Movement Disorders (revue)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A review of the assessment of dyskinesias.

Identifieur interne : 000116 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 000115; suivant : 000117

A review of the assessment of dyskinesias.

Auteurs : J I Hoff [Pays-Bas] ; B J Van Hilten ; R A Roos

Source :

RBID : pubmed:10495034

English descriptors

Abstract

Dyskinesias are most prevalent in patients with Huntington's disease (HD), patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have received chronic levodopa therapy, and in patients who have been treated with neuroleptics (tardive dyskinesia ITD]). Recent therapeutic developments have fueled a growing interest in the clinimetrics of dyskinesias. For dyskinesias in HD, few rating scales are available, but data on validity, reliability, and responsiveness are scarce. Only the interrater reliability of facial dyskinesias has been evaluated and found to be low. Many subjective rating scales for dyskinesias in PD exist, but only the Dyskinesia Rating Scale has undergone sufficient clinimetric evaluation. For TD, numerous rating scales are available, many of them with ample data on reliability and validity. Objective assessment of dyskinesias has been attempted with a number of techniques. All these methods require a laboratory setting, rendering them susceptible to influence of stress. Moreover, they provide only a momentary assessment of dyskinesia severity and fail to take into account diurnal fluctuations. In view of the methodologic shortcomings in the assessment of dyskinesias, more effort needs to be put into strengthening currently available modes of assessment or designing new ones. In the future ambulatory accelerometry might prove to be of value in this field.

PubMed: 10495034

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:10495034

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">A review of the assessment of dyskinesias.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hoff, J I" sort="Hoff, J I" uniqKey="Hoff J" first="J I" last="Hoff">J I Hoff</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leiden University Medical Center</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Hilten, B J" sort="Van Hilten, B J" uniqKey="Van Hilten B" first="B J" last="Van Hilten">B J Van Hilten</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Roos, R A" sort="Roos, R A" uniqKey="Roos R" first="R A" last="Roos">R A Roos</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:10495034</idno>
<idno type="pmid">10495034</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004135</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">004135</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">004282</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000116</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000116</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">A review of the assessment of dyskinesias.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hoff, J I" sort="Hoff, J I" uniqKey="Hoff J" first="J I" last="Hoff">J I Hoff</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leiden University Medical Center</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Hilten, B J" sort="Van Hilten, B J" uniqKey="Van Hilten B" first="B J" last="Van Hilten">B J Van Hilten</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Roos, R A" sort="Roos, R A" uniqKey="Roos R" first="R A" last="Roos">R A Roos</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="1999" type="published">1999</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dyskinesias (complications)</term>
<term>Dyskinesias (diagnosis)</term>
<term>Electromyography</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Huntington Disease (complications)</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="complications" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dyskinesias</term>
<term>Huntington Disease</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dyskinesias</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Electromyography</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Dyskinesias are most prevalent in patients with Huntington's disease (HD), patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have received chronic levodopa therapy, and in patients who have been treated with neuroleptics (tardive dyskinesia ITD]). Recent therapeutic developments have fueled a growing interest in the clinimetrics of dyskinesias. For dyskinesias in HD, few rating scales are available, but data on validity, reliability, and responsiveness are scarce. Only the interrater reliability of facial dyskinesias has been evaluated and found to be low. Many subjective rating scales for dyskinesias in PD exist, but only the Dyskinesia Rating Scale has undergone sufficient clinimetric evaluation. For TD, numerous rating scales are available, many of them with ample data on reliability and validity. Objective assessment of dyskinesias has been attempted with a number of techniques. All these methods require a laboratory setting, rendering them susceptible to influence of stress. Moreover, they provide only a momentary assessment of dyskinesia severity and fail to take into account diurnal fluctuations. In view of the methodologic shortcomings in the assessment of dyskinesias, more effort needs to be put into strengthening currently available modes of assessment or designing new ones. In the future ambulatory accelerometry might prove to be of value in this field.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/MovDisordV3/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000116 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000116 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    MovDisordV3
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:10495034
   |texte=   A review of the assessment of dyskinesias.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:10495034" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a MovDisordV3 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Sun Jul 3 12:29:32 2016. Site generation: Wed Feb 14 10:52:30 2024