LymphedemaV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000128

Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage

Identifieur interne : 000128 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000127; suivant : 000129

Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage

Auteurs : Katherine M. Burnand ; Daphne M. Glass ; Sumati Sundaraiya ; Peter S. Mortimer ; A. Michael Peters

Source :

American journal of roentgenology : (1976) [ 0361-803X ] ; 2011.

RBID : Pascal:12-0021255

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Lipoedème, Lymphoedème, Scintigraphie, Pied, Système lymphatique, Membre, Drainage, Ganglion lymphatique, Technétium 99mTc, Médecine nucléaire, Radiologie, Lymphoscintigraphie.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Drainage, Foot, Limb, Lipoedema, Lymph node, Lymphatic system, Lymphedema, Lymphoscintigraphy, Nuclear medicine, Radiology, Scintigraphy, Technetium 99mTc.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to examine the frequency and significance of visualization of popliteal nodes during lymphoscintigraphy for the investigation of lower extremity swelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid was injected subcutaneously in the first web spaces of both feet of 204 consecutive patients (69 males, 135 females; age range, 11-79 years) undergoing routine, clinically indicated lymphoscintigraphy ; imaging was performed 5, 45, and 150 minutes after injection. The patients were asked not to undertake any vigorous exercise between the injection and completion of imaging. RESULTS. No popliteal nodes were visualized in 29 patients in whom there was no evidence of lymphedema on clinical or lymphoscintigraphic examination (group 1). Unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 10 of 39 patients (25.6%) with clinical evidence of lymphedema but normal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 2) (p < 0.005 vs group 1). In 136 patients with clinical evidence of lymphedema and abnormal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 3), unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 59 (43.4%) (p < 0.0001 vs group 1). Popliteal nodes were visualized in 40 of 73 limbs with "dermal backflow" (54.8%) and 42 of 335 limbs without dermal backflow (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Popliteal node visualization after subcutaneous foot web space injection is an important sign of abnormal lymphatic function in patients with clinical lymphedema of the lower extremities.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0361-803X`
A02	`01`			`@0 AAJRDX`
A03		`1`		`@0 Am. j. roentgenol. : (1976)`
A05				`@2 197`
A06				`@2 6`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 BURNAND (Katherine M.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 GLASS (Daphne M.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 SUNDARAIYA (Sumati)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 MORTIMER (Peter S.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 MICHAEL PETERS (A.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd @2 Brighton BN2 5BE @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic @2 London @3 GBR @Z 2 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Department of Medicine, St. George's Hospital @2 London @3 GBR @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@1 1443-1448`
A21				`@1 2011`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 5093 @5 354000507346810200`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 21 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 12-0021255`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 American journal of roentgenology : (1976)`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to examine the frequency and significance of visualization of popliteal nodes during lymphoscintigraphy for the investigation of lower extremity swelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid was injected subcutaneously in the first web spaces of both feet of 204 consecutive patients (69 males, 135 females; age range, 11-79 years) undergoing routine, clinically indicated lymphoscintigraphy ; imaging was performed 5, 45, and 150 minutes after injection. The patients were asked not to undertake any vigorous exercise between the injection and completion of imaging. RESULTS. No popliteal nodes were visualized in 29 patients in whom there was no evidence of lymphedema on clinical or lymphoscintigraphic examination (group 1). Unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 10 of 39 patients (25.6%) with clinical evidence of lymphedema but normal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 2) (p < 0.005 vs group 1). In 136 patients with clinical evidence of lymphedema and abnormal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 3), unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 59 (43.4%) (p < 0.0001 vs group 1). Popliteal nodes were visualized in 40 of 73 limbs with "dermal backflow" (54.8%) and 42 of 335 limbs without dermal backflow (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Popliteal node visualization after subcutaneous foot web space injection is an important sign of abnormal lymphatic function in patients with clinical lymphedema of the lower extremities.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B24`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B08J`
C02	`03`	`X`		`@0 002B12B04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lipoedème @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lipoedema @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lipoedema @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lymphoedème @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lymphedema @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Linfedema @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Scintigraphie @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Scintigraphy @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Centelleografía @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pied @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Foot @5 07`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Pie @5 07`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Système lymphatique @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lymphatic system @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sistema linfático @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Membre @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Limb @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Miembro @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Drainage @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Drainage @5 13`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Drenaje @5 13`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ganglion lymphatique @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lymph node @5 14`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ganglio linfático @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Technétium 99mTc @2 NK @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Technetium 99mTc @2 NK @5 15`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tecnecio 99mTc @2 NK @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Médecine nucléaire @5 16`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Nuclear medicine @5 16`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Medicina nuclear @5 16`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Radiologie @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Radiology @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Radiología @5 17`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lymphoscintigraphie @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lymphoscintigraphy @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Linfocentelleografía @4 CD @5 96`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Exploration radioisotopique @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Radionuclide study @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Exploración radioisotópica @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Imagerie médicale @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Medical imagery @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Imaginería médica @5 38`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie de la peau @5 39`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Skin disease @5 39`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Piel patología @5 39`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie du tissu adipeux @5 40`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Adipose tissue disorders @5 40`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tejido adiposo patología @5 40`
C07	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie de l'appareil circulatoire @5 41`
C07	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cardiovascular disease @5 41`
C07	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aparato circulatorio patología @5 41`
C07	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques @5 42`
C07	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lymphatic vessel disease @5 42`
C07	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Linfático patología @5 42`
N21				`@1 009`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 12-0021255 INIST
ET :	Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage
AU :	BURNAND (Katherine M.); GLASS (Daphne M.); SUNDARAIYA (Sumati); MORTIMER (Peter S.); MICHAEL PETERS (A.)
AF :	Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd/Brighton BN2 5BE/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 3 aut., 5 aut.); Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic/London/Royaume-Uni (2 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Medicine, St. George's Hospital/London/Royaume-Uni (4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	American journal of roentgenology : (1976); ISSN 0361-803X; Coden AAJRDX; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 197; No. 6; Pp. 1443-1448; Bibl. 21 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to examine the frequency and significance of visualization of popliteal nodes during lymphoscintigraphy for the investigation of lower extremity swelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid was injected subcutaneously in the first web spaces of both feet of 204 consecutive patients (69 males, 135 females; age range, 11-79 years) undergoing routine, clinically indicated lymphoscintigraphy ; imaging was performed 5, 45, and 150 minutes after injection. The patients were asked not to undertake any vigorous exercise between the injection and completion of imaging. RESULTS. No popliteal nodes were visualized in 29 patients in whom there was no evidence of lymphedema on clinical or lymphoscintigraphic examination (group 1). Unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 10 of 39 patients (25.6%) with clinical evidence of lymphedema but normal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 2) (p < 0.005 vs group 1). In 136 patients with clinical evidence of lymphedema and abnormal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 3), unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 59 (43.4%) (p < 0.0001 vs group 1). Popliteal nodes were visualized in 40 of 73 limbs with "dermal backflow" (54.8%) and 42 of 335 limbs without dermal backflow (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Popliteal node visualization after subcutaneous foot web space injection is an important sign of abnormal lymphatic function in patients with clinical lymphedema of the lower extremities.
CC :	002B24; 002B08J; 002B12B04
FD :	Lipoedème; Lymphoedème; Scintigraphie; Pied; Système lymphatique; Membre; Drainage; Ganglion lymphatique; Technétium 99mTc; Médecine nucléaire; Radiologie; Lymphoscintigraphie
FG :	Exploration radioisotopique; Imagerie médicale; Pathologie de la peau; Pathologie du tissu adipeux; Pathologie de l'appareil circulatoire; Pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques
ED :	Lipoedema; Lymphedema; Scintigraphy; Foot; Lymphatic system; Limb; Drainage; Lymph node; Technetium 99mTc; Nuclear medicine; Radiology; Lymphoscintigraphy
EG :	Radionuclide study; Medical imagery; Skin disease; Adipose tissue disorders; Cardiovascular disease; Lymphatic vessel disease
SD :	Lipoedema; Linfedema; Centelleografía; Pie; Sistema linfático; Miembro; Drenaje; Ganglio linfático; Tecnecio 99mTc; Medicina nuclear; Radiología; Linfocentelleografía
LO :	INIST-5093.354000507346810200
ID :	12-0021255

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:12-0021255

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage</title>
<author><name sortKey="Burnand, Katherine M" sort="Burnand, Katherine M" uniqKey="Burnand K" first="Katherine M." last="Burnand">Katherine M. Burnand</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd</s1>
<s2>Brighton BN2 5BE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Glass, Daphne M" sort="Glass, Daphne M" uniqKey="Glass D" first="Daphne M." last="Glass">Daphne M. Glass</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sundaraiya, Sumati" sort="Sundaraiya, Sumati" uniqKey="Sundaraiya S" first="Sumati" last="Sundaraiya">Sumati Sundaraiya</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd</s1>
<s2>Brighton BN2 5BE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mortimer, Peter S" sort="Mortimer, Peter S" uniqKey="Mortimer P" first="Peter S." last="Mortimer">Peter S. Mortimer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Medicine, St. George's Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Michael Peters, A" sort="Michael Peters, A" uniqKey="Michael Peters A" first="A." last="Michael Peters">A. Michael Peters</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd</s1>
<s2>Brighton BN2 5BE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0021255</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0021255 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0021255</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000128</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage</title>
<author><name sortKey="Burnand, Katherine M" sort="Burnand, Katherine M" uniqKey="Burnand K" first="Katherine M." last="Burnand">Katherine M. Burnand</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd</s1>
<s2>Brighton BN2 5BE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Glass, Daphne M" sort="Glass, Daphne M" uniqKey="Glass D" first="Daphne M." last="Glass">Daphne M. Glass</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sundaraiya, Sumati" sort="Sundaraiya, Sumati" uniqKey="Sundaraiya S" first="Sumati" last="Sundaraiya">Sumati Sundaraiya</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd</s1>
<s2>Brighton BN2 5BE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mortimer, Peter S" sort="Mortimer, Peter S" uniqKey="Mortimer P" first="Peter S." last="Mortimer">Peter S. Mortimer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Medicine, St. George's Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Michael Peters, A" sort="Michael Peters, A" uniqKey="Michael Peters A" first="A." last="Michael Peters">A. Michael Peters</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd</s1>
<s2>Brighton BN2 5BE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">American journal of roentgenology : (1976)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. roentgenol. : (1976)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0361-803X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">American journal of roentgenology : (1976)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. roentgenol. : (1976)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0361-803X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Drainage</term>
<term>Foot</term>
<term>Limb</term>
<term>Lipoedema</term>
<term>Lymph node</term>
<term>Lymphatic system</term>
<term>Lymphedema</term>
<term>Lymphoscintigraphy</term>
<term>Nuclear medicine</term>
<term>Radiology</term>
<term>Scintigraphy</term>
<term>Technetium 99mTc</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Lipoedème</term>
<term>Lymphoedème</term>
<term>Scintigraphie</term>
<term>Pied</term>
<term>Système lymphatique</term>
<term>Membre</term>
<term>Drainage</term>
<term>Ganglion lymphatique</term>
<term>Technétium 99mTc</term>
<term>Médecine nucléaire</term>
<term>Radiologie</term>
<term>Lymphoscintigraphie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to examine the frequency and significance of visualization of popliteal nodes during lymphoscintigraphy for the investigation of lower extremity swelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid was injected subcutaneously in the first web spaces of both feet of 204 consecutive patients (69 males, 135 females; age range, 11-79 years) undergoing routine, clinically indicated lymphoscintigraphy ; imaging was performed 5, 45, and 150 minutes after injection. The patients were asked not to undertake any vigorous exercise between the injection and completion of imaging. RESULTS. No popliteal nodes were visualized in 29 patients in whom there was no evidence of lymphedema on clinical or lymphoscintigraphic examination (group 1). Unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 10 of 39 patients (25.6%) with clinical evidence of lymphedema but normal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 2) (p < 0.005 vs group 1). In 136 patients with clinical evidence of lymphedema and abnormal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 3), unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 59 (43.4%) (p < 0.0001 vs group 1). Popliteal nodes were visualized in 40 of 73 limbs with "dermal backflow" (54.8%) and 42 of 335 limbs without dermal backflow (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Popliteal node visualization after subcutaneous foot web space injection is an important sign of abnormal lymphatic function in patients with clinical lymphedema of the lower extremities.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0361-803X</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>AAJRDX</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Am. j. roentgenol. : (1976)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>197</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>6</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BURNAND (Katherine M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>GLASS (Daphne M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>SUNDARAIYA (Sumati)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MORTIMER (Peter S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>MICHAEL PETERS (A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd</s1>
<s2>Brighton BN2 5BE</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Medicine, St. George's Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1443-1448</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>5093</s2>
<s5>354000507346810200</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>21 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0021255</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>American journal of roentgenology : (1976)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to examine the frequency and significance of visualization of popliteal nodes during lymphoscintigraphy for the investigation of lower extremity swelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid was injected subcutaneously in the first web spaces of both feet of 204 consecutive patients (69 males, 135 females; age range, 11-79 years) undergoing routine, clinically indicated lymphoscintigraphy ; imaging was performed 5, 45, and 150 minutes after injection. The patients were asked not to undertake any vigorous exercise between the injection and completion of imaging. RESULTS. No popliteal nodes were visualized in 29 patients in whom there was no evidence of lymphedema on clinical or lymphoscintigraphic examination (group 1). Unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 10 of 39 patients (25.6%) with clinical evidence of lymphedema but normal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 2) (p < 0.005 vs group 1). In 136 patients with clinical evidence of lymphedema and abnormal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 3), unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 59 (43.4%) (p < 0.0001 vs group 1). Popliteal nodes were visualized in 40 of 73 limbs with "dermal backflow" (54.8%) and 42 of 335 limbs without dermal backflow (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Popliteal node visualization after subcutaneous foot web space injection is an important sign of abnormal lymphatic function in patients with clinical lymphedema of the lower extremities.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B24</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B08J</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002B12B04</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lipoedème</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lipoedema</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lipoedema</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lymphoedème</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lymphedema</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Linfedema</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Scintigraphie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Scintigraphy</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Centelleografía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pied</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Foot</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pie</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système lymphatique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lymphatic system</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema linfático</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Membre</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Limb</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Miembro</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Drainage</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Drainage</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Drenaje</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ganglion lymphatique</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lymph node</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ganglio linfático</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Technétium 99mTc</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Technetium 99mTc</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tecnecio 99mTc</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Médecine nucléaire</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nuclear medicine</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Medicina nuclear</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Radiologie</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radiology</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Radiología</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lymphoscintigraphie</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lymphoscintigraphy</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Linfocentelleografía</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Exploration radioisotopique</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Radionuclide study</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Exploración radioisotópica</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Imagerie médicale</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Medical imagery</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Imaginería médica</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie de la peau</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Skin disease</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Piel patología</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie du  tissu adipeux</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Adipose tissue disorders</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tejido adiposo patología</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie de l'appareil circulatoire</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cardiovascular disease</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aparato circulatorio patología</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques</s0>
<s5>42</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lymphatic vessel disease</s0>
<s5>42</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Linfático patología</s0>
<s5>42</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>009</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 12-0021255 INIST</NO>
<ET>Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage</ET>
<AU>BURNAND (Katherine M.); GLASS (Daphne M.); SUNDARAIYA (Sumati); MORTIMER (Peter S.); MICHAEL PETERS (A.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, Sussex Medical School, Audrey Emerton Bldg, Eastern Rd/Brighton BN2 5BE/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 3 aut., 5 aut.); Departmentof Nuclear Medicine, Harley Street Clinic/London/Royaume-Uni (2 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Medicine, St. George's Hospital/London/Royaume-Uni (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>American journal of roentgenology : (1976); ISSN 0361-803X; Coden AAJRDX; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 197; No. 6; Pp. 1443-1448; Bibl. 21 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to examine the frequency and significance of visualization of popliteal nodes during lymphoscintigraphy for the investigation of lower extremity swelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid was injected subcutaneously in the first web spaces of both feet of 204 consecutive patients (69 males, 135 females; age range, 11-79 years) undergoing routine, clinically indicated lymphoscintigraphy ; imaging was performed 5, 45, and 150 minutes after injection. The patients were asked not to undertake any vigorous exercise between the injection and completion of imaging. RESULTS. No popliteal nodes were visualized in 29 patients in whom there was no evidence of lymphedema on clinical or lymphoscintigraphic examination (group 1). Unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 10 of 39 patients (25.6%) with clinical evidence of lymphedema but normal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 2) (p < 0.005 vs group 1). In 136 patients with clinical evidence of lymphedema and abnormal lymphoscintigraphy findings (group 3), unilateral or bilateral popliteal nodes were visualized in 59 (43.4%) (p < 0.0001 vs group 1). Popliteal nodes were visualized in 40 of 73 limbs with "dermal backflow" (54.8%) and 42 of 335 limbs without dermal backflow (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Popliteal node visualization after subcutaneous foot web space injection is an important sign of abnormal lymphatic function in patients with clinical lymphedema of the lower extremities.</EA>
<CC>002B24; 002B08J; 002B12B04</CC>
<FD>Lipoedème; Lymphoedème; Scintigraphie; Pied; Système lymphatique; Membre; Drainage; Ganglion lymphatique; Technétium 99mTc; Médecine nucléaire; Radiologie; Lymphoscintigraphie</FD>
<FG>Exploration radioisotopique; Imagerie médicale; Pathologie de la peau; Pathologie du  tissu adipeux; Pathologie de l'appareil circulatoire; Pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques</FG>
<ED>Lipoedema; Lymphedema; Scintigraphy; Foot; Lymphatic system; Limb; Drainage; Lymph node; Technetium 99mTc; Nuclear medicine; Radiology; Lymphoscintigraphy</ED>
<EG>Radionuclide study; Medical imagery; Skin disease; Adipose tissue disorders; Cardiovascular disease; Lymphatic vessel disease</EG>
<SD>Lipoedema; Linfedema; Centelleografía; Pie; Sistema linfático; Miembro; Drenaje; Ganglio linfático; Tecnecio 99mTc; Medicina nuclear; Radiología; Linfocentelleografía</SD>
<LO>INIST-5093.354000507346810200</LO>
<ID>12-0021255</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000128 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000128 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    LymphedemaV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:12-0021255
   |texte=   Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Sat Nov 4 17:40:35 2017. Site generation: Tue Feb 13 16:42:16 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le lymphœdème

Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage

Popliteal Node Visualization During Standard Pedal Lymphoscintigraphy for a Swollen Limb Indicates Impaired Lymph Drainage

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri