Divining and Knowing:
Identifieur interne : 000133 ( Pmc/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000132; suivant : 000134Divining and Knowing:
Auteurs : Claudia SteinSource :
- Bulletin of the History of Medicine [ 0007-5140 ] ; 2013.
Abstract
This article investigates the historical method of Karl Sudhoff (1853– 1938), Germany’s first professor of medical history. It argues that in order to understand his ideas more fully, we need to step outside the historiography of medical history and assess his methodology in relation to the norms and ideals of German academic history writing in general. The article demonstrates that the philology-based “critical method” of Leopold von Ranke (1795–1886) was central to Sudhoff’s methodological thinking. It investigates the underlying philosophical and epistemological assumptions of Ranke’s method, which tend to be less appreciated than his overt empiricism and explores how Sudhoff applied these to the new professionalizing subdiscipline of the history of medicine. The article argues that Sudhoff’s concerns with the methodology of history, which involved a particular conception of the relationship between the human sciences and the medical sciences, offers compelling addresses to our times.
Url:
PubMed: 23811710
PubMed Central: 3752974
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
PMC:3752974Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Divining and Knowing: </title><author><name sortKey="Stein, Claudia" sort="Stein, Claudia" uniqKey="Stein C" first="Claudia" last="Stein">Claudia Stein</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">23811710</idno><idno type="pmc">3752974</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3752974</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3752974</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000285</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000285</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000285</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000285</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000133</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000133</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Divining and Knowing: </title><author><name sortKey="Stein, Claudia" sort="Stein, Claudia" uniqKey="Stein C" first="Claudia" last="Stein">Claudia Stein</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Bulletin of the History of Medicine</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-5140</idno><idno type="eISSN">1086-3176</idno><imprint><date when="2013">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><title>Summary</title><p>This article investigates the historical method of Karl Sudhoff (1853– 1938), Germany’s first professor of medical history. It argues that in order to understand his ideas more fully, we need to step outside the historiography of medical history and assess his methodology in relation to the norms and ideals of German academic history writing in general. The article demonstrates that the philology-based “critical method” of Leopold von Ranke (1795–1886) was central to Sudhoff’s methodological thinking. It investigates the underlying philosophical and epistemological assumptions of Ranke’s method, which tend to be less appreciated than his overt empiricism and explores how Sudhoff applied these to the new professionalizing subdiscipline of the history of medicine. The article argues that Sudhoff’s concerns with the methodology of history, which involved a particular conception of the relationship between the human sciences and the medical sciences, offers compelling addresses to our times.
</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Bull Hist Med</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Bull Hist Med</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Bulletin of the History of Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0007-5140</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1086-3176</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23811710</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3752974</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">bhm_510883</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Divining and Knowing: </article-title><subtitle>Karl Sudhoff’s Historical Method</subtitle></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Stein</surname><given-names>Claudia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="bio" rid="bio01">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><season>Summer
</season><year>2013</year></pub-date><fpage>198</fpage><lpage>224</lpage><page-range>198-224</page-range><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2013 The Johns Hopkins University Press</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><copyright-holder>The Johns Hopkins University Press
</copyright-holder></permissions><abstract><title>Summary</title><p>This article investigates the historical method of Karl Sudhoff (1853– 1938), Germany’s first professor of medical history. It argues that in order to understand his ideas more fully, we need to step outside the historiography of medical history and assess his methodology in relation to the norms and ideals of German academic history writing in general. The article demonstrates that the philology-based “critical method” of Leopold von Ranke (1795–1886) was central to Sudhoff’s methodological thinking. It investigates the underlying philosophical and epistemological assumptions of Ranke’s method, which tend to be less appreciated than his overt empiricism and explores how Sudhoff applied these to the new professionalizing subdiscipline of the history of medicine. The article argues that Sudhoff’s concerns with the methodology of history, which involved a particular conception of the relationship between the human sciences and the medical sciences, offers compelling addresses to our times.
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Karl Sudhoff</kwd><kwd>history of medicine</kwd><kwd>Leopold von Ranke</kwd><kwd>empiricism</kwd><kwd>historism</kwd><kwd>intuition</kwd><kwd>natural vs. human sciences</kwd><kwd>affect</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Stein, Claudia" sort="Stein, Claudia" uniqKey="Stein C" first="Claudia" last="Stein">Claudia Stein</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Archeologie/explor/PaleopathV1/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000133 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000133 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Archeologie
|area= PaleopathV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:3752974
|texte= Divining and Knowing:
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23811710" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PaleopathV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27. |  |