Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.
Identifieur interne : 000F06 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000F05; suivant : 000F07Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.
Auteurs : S. Panmekiate ; W. Apinhasmit ; A. PeterssonSource :
- Dento maxillo facial radiology [ 0250-832X ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anatomy, Cross-Sectional, Cadaver, Cephalometry (methods), Cephalometry (statistics & numerical data), Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (methods), Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (statistics & numerical data), Electric Conductivity, Electric Power Supplies (statistics & numerical data), Electricity, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Male, Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Middle Aged, Observer Variation.
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- methods : Cephalometry, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
- statistics & numerical data : Cephalometry, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Electric Power Supplies.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anatomy, Cross-Sectional, Cadaver, Electric Conductivity, Electricity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare mandibular linear distances measured from cone beam CT (CBCT) images produced by different radiographic parameter settings (peak kilovoltage and milliampere value).
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/51664704
PubMed: 22499132
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22499132Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.</title><author><name sortKey="Panmekiate, S" sort="Panmekiate, S" uniqKey="Panmekiate S" first="S" last="Panmekiate">S. Panmekiate</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand. psoontra@chula.ac.th</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Apinhasmit, W" sort="Apinhasmit, W" uniqKey="Apinhasmit W" first="W" last="Apinhasmit">W. Apinhasmit</name></author><author><name sortKey="Petersson, A" sort="Petersson, A" uniqKey="Petersson A" first="A" last="Petersson">A. Petersson</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22499132</idno><idno type="pmid">22499132</idno><idno type="doi">10.1259/dmfr/51664704</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F06</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F06</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.</title><author><name sortKey="Panmekiate, S" sort="Panmekiate, S" uniqKey="Panmekiate S" first="S" last="Panmekiate">S. Panmekiate</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand. psoontra@chula.ac.th</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Apinhasmit, W" sort="Apinhasmit, W" uniqKey="Apinhasmit W" first="W" last="Apinhasmit">W. Apinhasmit</name></author><author><name sortKey="Petersson, A" sort="Petersson, A" uniqKey="Petersson A" first="A" last="Petersson">A. Petersson</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Dento maxillo facial radiology</title><idno type="ISSN">0250-832X</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Cephalometry (methods)</term><term>Cephalometry (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (methods)</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Electric Conductivity</term><term>Electric Power Supplies (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Electricity</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Observer Variation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Cephalometry</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Cephalometry</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Electric Power Supplies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</term><term>Cadaver</term><term>Electric Conductivity</term><term>Electricity</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Observer Variation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study was to compare mandibular linear distances measured from cone beam CT (CBCT) images produced by different radiographic parameter settings (peak kilovoltage and milliampere value).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22499132</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0250-832X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>41</Volume><Issue>7</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Dento maxillo facial radiology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>578-82</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1259/dmfr/51664704</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The purpose of this study was to compare mandibular linear distances measured from cone beam CT (CBCT) images produced by different radiographic parameter settings (peak kilovoltage and milliampere value).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">20 cadaver hemimandibles with edentulous ridges posterior to the mental foramen were embedded in clear resin blocks and scanned by a CBCT machine (CB MercuRay(TM); Hitachi Medico Technology Corp., Chiba-ken, Japan). The radiographic parameters comprised four peak kilovoltage settings (60 kVp, 80 kVp, 100 kVp and 120 kVp) and two milliampere settings (10 mA and 15 mA). A 102.4 mm field of view was chosen. Each hemimandible was scanned 8 times with 8 different parameter combinations resulting in 160 CBCT data sets. On the cross-sectional images, six linear distances were measured. To assess the intraobserver variation, the 160 data sets were remeasured after 2 weeks. The measurement precision was calculated using Dahlberg's formula. With the same peak kilovoltage, the measurements yielded by different milliampere values were compared using the paired t-test. With the same milliampere value, the measurements yielded by different peak kilovoltage were compared using analysis of variance. A significant difference was considered when p < 0.05.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Measurement precision varied from 0.03 mm to 0.28 mm. No significant differences in the distances were found among the different radiographic parameter combinations.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Based upon the specific machine in the present study, low peak kilovoltage and milliampere value might be used for linear measurements in the posterior mandible.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Panmekiate</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Radiology, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand. psoontra@chula.ac.th</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Apinhasmit</LastName><ForeName>W</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Petersson</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>12</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7609576</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0250-832X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Radiol Med. 2010 Jun;115(4):600-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20177988</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):461-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18639404</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jan;55(1):141-58</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21094723</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):76-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21239569</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):267-71</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21196094</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 May;89(5):630-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10807723</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Oct;13(5):566-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12674118</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):228-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15101594</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jan;33(1):51-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15140823</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):731-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15508990</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Spring;5(1):23-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2391136</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995 Jun;6(2):96-103</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7578787</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Appl Radiat Isot. 1999 Jan;50(1):1-19</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10028625</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Appl Radiat Isot. 1999 Jan;50(1):21-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10028626</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992 Jun;3(2):90-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15900674</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Oct;100(4):395-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16182157</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):211-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16461498</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):402-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17709072</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):81-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17956572</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jan;37(1):10-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18195249</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Feb;133(2):317-27</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18249300</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jun;105(6):773-82</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18424119</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):106-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18504152</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Sep;37(6):309-18</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18757715</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Feb;38(2):79-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19176649</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 2009 Apr 11;206(7):365-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19357667</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Sep;108(3):e108-16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19716480</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Sep;110(3):e29-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20598589</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019412" MajorTopicYN="N">Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002102" MajorTopicYN="N">Cadaver</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002508" MajorTopicYN="N">Cephalometry</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054893" MajorTopicYN="N">Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004553" MajorTopicYN="N">Electric Conductivity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011211" MajorTopicYN="N">Electric Power Supplies</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004560" MajorTopicYN="N">Electricity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015588" MajorTopicYN="N">Observer Variation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3608379</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22499132</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">51664704</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1259/dmfr/51664704</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3608379</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F06 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F06 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22499132
|texte= Effect of electric potential and current on mandibular linear measurements in cone beam CT.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22499132" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |