Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study
Identifieur interne : 000269 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000268; suivant : 000270Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study
Auteurs : Henny J. A. Meijer ; Gerry M. Raghoebar ; Rutger H. K. Batenburg ; Arjan VissinkSource :
- Journal of clinical periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2009.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 09-0367896 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study |
AU : | MEIJER (Henny J. A.); RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.); BATENBURG (Rutger H. K.); VISSINK (Arjan) |
AF : | Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital/Vlissingen/Pays-Bas (3 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of clinical periodontology; ISSN 0303-6979; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2009; Vol. 36; No. 9; Pp. 799-806; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems. |
CC : | 002B10C02 |
FD : | Edentation; Mandibule; Implant; Dent; Dentisterie |
FG : | Pathologie dentaire; Stomatologie |
ED : | Edentulousness; Mandible; Implant; Tooth; Dentistry |
EG : | Dental disease; Stomatology |
SD : | Edentación; Mandíbula; Implante; Diente; Odontología |
LO : | INIST-16273.354000172580140110 |
ID : | 09-0367896 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:09-0367896Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Batenburg, Rutger H K" sort="Batenburg, Rutger H K" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="Rutger H. K." last="Batenburg">Rutger H. K. Batenburg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital</s1>
<s2>Vlissingen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0367896</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 09-0367896 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:09-0367896</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000269</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</title>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Batenburg, Rutger H K" sort="Batenburg, Rutger H K" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="Rutger H. K." last="Batenburg">Rutger H. K. Batenburg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital</s1>
<s2>Vlissingen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Edentation</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0303-6979</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. clin. periodontol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>36</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>9</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MEIJER (Henny J. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>BATENBURG (Rutger H. K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>VISSINK (Arjan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital</s1>
<s2>Vlissingen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>799-806</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>16273</s2>
<s5>354000172580140110</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>09-0367896</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of clinical periodontology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mandibule</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mandible</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mandíbula</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>264</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 09-0367896 INIST</NO>
<ET>Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study</ET>
<AU>MEIJER (Henny J. A.); RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.); BATENBURG (Rutger H. K.); VISSINK (Arjan)</AU>
<AF>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut., 4 aut.); Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Walcheren Hospital/Vlissingen/Pays-Bas (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of clinical periodontology; ISSN 0303-6979; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2009; Vol. 36; No. 9; Pp. 799-806; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Objectives: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the survival rate, condition of peri-implant tissues, patient satisfaction and surgical and prosthetic aftercare of the IMZ-implant system (two-stage cylinder type), the Brånemark-implant system (two-stage screw type) and the ITI-implant system (one-stage screw type) supporting a mandibular overdenture during a 10-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Three groups of 30 edentulous patients were treated with two endosseous implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment and after 1, 5 and 10 years of functional loading. Prosthetic and surgical aftercare was scored during the evaluation period, as well as patient satisfaction. Results: The 10-year survival rate was 93% for the IMZ group, 98% for the Brånemark group and 100% for the ITI group (IMZ < ITI, p < 0.05). Mean marginal bone loss was limited over a period of 10 years. No differences in satisfaction and aftercare were observed between the groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that two implants placed in the interforaminal region, connected with a bar, supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the edentulous patient. After10 years, no relevant changes had developed between the three implant systems.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02</CC>
<FD>Edentation; Mandibule; Implant; Dent; Dentisterie</FD>
<FG>Pathologie dentaire; Stomatologie</FG>
<ED>Edentulousness; Mandible; Implant; Tooth; Dentistry</ED>
<EG>Dental disease; Stomatology</EG>
<SD>Edentación; Mandíbula; Implante; Diente; Odontología</SD>
<LO>INIST-16273.354000172580140110</LO>
<ID>09-0367896</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000269 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000269 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:09-0367896 |texte= Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |