Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom.
Identifieur interne : 004035 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 004034; suivant : 004036Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom.
Auteurs : P F Allen ; D F Witter ; N H Wilson ; A F KayserSource :
- Journal of oral rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 1996.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Consultants, Crowns, Dental Arch (pathology), Dental Restoration, Permanent, Dentistry, Operative, Denture, Partial, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Male, Mouth (physiology), Oral Health, Patient Care Planning, Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Diseases (etiology), Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom.
- MESH :
- etiology : Periodontal Diseases.
- pathology : Dental Arch.
- physiology : Mouth.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Consultants, Crowns, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Dentistry, Operative, Denture, Partial, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Humans, Male, Oral Health, Patient Care Planning, Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom.
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a study on the attitudes of the consultants in restorative dentistry (CRD) in the UK towards shortened dental arch therapy (SDAT). Data were collected by means of questionnaire, with a response of 67% achieved. The results indicate that 95% (n = 87) of the 91 participants in the study were of the opinion that SDA has a place in contemporary clinical practice. Eighty (88%) of the participants reported having prescribed SDA therapy during the last 5 years, the number of these patients requiring > 5 units of crown and bridgework being typically less than 25%. Forty-one (45%) of the participants reported patients being considered for SDAT expressing reservations about the outcome of their treatment, although around 75 (82%) of the participants indicated that SDAT was satisfactory in terms of oral function, comfort and well being. Experience of having to extend shortened dental arches following SDAT was limited to 34 (37%) of the participants. It is concluded that SDA is widely accepted but not widely practiced by CRDs in the UK and that, in patients satisfying existing criteria, the outcome of SDAT may be found to be acceptable in approximately 82% of cases.
PubMed: 8814564
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:8814564Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom.</title><author><name sortKey="Allen, P F" sort="Allen, P F" uniqKey="Allen P" first="P F" last="Allen">P F Allen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Manchester, U.K.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Witter, D F" sort="Witter, D F" uniqKey="Witter D" first="D F" last="Witter">D F Witter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wilson, N H" sort="Wilson, N H" uniqKey="Wilson N" first="N H" last="Wilson">N H Wilson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kayser, A F" sort="Kayser, A F" uniqKey="Kayser A" first="A F" last="Kayser">A F Kayser</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1996">1996</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8814564</idno><idno type="pmid">8814564</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004035</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004035</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom.</title><author><name sortKey="Allen, P F" sort="Allen, P F" uniqKey="Allen P" first="P F" last="Allen">P F Allen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Manchester, U.K.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Witter, D F" sort="Witter, D F" uniqKey="Witter D" first="D F" last="Witter">D F Witter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wilson, N H" sort="Wilson, N H" uniqKey="Wilson N" first="N H" last="Wilson">N H Wilson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kayser, A F" sort="Kayser, A F" uniqKey="Kayser A" first="A F" last="Kayser">A F Kayser</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><imprint><date when="1996" type="published">1996</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Consultants</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Arch (pathology)</term><term>Dental Restoration, Permanent</term><term>Dentistry, Operative</term><term>Denture, Partial</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mouth (physiology)</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Periodontal Diseases (etiology)</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>United Kingdom</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Periodontal Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Arch</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Consultants</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Restoration, Permanent</term><term>Dentistry, Operative</term><term>Denture, Partial</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>United Kingdom</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper reports the results of a study on the attitudes of the consultants in restorative dentistry (CRD) in the UK towards shortened dental arch therapy (SDAT). Data were collected by means of questionnaire, with a response of 67% achieved. The results indicate that 95% (n = 87) of the 91 participants in the study were of the opinion that SDA has a place in contemporary clinical practice. Eighty (88%) of the participants reported having prescribed SDA therapy during the last 5 years, the number of these patients requiring > 5 units of crown and bridgework being typically less than 25%. Forty-one (45%) of the participants reported patients being considered for SDAT expressing reservations about the outcome of their treatment, although around 75 (82%) of the participants indicated that SDAT was satisfactory in terms of oral function, comfort and well being. Experience of having to extend shortened dental arches following SDAT was limited to 34 (37%) of the participants. It is concluded that SDA is widely accepted but not widely practiced by CRDs in the UK and that, in patients satisfying existing criteria, the outcome of SDAT may be found to be acceptable in approximately 82% of cases.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">8814564</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1996</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>03</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0305-182X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>23</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>1996</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>481-5</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>This paper reports the results of a study on the attitudes of the consultants in restorative dentistry (CRD) in the UK towards shortened dental arch therapy (SDAT). Data were collected by means of questionnaire, with a response of 67% achieved. The results indicate that 95% (n = 87) of the 91 participants in the study were of the opinion that SDA has a place in contemporary clinical practice. Eighty (88%) of the participants reported having prescribed SDA therapy during the last 5 years, the number of these patients requiring > 5 units of crown and bridgework being typically less than 25%. Forty-one (45%) of the participants reported patients being considered for SDAT expressing reservations about the outcome of their treatment, although around 75 (82%) of the participants indicated that SDAT was satisfactory in terms of oral function, comfort and well being. Experience of having to extend shortened dental arches following SDAT was limited to 34 (37%) of the participants. It is concluded that SDA is widely accepted but not widely practiced by CRDs in the UK and that, in patients satisfying existing criteria, the outcome of SDAT may be found to be acceptable in approximately 82% of cases.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Allen</LastName><ForeName>P F</ForeName><Initials>PF</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Manchester, U.K.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Witter</LastName><ForeName>D F</ForeName><Initials>DF</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wilson</LastName><ForeName>N H</ForeName><Initials>NH</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kayser</LastName><ForeName>A F</ForeName><Initials>AF</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Rehabil</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0433604</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0305-182X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001291" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attitude of Health Personnel</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003253" MajorTopicYN="Y">Consultants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003442" MajorTopicYN="N">Crowns</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003724" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Arch</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003793" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Restoration, Permanent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003814" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentistry, Operative</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003829" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004955" MajorTopicYN="N">Esthetics, Dental</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009055" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009909" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010510" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Diseases</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006113" MajorTopicYN="N">United Kingdom</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1996</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1996</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1996</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8814564</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004035 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004035 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8814564
|texte= Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8814564" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |