Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.
Identifieur interne : 001F65 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001F64; suivant : 001F66Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.
Auteurs : Pietro Felice ; Claudio Marchetti ; Adriano Piattelli ; Gerardo Pellegrino ; Vittorio Checchi ; Helen Worthington ; Marco EspositoSource :
- European journal of oral implantology [ 1756-2406 ] ; 2008.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Absorbable Implants, Adult, Aged, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods), Animals, Bone Regeneration (physiology), Bone Substitutes (therapeutic use), Bone Transplantation (methods), Cattle, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Survival, Humans, Ilium (surgery), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Mandible (innervation), Mandible (surgery), Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Minerals (therapeutic use), Patient Preference, Pilot Projects, Postoperative Complications, Sensation (physiology), Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical , therapeutic use : Bone Substitutes, Minerals.
- innervation : Mandible.
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Transplantation.
- physiology : Bone Regeneration, Sensation.
- surgery : Ilium, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible.
- Absorbable Implants, Adult, Aged, Animals, Cattle, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Survival, Humans, Male, Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Patient Preference, Pilot Projects, Postoperative Complications, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy, complications and patient preference of two different techniques for vertical bone augmentation of the posterior mandible: bone blocks harvested from the iliac crest versus anorganic bovine bone blocks (Bio-Oss(R)) were used as inlays.
PubMed: 20467621
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20467621Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marchetti, Claudio" sort="Marchetti, Claudio" uniqKey="Marchetti C" first="Claudio" last="Marchetti">Claudio Marchetti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Vittorio" sort="Checchi, Vittorio" uniqKey="Checchi V" first="Vittorio" last="Checchi">Vittorio Checchi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worthington, Helen" sort="Worthington, Helen" uniqKey="Worthington H" first="Helen" last="Worthington">Helen Worthington</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20467621</idno><idno type="pmid">20467621</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001F65</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001F65</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marchetti, Claudio" sort="Marchetti, Claudio" uniqKey="Marchetti C" first="Claudio" last="Marchetti">Claudio Marchetti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Vittorio" sort="Checchi, Vittorio" uniqKey="Checchi V" first="Vittorio" last="Checchi">Vittorio Checchi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worthington, Helen" sort="Worthington, Helen" uniqKey="Worthington H" first="Helen" last="Worthington">Helen Worthington</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1756-2406</idno><imprint><date when="2008" type="published">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Absorbable Implants</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term><term>Animals</term><term>Bone Regeneration (physiology)</term><term>Bone Substitutes (therapeutic use)</term><term>Bone Transplantation (methods)</term><term>Cattle</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Graft Survival</term><term>Humans</term><term>Ilium (surgery)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (innervation)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Membranes, Artificial</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Minerals (therapeutic use)</term><term>Patient Preference</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Sensation (physiology)</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="therapeutic use" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Substitutes</term><term>Minerals</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="innervation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Regeneration</term><term>Sensation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Ilium</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Absorbable Implants</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Animals</term><term>Cattle</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Graft Survival</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Membranes, Artificial</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Preference</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the efficacy, complications and patient preference of two different techniques for vertical bone augmentation of the posterior mandible: bone blocks harvested from the iliac crest versus anorganic bovine bone blocks (Bio-Oss(R)) were used as inlays.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20467621</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2010</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>14</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1756-2406</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>1</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2008</Year><Season>Autumn</Season></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>European journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>183-98</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the efficacy, complications and patient preference of two different techniques for vertical bone augmentation of the posterior mandible: bone blocks harvested from the iliac crest versus anorganic bovine bone blocks (Bio-Oss(R)) were used as inlays.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Ten partially edentulous patients, requiring bilateral and vertical bone augmentation of the posterior mandible (having 5 to 7mm of residual crestal height and at least 5mm thickness above the mandibular canal to allow for implant placement) had their posterior mandibles randomly allocated to both interventions. Resorbable barriers were used to cover the grafts. After 4 months, implants were inserted, and after a further 4 months, provisional prostheses were inserted. Definitive prostheses were delivered 4 months later. Prosthesis and implant failures, the amount of vertically regenerated bone measured on computerised tomography (CT) scans, any complications, the time needed to fully recover mental nerve sensitivity and patient preference were all recorded. All patients were followed up for up to 1 month after the delivery of the final restorations.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Up to 5 months post-loading no patients dropped out or were excluded. Both procedures obtained significant bone gain and achieved the desired results. Four months after grafting, autogenous bone loss was on average 1.1mm (P=0.088) and Bio-Oss 0.6mm (P=0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in bone gain and maintenance among the two procedures. The sides treated with Bio-Oss recovered their full mental nerve sensitivity significantly faster than those treated with autogenous bone (4 versus 6.3 days). Three complications occurred during graft healing; two in the autogenous bone group and one determining the complete failure of the augmentation procedure. No implants or prosthesis could be placed in the planed area. There was no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of complications between the procedures. After implant placement one complication occurred in the autogenous bone group (probably as a consequence of a previous complication). Patients significantly preferred the treatment with Bio-Oss: 3 weeks after augmentation seven patients preferred Bio-Oss and three patients found the treatments to be 'equally good' (odds ratio 0.045 [5% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.87], P=0.04). One month after delivery of the final prostheses, eight patients preferred Bio-Oss and two patients found the treatments to be 'equally good' (odds ratio 0.03 [95% CI 0.00 to 0.64], P=0.02).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">This pilot study suggests that it might be sensible to use Bio-Oss blocks rather than bone harvested from the iliac crest as the interpositional graft in the treatment of resorbed posterior mandible, as patient discomfort is reduced.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Felice</LastName><ForeName>Pietro</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Marchetti</LastName><ForeName>Claudio</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Piattelli</LastName><ForeName>Adriano</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pellegrino</LastName><ForeName>Gerardo</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Checchi</LastName><ForeName>Vittorio</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Worthington</LastName><ForeName>Helen</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Esposito</LastName><ForeName>Marco</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101473719</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1756-2406</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C077540">Bio-Oss</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018786">Bone Substitutes</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D008567">Membranes, Artificial</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D008903">Minerals</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020341" MajorTopicYN="N">Absorbable Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001861" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Regeneration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018786" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Substitutes</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002417" MajorTopicYN="N">Cattle</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006085" MajorTopicYN="N">Graft Survival</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007085" MajorTopicYN="N">Ilium</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000294" MajorTopicYN="N">innervation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008567" MajorTopicYN="N">Membranes, Artificial</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008903" MajorTopicYN="N">Minerals</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="N">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057240" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Preference</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011183" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012677" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2008</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20467621</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">13931</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001F65 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001F65 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20467621
|texte= Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20467621" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |