Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Clinical assessment of submerged vs non-submerged implants placed in pristine bone

Identifieur interne : 002513 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 002512; suivant : 002514

Clinical assessment of submerged vs non-submerged implants placed in pristine bone

Auteurs : P. Cardelli ; F. Cecchetti ; M. Montani ; E. Bramanti ; C. Arcuri

Source :

RBID : PMC:4051271

Abstract

SUMMARY

The medium-long term success of osseointegrated dental implants is evaluated on the basis of the degree of osseointegration over time, assessed by radiographic or instrumental analysis (ISQ). Over the years, the question has always been which surgical technique can provide a better performance in the medium-long term and, thanks to literature studies, it has been evidenced that there are no differences between “one stage” and “two stage” interventions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic parameters, referring to interventions for the insertion of dental implants characterized by a new kind of implant surface (Synthegra® GEASS, Udine). The prospective study, not randomized and controlled, referred to the insertion of 18 implants on 9 patients with mono or bilateral edentulism, with measurements at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and an overall follow-up at 3 years, in order to evaluate the different degree of crestal bone resorption using the submerged and transmucosal surgical technique. The results of our study show that there are no differences in the resorption of the two surgical techniques, with an average bone resorption of 2,05±0,16 mm, comparable with values reported in literature.


Url:
PubMed: 24971162
PubMed Central: 4051271

Links to Exploration step

PMC:4051271

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Clinical assessment of submerged
<italic>vs</italic>
non-submerged implants placed in pristine bone</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cardelli, P" sort="Cardelli, P" uniqKey="Cardelli P" first="P." last="Cardelli">P. Cardelli</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cecchetti, F" sort="Cecchetti, F" uniqKey="Cecchetti F" first="F." last="Cecchetti">F. Cecchetti</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Montani, M" sort="Montani, M" uniqKey="Montani M" first="M." last="Montani">M. Montani</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bramanti, E" sort="Bramanti, E" uniqKey="Bramanti E" first="E." last="Bramanti">E. Bramanti</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-89-93">Department of Experimental Medical-Surgical and Oral Dental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Arcuri, C" sort="Arcuri, C" uniqKey="Arcuri C" first="C." last="Arcuri">C. Arcuri</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24971162</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4051271</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051271</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4051271</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002513</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002513</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Clinical assessment of submerged
<italic>vs</italic>
non-submerged implants placed in pristine bone</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cardelli, P" sort="Cardelli, P" uniqKey="Cardelli P" first="P." last="Cardelli">P. Cardelli</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cecchetti, F" sort="Cecchetti, F" uniqKey="Cecchetti F" first="F." last="Cecchetti">F. Cecchetti</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Montani, M" sort="Montani, M" uniqKey="Montani M" first="M." last="Montani">M. Montani</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bramanti, E" sort="Bramanti, E" uniqKey="Bramanti E" first="E." last="Bramanti">E. Bramanti</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-89-93">Department of Experimental Medical-Surgical and Oral Dental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Arcuri, C" sort="Arcuri, C" uniqKey="Arcuri C" first="C." last="Arcuri">C. Arcuri</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-89-93">Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Oral & Implantology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1974-5648</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">2035-2468</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<title>SUMMARY</title>
<p>The medium-long term success of osseointegrated dental implants is evaluated on the basis of the degree of osseointegration over time, assessed by radiographic or instrumental analysis (ISQ). Over the years, the question has always been which surgical technique can provide a better performance in the medium-long term and, thanks to literature studies, it has been evidenced that there are no differences between “one stage” and “two stage” interventions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic parameters, referring to interventions for the insertion of dental implants characterized by a new kind of implant surface (Synthegra® GEASS, Udine). The prospective study, not randomized and controlled, referred to the insertion of 18 implants on 9 patients with mono or bilateral edentulism, with measurements at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and an overall follow-up at 3 years, in order to evaluate the different degree of crestal bone resorption using the submerged and transmucosal surgical technique. The results of our study show that there are no differences in the resorption of the two surgical techniques, with an average bone resorption of 2,05±0,16 mm, comparable with values reported in literature.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OAI</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Oral & Implantology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1974-5648</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2035-2468</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24971162</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4051271</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">89-93</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Clinical assessment of submerged
<italic>vs</italic>
non-submerged implants placed in pristine bone</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>CARDELLI</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-89-93">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>CECCHETTI</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-89-93">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>MONTANI</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-89-93">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>BRAMANTI</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-89-93">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>ARCURI</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-89-93">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-89-93">
<label>1</label>
Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, UOCC Odontostomatology “S. Giovanni Calibita-Fatebenefratelli” Hospital, Rome, Italy</aff>
<aff id="af2-89-93">
<label>2</label>
Department of Experimental Medical-Surgical and Oral Dental Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>4</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>89</fpage>
<lpage>93</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>©2013 CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Rome, Italy</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2013</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<title>SUMMARY</title>
<p>The medium-long term success of osseointegrated dental implants is evaluated on the basis of the degree of osseointegration over time, assessed by radiographic or instrumental analysis (ISQ). Over the years, the question has always been which surgical technique can provide a better performance in the medium-long term and, thanks to literature studies, it has been evidenced that there are no differences between “one stage” and “two stage” interventions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic parameters, referring to interventions for the insertion of dental implants characterized by a new kind of implant surface (Synthegra® GEASS, Udine). The prospective study, not randomized and controlled, referred to the insertion of 18 implants on 9 patients with mono or bilateral edentulism, with measurements at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and an overall follow-up at 3 years, in order to evaluate the different degree of crestal bone resorption using the submerged and transmucosal surgical technique. The results of our study show that there are no differences in the resorption of the two surgical techniques, with an average bone resorption of 2,05±0,16 mm, comparable with values reported in literature.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>submerged healing abutment</kwd>
<kwd>non-submerged healing abutment</kwd>
<kwd>dental implant</kwd>
<kwd>crestal bone levels</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002513 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002513 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4051271
   |texte=   Clinical assessment of submerged vs non-submerged implants placed in pristine bone
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24971162" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022