Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study

Identifieur interne : 000269 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000268; suivant : 000270

Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study

Auteurs : Henny J. A. Meijer ; Gerry M. Raghoebar ; Rutger H. K. Batenburg ; Arjan Vissink

Source :

RBID : Pascal:09-0367896

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0303-6979
A03   1    @0 J. clin. periodontol.
A05       @2 36
A06       @2 9
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study
A11 01  1    @1 MEIJER (Henny J. A.)
A11 02  1    @1 RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.)
A11 03  1    @1 BATENBURG (Rutger H. K.)
A11 04  1    @1 VISSINK (Arjan)
A14 01      @1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen @2 Groningen @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 4 aut.
A14 02      @1 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen @2 Groningen @3 NLD @Z 1 aut.
A14 03      @1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital @2 Vlissingen @3 NLD @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 799-806
A21       @1 2009
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 16273 @5 354000172580140110
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 3/4 p.
A47 01  1    @0 09-0367896
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of clinical periodontology
A66 01      @0 GBR
C01 01    ENG  @0 Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.
C02 01  X    @0 002B10C02
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Edentation @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Edentulousness @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Edentación @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Mandibule @5 07
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Mandible @5 07
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Mandíbula @5 07
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Implant @5 08
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Implant @5 08
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Implante @5 08
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Dent @5 09
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Tooth @5 09
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Diente @5 09
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Dentisterie @5 30
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Dentistry @5 30
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Odontología @5 30
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Pathologie dentaire @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Dental disease @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Diente patología @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Stomatologie @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Stomatology @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Estomatología @5 38
N21       @1 264
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 09-0367896 INIST
ET : Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study
AU : MEIJER (Henny J. A.); RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.); BATENBURG (Rutger H. K.); VISSINK (Arjan)
AF : Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital/Vlissingen/Pays-Bas (3 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of clinical periodontology; ISSN 0303-6979; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2009; Vol. 36; No. 9; Pp. 799-806; Bibl. 3/4 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.
CC : 002B10C02
FD : Edentation; Mandibule; Implant; Dent; Dentisterie
FG : Pathologie dentaire; Stomatologie
ED : Edentulousness; Mandible; Implant; Tooth; Dentistry
EG : Dental disease; Stomatology
SD : Edentación; Mandíbula; Implante; Diente; Odontología
LO : INIST-16273.354000172580140110
ID : 09-0367896

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:09-0367896

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Batenburg, Rutger H K" sort="Batenburg, Rutger H K" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="Rutger H. K." last="Batenburg">Rutger H. K. Batenburg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital</s1>
<s2>Vlissingen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0367896</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0367896 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0367896</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000269</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Batenburg, Rutger H K" sort="Batenburg, Rutger H K" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="Rutger H. K." last="Batenburg">Rutger H. K. Batenburg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital</s1>
<s2>Vlissingen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Edentation</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0303-6979</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. clin. periodontol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>36</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>9</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>MEIJER (Henny J. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>BATENBURG (Rutger H. K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>VISSINK (Arjan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital</s1>
<s2>Vlissingen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>799-806</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>16273</s2>
<s5>354000172580140110</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>09-0367896</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of clinical periodontology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>264</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 09-0367896 INIST</NO>
<ET>Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</ET>
<AU>MEIJER (Henny J. A.); RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.); BATENBURG (Rutger H. K.); VISSINK (Arjan)</AU>
<AF>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital/Vlissingen/Pays-Bas (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of clinical periodontology; ISSN 0303-6979; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2009; Vol. 36; No. 9; Pp. 799-806; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02</CC>
<FD>Edentation; Mandibule; Implant; Dent; Dentisterie</FD>
<FG>Pathologie dentaire; Stomatologie</FG>
<ED>Edentulousness; Mandible; Implant; Tooth; Dentistry</ED>
<EG>Dental disease; Stomatology</EG>
<SD>Edentación; Mandíbula; Implante; Diente; Odontología</SD>
<LO>INIST-16273.354000172580140110</LO>
<ID>09-0367896</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000269 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000269 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:09-0367896
   |texte=   Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022