Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year

Identifieur interne : 002511 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 002510; suivant : 002512

Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year

Auteurs : M. Gargari ; V. Prete ; M. Pujia ; F. M. Ceruso

Source :

RBID : PMC:3671817

Abstract

SUMMARY

Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year.

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare functional efficiency and patients satisfaction between tooth-supported and implant-supported overdenture through a questionnaire that accurately reflects the real concerns of patients with dental prosthesis.

Methods

Forty-three patients were selected from the out patient clinic, Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy. Their age were ranging from 61 to 83 years. Eighteen patients were rehabilitated with overdentures supported by natural teeth and twenty-five with overdentures implant-supported.

Discussion and Result

The questionnaire proposed one year after the insertion of the prosthetis has showed that there isn’t difference statistically significant in terms of function, phonetics and aesthetics between overdenture implant-supported and tooth-supported.

Conclusions

The results of the questionnaire showed that the patients generally had a high level of satisfaction concern to the masticatory function, esthetics and phonetics. In addition, on average, they haven’t difficulty in removal and insertion of the denture and in oral hygiene. They haven’t in both groups problems related to fractures.


Url:
PubMed: 23741602
PubMed Central: 3671817

Links to Exploration step

PMC:3671817

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gargari, M" sort="Gargari, M" uniqKey="Gargari M" first="M." last="Gargari">M. Gargari</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-oai-5-4-86">Department of Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-oai-5-4-86">Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Prete, V" sort="Prete, V" uniqKey="Prete V" first="V." last="Prete">V. Prete</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-oai-5-4-86">Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pujia, M" sort="Pujia, M" uniqKey="Pujia M" first="M." last="Pujia">M. Pujia</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-oai-5-4-86">Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ceruso, F M" sort="Ceruso, F M" uniqKey="Ceruso F" first="F. M." last="Ceruso">F. M. Ceruso</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-oai-5-4-86">Department of Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23741602</idno>
<idno type="pmc">3671817</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671817</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3671817</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002511</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">002511</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gargari, M" sort="Gargari, M" uniqKey="Gargari M" first="M." last="Gargari">M. Gargari</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-oai-5-4-86">Department of Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-oai-5-4-86">Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Prete, V" sort="Prete, V" uniqKey="Prete V" first="V." last="Prete">V. Prete</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-oai-5-4-86">Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pujia, M" sort="Pujia, M" uniqKey="Pujia M" first="M." last="Pujia">M. Pujia</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af2-oai-5-4-86">Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ceruso, F M" sort="Ceruso, F M" uniqKey="Ceruso F" first="F. M." last="Ceruso">F. M. Ceruso</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:aff id="af1-oai-5-4-86">Department of Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Oral & Implantology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1974-5648</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">2035-2468</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<title>SUMMARY</title>
<p>
<bold>Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year.</bold>
</p>
<sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>The aim of this study is to compare functional efficiency and patients satisfaction between tooth-supported and implant-supported overdenture through a questionnaire that accurately reflects the real concerns of patients with dental prosthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Forty-three patients were selected from the out patient clinic, Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy. Their age were ranging from 61 to 83 years. Eighteen patients were rehabilitated with overdentures supported by natural teeth and twenty-five with overdentures implant-supported.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion and Result</title>
<p>The questionnaire proposed one year after the insertion of the prosthetis has showed that there isn’t difference statistically significant in terms of function, phonetics and aesthetics between overdenture implant-supported and tooth-supported.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The results of the questionnaire showed that the patients generally had a high level of satisfaction concern to the masticatory function, esthetics and phonetics. In addition, on average, they haven’t difficulty in removal and insertion of the denture and in oral hygiene. They haven’t in both groups problems related to fractures.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Oral Implantol (Rome)</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OAI</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Oral & Implantology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1974-5648</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2035-2468</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>CIC Edizioni Internationali</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">23741602</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3671817</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">oai-5-4-86</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>GARGARI</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-oai-5-4-86"></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-oai-5-4-86">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-oai-5-4-86">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>PRETE</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-oai-5-4-86">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>PUJIA</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-oai-5-4-86">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>CERUSO</surname>
<given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-oai-5-4-86">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-oai-5-4-86">
<label>1</label>
Department of Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy</aff>
<aff id="af2-oai-5-4-86">
<label>2</label>
Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-oai-5-4-86">Correspndence to: Marco Gargari, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Department of Dentistry “ Fra G.B. Orsenigo, Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Via Cassia, 600, 00189 Rome, Italy, e-mail:
<email>marco.gargari@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2013</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<season>Oct-Dec</season>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>86</fpage>
<lpage>91</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>©2012 CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Rome, Italy</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2012</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<title>SUMMARY</title>
<p>
<bold>Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year.</bold>
</p>
<sec>
<title>Objective</title>
<p>The aim of this study is to compare functional efficiency and patients satisfaction between tooth-supported and implant-supported overdenture through a questionnaire that accurately reflects the real concerns of patients with dental prosthesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Forty-three patients were selected from the out patient clinic, Department of Dentistry “Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”, Rome, Italy. Their age were ranging from 61 to 83 years. Eighteen patients were rehabilitated with overdentures supported by natural teeth and twenty-five with overdentures implant-supported.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion and Result</title>
<p>The questionnaire proposed one year after the insertion of the prosthetis has showed that there isn’t difference statistically significant in terms of function, phonetics and aesthetics between overdenture implant-supported and tooth-supported.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The results of the questionnaire showed that the patients generally had a high level of satisfaction concern to the masticatory function, esthetics and phonetics. In addition, on average, they haven’t difficulty in removal and insertion of the denture and in oral hygiene. They haven’t in both groups problems related to fractures.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>overdenture</kwd>
<kwd>prosthethic reabilitation</kwd>
<kwd>questionnaire</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002511 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002511 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:3671817
   |texte=   Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23741602" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022