is important because it can inform the development of effective vaccination campaigns in a university medical center setting. Methods: A study was conducted in 2011 to identify individual and organizational level barriers and facilitators to influenza vaccination among clinical and nonclinical personnel (N = 428) from a major university medical center. Results: Seventy-one percent of clinical personnel (n = 170) reported pandemic H1N1 vaccination compared with 27% of nonclinical personnel (n = 258), even though vaccine was made widely available to all personnel at no cost. Similarly, disparate rates between clinical and nonclinical personnel were noted for the 2009/2010 seasonal influenza vaccine (82% vs 42%, respectively) and 2010/2011 combination (pandemic plus seasonal) influenza vaccine (73% vs 28%, respectively). Factors associated with pandemic vaccination in nonclinical personnel included the following: high level of influenza-related knowledge, concern regarding influenza contagion, history of previous influenza vaccinations or influenza illness, participation in vaccine-related training, and awareness of the institution's written pandemic plan. For clinicians, past history of seasonal influenza vaccination was associated with pandemic vaccination. For all participants, taking any 1 or more of the 3 influenza vaccines available in 2009 to 2011 was associated with intent to take a hypothetical future novel pandemic vaccine (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.32-10.44; P < .001). Conclusion: Most of the risk factors associated with lack of vaccination uptake are amenable to organizational strategies.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B05A02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B05C02C</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Grippe A</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Influenza A</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Gripe A</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Immunoprophylaxie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Immunoprophylaxis</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Inmunoprofilaxia</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prévalence</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prevalence</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prevalencia</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vaccination</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vaccination</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vacunación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Employé</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Employee</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Empleado</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Contrôle</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Check</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Control</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pandémie</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Virose</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Viral disease</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Virosis</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Infection</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Infección</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Epidémiologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Epidemiology</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Epidemiología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Prévention</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prevention</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prevención</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>294</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 13-0309651 INIST</NO>
<ET>Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center</ET>
<AU>CROWLEY (Kathleen A.); MYERS (Ronnie); MAGDA (Lori A.); MORSE (Stephen S.); BRANDT-RAUF (Paul); GERSHON (Robyn R. M.)</AU>
<AF>Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health/New York, NY/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University/New York, NY/Etats-Unis (2 aut.); School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University/Teaneck, NJ/Etats-Unis (3 aut.); Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health/New York, NY/Etats-Unis (4 aut.); School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago/Chicago, IL/Etats-Unis (5 aut.); Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University California San Francisco/San Francisco, CA/Etats-Unis (6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>American journal of infection control; ISSN 0196-6553; Etats-Unis; Da. 2013; Vol. 41; No. 9; Pp. 824-830; Bibl. 23 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Background: Information on the rates and factors associated with influenza vaccinations, although limited, is important because it can inform the development of effective vaccination campaigns in a university medical center setting. Methods: A study was conducted in 2011 to identify individual and organizational level barriers and facilitators to influenza vaccination among clinical and nonclinical personnel (N = 428) from a major university medical center. Results: Seventy-one percent of clinical personnel (n = 170) reported pandemic H1N1 vaccination compared with 27% of nonclinical personnel (n = 258), even though vaccine was made widely available to all personnel at no cost. Similarly, disparate rates between clinical and nonclinical personnel were noted for the 2009/2010 seasonal influenza vaccine (82% vs 42%, respectively) and 2010/2011 combination (pandemic plus seasonal) influenza vaccine (73% vs 28%, respectively). Factors associated with pandemic vaccination in nonclinical personnel included the following: high level of influenza-related knowledge, concern regarding influenza contagion, history of previous influenza vaccinations or influenza illness, participation in vaccine-related training, and awareness of the institution's written pandemic plan. For clinicians, past history of seasonal influenza vaccination was associated with pandemic vaccination. For all participants, taking any 1 or more of the 3 influenza vaccines available in 2009 to 2011 was associated with intent to take a hypothetical future novel pandemic vaccine (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval: 4.32-10.44; P < .001). Conclusion: Most of the risk factors associated with lack of vaccination uptake are amenable to organizational strategies.</EA>
<CC>002B05A02; 002B05C02C</CC>
<FD>Grippe A; Immunoprophylaxie; Prévalence; Vaccination; Employé; Contrôle; Pandémie</FD>
<FG>Virose; Infection; Epidémiologie; Prévention</FG>
<ED>Influenza A; Immunoprophylaxis; Prevalence; Vaccination; Employee; Check</ED>
<EG>Viral disease; Infection; Epidemiology; Prevention</EG>
<SD>Gripe A; Inmunoprofilaxia; Prevalencia; Vacunación; Empleado; Control</SD>
<LO>INIST-19097.354000505836900140</LO>
<ID>13-0309651</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/PandemieGrippaleV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000222 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000222 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Sante |area= PandemieGrippaleV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:13-0309651 |texte= Prevalence and factors associated with 2009 to 2011 influenza vaccinations at a university medical center }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.34. |