A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants.
Identifieur interne : 004651 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 004650; suivant : 004652A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants.
Auteurs : H J Meijer ; F J Starmans ; F. Bosman ; W H SteenSource :
- Journal of oral rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 1993.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Stress Analysis.
- physiopathology : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Bite Force, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Anatomic.
Abstract
The stress distribution in an edentulous mandible provided with two implants in the interforaminal region was calculated by means of three different finite element models. The implants were connected with a bar or remained solitary. The first model was a three-dimensional representation of the entire mandible, the second model of the interforaminal region of this same mandible, whilst the third model was a two-dimensional representation of the interforaminal region. The differences in stress distribution around the connected implants and the solitary implants between these three models were analysed. It can be concluded that for a parameter study the stress distribution around the dental implants following from a three-dimensional finite element model of only the interforaminal region of an edentulous mandible can be used. For such studies therefore, benefit can be gained from the advantages of reduced modelling and calculation time.
PubMed: 8468626
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:8468626Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Starmans, F J" sort="Starmans, F J" uniqKey="Starmans F" first="F J" last="Starmans">F J Starmans</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bosman, F" sort="Bosman, F" uniqKey="Bosman F" first="F" last="Bosman">F. Bosman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Steen, W H" sort="Steen, W H" uniqKey="Steen W" first="W H" last="Steen">W H Steen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1993">1993</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8468626</idno><idno type="pmid">8468626</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004651</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004651</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Starmans, F J" sort="Starmans, F J" uniqKey="Starmans F" first="F J" last="Starmans">F J Starmans</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bosman, F" sort="Bosman, F" uniqKey="Bosman F" first="F" last="Bosman">F. Bosman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Steen, W H" sort="Steen, W H" uniqKey="Steen W" first="W H" last="Steen">W H Steen</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><imprint><date when="1993" type="published">1993</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bite Force</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Stress Analysis (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (physiopathology)</term><term>Mandible (physiopathology)</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Stress Analysis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Bite Force</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Humans</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The stress distribution in an edentulous mandible provided with two implants in the interforaminal region was calculated by means of three different finite element models. The implants were connected with a bar or remained solitary. The first model was a three-dimensional representation of the entire mandible, the second model of the interforaminal region of this same mandible, whilst the third model was a two-dimensional representation of the interforaminal region. The differences in stress distribution around the connected implants and the solitary implants between these three models were analysed. It can be concluded that for a parameter study the stress distribution around the dental implants following from a three-dimensional finite element model of only the interforaminal region of an edentulous mandible can be used. For such studies therefore, benefit can be gained from the advantages of reduced modelling and calculation time.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">8468626</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1993</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0305-182X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>20</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>1993</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>147-57</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The stress distribution in an edentulous mandible provided with two implants in the interforaminal region was calculated by means of three different finite element models. The implants were connected with a bar or remained solitary. The first model was a three-dimensional representation of the entire mandible, the second model of the interforaminal region of this same mandible, whilst the third model was a two-dimensional representation of the interforaminal region. The differences in stress distribution around the connected implants and the solitary implants between these three models were analysed. It can be concluded that for a parameter study the stress distribution around the dental implants following from a three-dimensional finite element model of only the interforaminal region of an edentulous mandible can be used. For such studies therefore, benefit can be gained from the advantages of reduced modelling and calculation time.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Meijer</LastName><ForeName>H J</ForeName><Initials>HJ</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Starmans</LastName><ForeName>F J</ForeName><Initials>FJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bosman</LastName><ForeName>F</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Steen</LastName><ForeName>W H</ForeName><Initials>WH</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Rehabil</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0433604</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0305-182X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001732" MajorTopicYN="N">Bite Force</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003198" MajorTopicYN="Y">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003799" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Stress Analysis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008953" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Anatomic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1993</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1993</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1993</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8468626</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004651 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004651 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8468626
|texte= A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8468626" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |