Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.
Identifieur interne : 001815 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001814; suivant : 001816Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.
Auteurs : Luigi Checchi ; Pietro Felice ; Elisa Soardi Antonini ; Ferdinando Cosci ; Gerardo Pellegrino ; Marco EspositoSource :
- European journal of oral implantology [ 1756-2406 ] ; 2010.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods), Bone Substitutes (therapeutic use), Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Restoration, Temporary, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Headache (etiology), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Maxilla (surgery), Maxillary Sinus (surgery), Middle Aged, Pain, Postoperative (etiology), Patient Preference, Postoperative Complications, Single-Blind Method, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical , therapeutic use : Bone Substitutes.
- etiology : Headache, Pain, Postoperative.
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Maxilla, Maxillary Sinus.
- Adult, Aged, Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Restoration, Temporary, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Preference, Postoperative Complications, Single-Blind Method, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of two different techniques to lift the maxillary sinus via a crestal approach: the Summers versus the Cosci technique.
PubMed: 20847992
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20847992Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.</title><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Luigi" sort="Checchi, Luigi" uniqKey="Checchi L" first="Luigi" last="Checchi">Luigi Checchi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name></author><author><name sortKey="Antonini, Elisa Soardi" sort="Antonini, Elisa Soardi" uniqKey="Antonini E" first="Elisa Soardi" last="Antonini">Elisa Soardi Antonini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cosci, Ferdinando" sort="Cosci, Ferdinando" uniqKey="Cosci F" first="Ferdinando" last="Cosci">Ferdinando Cosci</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20847992</idno><idno type="pmid">20847992</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001815</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001815</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.</title><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Luigi" sort="Checchi, Luigi" uniqKey="Checchi L" first="Luigi" last="Checchi">Luigi Checchi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name></author><author><name sortKey="Antonini, Elisa Soardi" sort="Antonini, Elisa Soardi" uniqKey="Antonini E" first="Elisa Soardi" last="Antonini">Elisa Soardi Antonini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cosci, Ferdinando" sort="Cosci, Ferdinando" uniqKey="Cosci F" first="Ferdinando" last="Cosci">Ferdinando Cosci</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1756-2406</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term><term>Bone Substitutes (therapeutic use)</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Dental Restoration, Temporary</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Headache (etiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Maxillary Sinus (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pain, Postoperative (etiology)</term><term>Patient Preference</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Single-Blind Method</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="therapeutic use" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Substitutes</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Headache</term><term>Pain, Postoperative</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary Sinus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Dental Restoration, Temporary</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Preference</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Single-Blind Method</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the effectiveness of two different techniques to lift the maxillary sinus via a crestal approach: the Summers versus the Cosci technique.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20847992</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>12</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1756-2406</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>3</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Season>Autumn</Season></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>European journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>221-32</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the effectiveness of two different techniques to lift the maxillary sinus via a crestal approach: the Summers versus the Cosci technique.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Fifteen partially edentulous patients missing bilaterally maxillary molars and/ or premolars having 4 to 7 mm of residual crestal height and at least 5 mm thickness below the maxillary sinuses measured on computed tomography scans were randomised to have implants placed in sinuses crestally lifted according to the Cosci or Summers technique with bone substitutes according to a split-mouth design. Implants were left to heal submerged for 6 months. Implants were loaded with acrylic provisional crowns/prostheses. Screw-retained definitive metal-ceramic prostheses were delivered 4 months after provisional loading. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, any complications, operation time, operator preference, and patient preference assessed 1 month after surgery and 1 month after delivery of the final prostheses by a blinded outcome assessor. All patients were followed up to 5 months after loading (1 year after implant placement).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Nineteen study implants were placed according to each technique. No patient dropped out and no implant failed. No discomfort/complications occurred at sites treated with the Cosci technique whereas 12 patients reported discomfort during the augmentation procedure at the side treated with the Summers technique, this was statistically significant, and in one of these patients a perforation of the sinus membrane occurred. Postoperatively, headache was reported by nine patients and swelling occurred in three of these patients at the Summers treated sides. Statistically significantly less time was required to place implants according to the Cosci technique (33 versus 24 minutes, on average). The two operators and 14 out of 15 patients preferred the Cosci technique.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Both crestal sinus lift techniques were successful but the Cosci technique required less surgical time, produced less intra- and postoperative morbidity and was preferred by patients.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Checchi</LastName><ForeName>Luigi</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Felice</LastName><ForeName>Pietro</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Antonini</LastName><ForeName>Elisa Soardi</ForeName><Initials>ES</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cosci</LastName><ForeName>Ferdinando</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pellegrino</LastName><ForeName>Gerardo</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Esposito</LastName><ForeName>Marco</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101473719</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1756-2406</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018786">Bone Substitutes</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018786" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Substitutes</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="N">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003442" MajorTopicYN="N">Crowns</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000044" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Abutments</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003794" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration, Temporary</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006261" MajorTopicYN="N">Headache</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008443" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxillary Sinus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010149" MajorTopicYN="N">Pain, Postoperative</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057240" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Preference</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011183" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016037" MajorTopicYN="N">Single-Blind Method</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20847992</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">19560</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001815 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001815 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20847992
|texte= Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20847992" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |