Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient
Identifieur interne : 000436 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000435; suivant : 000437Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient
Auteurs : C. Spencer Cochran ; Yadranko Ducic ; Robert J. DefattaSource :
- The Laryngoscope [ 0023-852X ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to review our favorable experience in performing rhinoplasty in aging patients. Methods: All patients aged 65 years or greater who underwent rhinoplasty, either esthetic or functional, by the senior author (Y.D.) from August 1997 to July 2005 with a minimum follow up of 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and had complete records available for review. The average age was 69.5 years (range, 65-82 years) with 24 female and 27 male patients. All but two patients underwent open rhinoplasty. Eighteen procedures represented secondary rhinoplasties. Seven patients required auricular cartilage grafts, and 11 patients required costal cartilage grafts. One costal cartilage graft was aborted as a result of excessive calcification. All patients underwent columellar strut placement, 92% underwent internal valve grafts, and 80.4% underwent grafting of the external nasal valves. Nasal osteotomies were performed in only 23.5% of patients, all with the percutaneous technique. Revision surgery was necessary in only three (5.8%) patients, all of whom required grafting of the external valve (not performed primarily). In each of these cases, no significant external valve collapse was noted preoperatively. Premaxillary augmentation with diced or crushed cartilage grafts was performed in 81.8% (n = 18) of patients with an edentulous maxillary arch. Conclusions: Aging patients present unique technical challenges in rhinoplasty that warrant a comprehensive approach to restore internal and external valve competency and tip support. Consideration of prophylactic external valve grafts in addition to the routine use of internal valve grafts and columellar struts may help decrease the need for revision surgery in this patient population. Reasonable functional and esthetic outcomes can be expected in the aging patient.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 07-0250208 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient |
| AU : | SPENCER COCHRAN (C.); DUCIC (Yadranko); DEFATTA (Robert J.) |
| AF : | Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas/Dallas, Texas/Etats-Unis; Division of Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital/Fort Worth, Texas/Etats-Unis |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | The Laryngoscope; ISSN 0023-852X; Coden LARYA8; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 117; No. 5; Pp. 803-807; Bibl. 19 ref. |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | Objective: The objective of this study is to review our favorable experience in performing rhinoplasty in aging patients. Methods: All patients aged 65 years or greater who underwent rhinoplasty, either esthetic or functional, by the senior author (Y.D.) from August 1997 to July 2005 with a minimum follow up of 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and had complete records available for review. The average age was 69.5 years (range, 65-82 years) with 24 female and 27 male patients. All but two patients underwent open rhinoplasty. Eighteen procedures represented secondary rhinoplasties. Seven patients required auricular cartilage grafts, and 11 patients required costal cartilage grafts. One costal cartilage graft was aborted as a result of excessive calcification. All patients underwent columellar strut placement, 92% underwent internal valve grafts, and 80.4% underwent grafting of the external nasal valves. Nasal osteotomies were performed in only 23.5% of patients, all with the percutaneous technique. Revision surgery was necessary in only three (5.8%) patients, all of whom required grafting of the external valve (not performed primarily). In each of these cases, no significant external valve collapse was noted preoperatively. Premaxillary augmentation with diced or crushed cartilage grafts was performed in 81.8% (n = 18) of patients with an edentulous maxillary arch. Conclusions: Aging patients present unique technical challenges in rhinoplasty that warrant a comprehensive approach to restore internal and external valve competency and tip support. Consideration of prophylactic external valve grafts in addition to the routine use of internal valve grafts and columellar struts may help decrease the need for revision surgery in this patient population. Reasonable functional and esthetic outcomes can be expected in the aging patient. |
| CC : | 002B10; 002B11B |
| FD : | Obstruction voies respiratoires; Plastie; Chirurgie plastique; Nez; Stomatologie; Vieillissement; Homme; Personne âgée; ORL; Traitement; Rhinoplastie |
| FG : | Appareil respiratoire pathologie |
| ED : | Airways obstruction; Plasty; Plastic surgery; Nose; Stomatology; Ageing; Human; Elderly; ENT; Treatment; Rhinoplasty |
| EG : | Respiratory disease |
| SD : | Obstrucción de las vías respiratorias; Plastia; Cirugía plástica; Nariz; Estomatología; Envejecimiento; Hombre; Anciano; ORL; Tratamiento |
| LO : | INIST-3102.354000159938510080 |
| ID : | 07-0250208 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:07-0250208Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient</title><author><name sortKey="Spencer Cochran, C" sort="Spencer Cochran, C" uniqKey="Spencer Cochran C" first="C." last="Spencer Cochran">C. Spencer Cochran</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas</s1><s2>Dallas, Texas</s2><s3>USA</s3></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Division of Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital</s1><s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2><s3>USA</s3></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ducic, Yadranko" sort="Ducic, Yadranko" uniqKey="Ducic Y" first="Yadranko" last="Ducic">Yadranko Ducic</name></author><author><name sortKey="Defatta, Robert J" sort="Defatta, Robert J" uniqKey="Defatta R" first="Robert J." last="Defatta">Robert J. Defatta</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">07-0250208</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0250208 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0250208</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000436</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient</title><author><name sortKey="Spencer Cochran, C" sort="Spencer Cochran, C" uniqKey="Spencer Cochran C" first="C." last="Spencer Cochran">C. Spencer Cochran</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas</s1><s2>Dallas, Texas</s2><s3>USA</s3></inist:fA14></affiliation><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Division of Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital</s1><s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2><s3>USA</s3></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ducic, Yadranko" sort="Ducic, Yadranko" uniqKey="Ducic Y" first="Yadranko" last="Ducic">Yadranko Ducic</name></author><author><name sortKey="Defatta, Robert J" sort="Defatta, Robert J" uniqKey="Defatta R" first="Robert J." last="Defatta">Robert J. Defatta</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">The Laryngoscope</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Laryngoscope</title><idno type="ISSN">0023-852X</idno><imprint><date when="2007">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">The Laryngoscope</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Laryngoscope</title><idno type="ISSN">0023-852X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ageing</term><term>Airways obstruction</term><term>ENT</term><term>Elderly</term><term>Human</term><term>Nose</term><term>Plastic surgery</term><term>Plasty</term><term>Rhinoplasty</term><term>Stomatology</term><term>Treatment</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Obstruction voies respiratoires</term><term>Plastie</term><term>Chirurgie plastique</term><term>Nez</term><term>Stomatologie</term><term>Vieillissement</term><term>Homme</term><term>Personne âgée</term><term>ORL</term><term>Traitement</term><term>Rhinoplastie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective: The objective of this study is to review our favorable experience in performing rhinoplasty in aging patients. Methods: All patients aged 65 years or greater who underwent rhinoplasty, either esthetic or functional, by the senior author (Y.D.) from August 1997 to July 2005 with a minimum follow up of 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and had complete records available for review. The average age was 69.5 years (range, 65-82 years) with 24 female and 27 male patients. All but two patients underwent open rhinoplasty. Eighteen procedures represented secondary rhinoplasties. Seven patients required auricular cartilage grafts, and 11 patients required costal cartilage grafts. One costal cartilage graft was aborted as a result of excessive calcification. All patients underwent columellar strut placement, 92% underwent internal valve grafts, and 80.4% underwent grafting of the external nasal valves. Nasal osteotomies were performed in only 23.5% of patients, all with the percutaneous technique. Revision surgery was necessary in only three (5.8%) patients, all of whom required grafting of the external valve (not performed primarily). In each of these cases, no significant external valve collapse was noted preoperatively. Premaxillary augmentation with diced or crushed cartilage grafts was performed in 81.8% (n = 18) of patients with an edentulous maxillary arch. Conclusions: Aging patients present unique technical challenges in rhinoplasty that warrant a comprehensive approach to restore internal and external valve competency and tip support. Consideration of prophylactic external valve grafts in addition to the routine use of internal valve grafts and columellar struts may help decrease the need for revision surgery in this patient population. Reasonable functional and esthetic outcomes can be expected in the aging patient.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0023-852X</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>LARYA8</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Laryngoscope</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>117</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>5</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SPENCER COCHRAN (C.)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>DUCIC (Yadranko)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>DEFATTA (Robert J.)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas</s1><s2>Dallas, Texas</s2><s3>USA</s3></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>Division of Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital</s1><s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2><s3>USA</s3></fA14><fA20><s1>803-807</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2007</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>3102</s2><s5>354000159938510080</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>19 ref.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0250208</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>The Laryngoscope</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Objective: The objective of this study is to review our favorable experience in performing rhinoplasty in aging patients. Methods: All patients aged 65 years or greater who underwent rhinoplasty, either esthetic or functional, by the senior author (Y.D.) from August 1997 to July 2005 with a minimum follow up of 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and had complete records available for review. The average age was 69.5 years (range, 65-82 years) with 24 female and 27 male patients. All but two patients underwent open rhinoplasty. Eighteen procedures represented secondary rhinoplasties. Seven patients required auricular cartilage grafts, and 11 patients required costal cartilage grafts. One costal cartilage graft was aborted as a result of excessive calcification. All patients underwent columellar strut placement, 92% underwent internal valve grafts, and 80.4% underwent grafting of the external nasal valves. Nasal osteotomies were performed in only 23.5% of patients, all with the percutaneous technique. Revision surgery was necessary in only three (5.8%) patients, all of whom required grafting of the external valve (not performed primarily). In each of these cases, no significant external valve collapse was noted preoperatively. Premaxillary augmentation with diced or crushed cartilage grafts was performed in 81.8% (n = 18) of patients with an edentulous maxillary arch. Conclusions: Aging patients present unique technical challenges in rhinoplasty that warrant a comprehensive approach to restore internal and external valve competency and tip support. Consideration of prophylactic external valve grafts in addition to the routine use of internal valve grafts and columellar struts may help decrease the need for revision surgery in this patient population. Reasonable functional and esthetic outcomes can be expected in the aging patient.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B11B</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Obstruction voies respiratoires</s0><s2>NM</s2><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Airways obstruction</s0><s2>NM</s2><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Obstrucción de las vías respiratorias</s0><s2>NM</s2><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Plastie</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Plasty</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Plastia</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie plastique</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Plastic surgery</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía plástica</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Nez</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nose</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Nariz</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vieillissement</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ageing</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Envejecimiento</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Personne âgée</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Elderly</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Anciano</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>ORL</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>ENT</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>ORL</s0><s5>15</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0><s5>30</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rhinoplastie</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>96</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rhinoplasty</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>96</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Appareil respiratoire pathologie</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Respiratory disease</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aparato respiratorio patología</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>169</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 07-0250208 INIST</NO><ET>Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient</ET><AU>SPENCER COCHRAN (C.); DUCIC (Yadranko); DEFATTA (Robert J.)</AU><AF>Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas/Dallas, Texas/Etats-Unis; Division of Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital/Fort Worth, Texas/Etats-Unis</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>The Laryngoscope; ISSN 0023-852X; Coden LARYA8; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 117; No. 5; Pp. 803-807; Bibl. 19 ref.</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>Objective: The objective of this study is to review our favorable experience in performing rhinoplasty in aging patients. Methods: All patients aged 65 years or greater who underwent rhinoplasty, either esthetic or functional, by the senior author (Y.D.) from August 1997 to July 2005 with a minimum follow up of 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and had complete records available for review. The average age was 69.5 years (range, 65-82 years) with 24 female and 27 male patients. All but two patients underwent open rhinoplasty. Eighteen procedures represented secondary rhinoplasties. Seven patients required auricular cartilage grafts, and 11 patients required costal cartilage grafts. One costal cartilage graft was aborted as a result of excessive calcification. All patients underwent columellar strut placement, 92% underwent internal valve grafts, and 80.4% underwent grafting of the external nasal valves. Nasal osteotomies were performed in only 23.5% of patients, all with the percutaneous technique. Revision surgery was necessary in only three (5.8%) patients, all of whom required grafting of the external valve (not performed primarily). In each of these cases, no significant external valve collapse was noted preoperatively. Premaxillary augmentation with diced or crushed cartilage grafts was performed in 81.8% (n = 18) of patients with an edentulous maxillary arch. Conclusions: Aging patients present unique technical challenges in rhinoplasty that warrant a comprehensive approach to restore internal and external valve competency and tip support. Consideration of prophylactic external valve grafts in addition to the routine use of internal valve grafts and columellar struts may help decrease the need for revision surgery in this patient population. Reasonable functional and esthetic outcomes can be expected in the aging patient.</EA><CC>002B10; 002B11B</CC><FD>Obstruction voies respiratoires; Plastie; Chirurgie plastique; Nez; Stomatologie; Vieillissement; Homme; Personne âgée; ORL; Traitement; Rhinoplastie</FD><FG>Appareil respiratoire pathologie</FG><ED>Airways obstruction; Plasty; Plastic surgery; Nose; Stomatology; Ageing; Human; Elderly; ENT; Treatment; Rhinoplasty</ED><EG>Respiratory disease</EG><SD>Obstrucción de las vías respiratorias; Plastia; Cirugía plástica; Nariz; Estomatología; Envejecimiento; Hombre; Anciano; ORL; Tratamiento</SD><LO>INIST-3102.354000159938510080</LO><ID>07-0250208</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000436 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000436 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:07-0250208
|texte= Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |