Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome

Identifieur interne : 000241 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000240; suivant : 000242

Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome

Auteurs : Wael Att ; Jasmin Bernhart ; Jörg Rudolf Strub

Source :

RBID : Pascal:10-0037300

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present report was to describe the different treatment approaches available for fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla in the presence of varying hard and soft tissue conditions and to review the clinical outcome of each treatment approach. Materials and Methods: A review of the published data published from 1980 through 2009 was conducted using electronic databases and manual searching to identify the treatment possibilities for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and report their clinical outcomes. The search terms used, in simple or multiple conjunctions, were "fixed rehabilitation," "implants," "edentulous," "fixed dental prosthesis," "implant-supported," and "maxilla." Results: Several treatment modalities were identified for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla, with and without bone augmentation procedures. Regular, tilted, and zygoma implants were identified for treatment modalities that do not require bone augmentation. Sinus floor elevation with the lateral window technique or Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts was identified as a treatment possibility that required bone augmentation procedures. The database initially yielded 230 titles. Of the 230 studies, 42 were finally selected. Although all studies reported the survival rates of the implants, only 20 provided information about the prosthetic outcome. Because of the limited number of studies, at least for the specific treatment modalities, and the heterogeneity in the design of the different studies identified, it was not possible to perform a statistical analysis of the data. Except for regular implants placed in native bone, no sufficient long-term clinical studies were found for the other procedures. Conclusions: Except for regular implants placed in nonaugmented native bone, the published data provide insufficient evidence about the outcome of other procedures. Until long-term data are available, such procedures should not be considered reliable treatment modalities.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0278-2391
A02 01      @0 JOMSDA
A03   1    @0 J. oral maxillofac. surg.
A05       @2 67
A06       @2 11 @3 SUP3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome
A09 01  1  ENG  @1 INTERDISCIPLINARY ADVANCES IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY
A11 01  1    @1 ATT (Wael)
A11 02  1    @1 BERNHART (Jasmin)
A11 03  1    @1 STRUB (Jörg Rudolf)
A12 01  1    @1 BLOCK (Michael S.) @9 ed.
A14 01      @1 Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry @2 Freiburg @3 DEU @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 60-73
A21       @1 2009
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 3005 @5 354000170162300070
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 79 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 10-0037300
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Purpose: The aim of the present report was to describe the different treatment approaches available for fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla in the presence of varying hard and soft tissue conditions and to review the clinical outcome of each treatment approach. Materials and Methods: A review of the published data published from 1980 through 2009 was conducted using electronic databases and manual searching to identify the treatment possibilities for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and report their clinical outcomes. The search terms used, in simple or multiple conjunctions, were "fixed rehabilitation," "implants," "edentulous," "fixed dental prosthesis," "implant-supported," and "maxilla." Results: Several treatment modalities were identified for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla, with and without bone augmentation procedures. Regular, tilted, and zygoma implants were identified for treatment modalities that do not require bone augmentation. Sinus floor elevation with the lateral window technique or Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts was identified as a treatment possibility that required bone augmentation procedures. The database initially yielded 230 titles. Of the 230 studies, 42 were finally selected. Although all studies reported the survival rates of the implants, only 20 provided information about the prosthetic outcome. Because of the limited number of studies, at least for the specific treatment modalities, and the heterogeneity in the design of the different studies identified, it was not possible to perform a statistical analysis of the data. Except for regular implants placed in native bone, no sufficient long-term clinical studies were found for the other procedures. Conclusions: Except for regular implants placed in nonaugmented native bone, the published data provide insufficient evidence about the outcome of other procedures. Until long-term data are available, such procedures should not be considered reliable treatment modalities.
C02 01  X    @0 002B10C02
C02 02  X    @0 002B26O
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Edentation @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Edentulousness @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Edentación @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie @5 04
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Surgery @5 04
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía @5 04
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Réadaptation @5 07
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Rehabilitation(human) @5 07
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Readaptación @5 07
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Rééducation @5 08
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Reeducation @5 08
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Reeducación @5 08
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Maxillaire @5 09
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Maxillary @5 09
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Maxilar @5 09
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Pronostic @5 13
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Prognosis @5 13
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Pronóstico @5 13
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Stomatologie @5 14
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Stomatology @5 14
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Estomatología @5 14
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Traitement @5 30
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Treatment @5 30
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Tratamiento @5 30
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Pathologie dentaire @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Dental disease @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Diente patología @5 37
N21       @1 025
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 10-0037300 INIST
ET : Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome
AU : ATT (Wael); BERNHART (Jasmin); STRUB (Jörg Rudolf); BLOCK (Michael S.)
AF : Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry/Freiburg/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 67; No. 11 SUP3; Pp. 60-73; Bibl. 79 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Purpose: The aim of the present report was to describe the different treatment approaches available for fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla in the presence of varying hard and soft tissue conditions and to review the clinical outcome of each treatment approach. Materials and Methods: A review of the published data published from 1980 through 2009 was conducted using electronic databases and manual searching to identify the treatment possibilities for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and report their clinical outcomes. The search terms used, in simple or multiple conjunctions, were "fixed rehabilitation," "implants," "edentulous," "fixed dental prosthesis," "implant-supported," and "maxilla." Results: Several treatment modalities were identified for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla, with and without bone augmentation procedures. Regular, tilted, and zygoma implants were identified for treatment modalities that do not require bone augmentation. Sinus floor elevation with the lateral window technique or Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts was identified as a treatment possibility that required bone augmentation procedures. The database initially yielded 230 titles. Of the 230 studies, 42 were finally selected. Although all studies reported the survival rates of the implants, only 20 provided information about the prosthetic outcome. Because of the limited number of studies, at least for the specific treatment modalities, and the heterogeneity in the design of the different studies identified, it was not possible to perform a statistical analysis of the data. Except for regular implants placed in native bone, no sufficient long-term clinical studies were found for the other procedures. Conclusions: Except for regular implants placed in nonaugmented native bone, the published data provide insufficient evidence about the outcome of other procedures. Until long-term data are available, such procedures should not be considered reliable treatment modalities.
CC : 002B10C02; 002B26O
FD : Edentation; Chirurgie; Réadaptation; Rééducation; Maxillaire; Pronostic; Stomatologie; Traitement
FG : Pathologie dentaire
ED : Edentulousness; Surgery; Rehabilitation(human); Reeducation; Maxillary; Prognosis; Stomatology; Treatment
EG : Dental disease
SD : Edentación; Cirugía; Readaptación; Reeducación; Maxilar; Pronóstico; Estomatología; Tratamiento
LO : INIST-3005.354000170162300070
ID : 10-0037300

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:10-0037300

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Att, Wael" sort="Att, Wael" uniqKey="Att W" first="Wael" last="Att">Wael Att</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry</s1>
<s2>Freiburg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bernhart, Jasmin" sort="Bernhart, Jasmin" uniqKey="Bernhart J" first="Jasmin" last="Bernhart">Jasmin Bernhart</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry</s1>
<s2>Freiburg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Strub, Jorg Rudolf" sort="Strub, Jorg Rudolf" uniqKey="Strub J" first="Jörg Rudolf" last="Strub">Jörg Rudolf Strub</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry</s1>
<s2>Freiburg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0037300</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0037300 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0037300</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000241</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Att, Wael" sort="Att, Wael" uniqKey="Att W" first="Wael" last="Att">Wael Att</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry</s1>
<s2>Freiburg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bernhart, Jasmin" sort="Bernhart, Jasmin" uniqKey="Bernhart J" first="Jasmin" last="Bernhart">Jasmin Bernhart</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry</s1>
<s2>Freiburg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Strub, Jorg Rudolf" sort="Strub, Jorg Rudolf" uniqKey="Strub J" first="Jörg Rudolf" last="Strub">Jörg Rudolf Strub</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry</s1>
<s2>Freiburg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. oral maxillofac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Reeducation</term>
<term>Rehabilitation(human)</term>
<term>Stomatology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Edentation</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Réadaptation</term>
<term>Rééducation</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Pronostic</term>
<term>Stomatologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: The aim of the present report was to describe the different treatment approaches available for fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla in the presence of varying hard and soft tissue conditions and to review the clinical outcome of each treatment approach. Materials and Methods: A review of the published data published from 1980 through 2009 was conducted using electronic databases and manual searching to identify the treatment possibilities for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and report their clinical outcomes. The search terms used, in simple or multiple conjunctions, were "fixed rehabilitation," "implants," "edentulous," "fixed dental prosthesis," "implant-supported," and "maxilla." Results: Several treatment modalities were identified for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla, with and without bone augmentation procedures. Regular, tilted, and zygoma implants were identified for treatment modalities that do not require bone augmentation. Sinus floor elevation with the lateral window technique or Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts was identified as a treatment possibility that required bone augmentation procedures. The database initially yielded 230 titles. Of the 230 studies, 42 were finally selected. Although all studies reported the survival rates of the implants, only 20 provided information about the prosthetic outcome. Because of the limited number of studies, at least for the specific treatment modalities, and the heterogeneity in the design of the different studies identified, it was not possible to perform a statistical analysis of the data. Except for regular implants placed in native bone, no sufficient long-term clinical studies were found for the other procedures. Conclusions: Except for regular implants placed in nonaugmented native bone, the published data provide insufficient evidence about the outcome of other procedures. Until long-term data are available, such procedures should not be considered reliable treatment modalities.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0278-2391</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>JOMSDA</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. oral maxillofac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>67</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>11</s2>
<s3>SUP3</s3>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>INTERDISCIPLINARY ADVANCES IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>ATT (Wael)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>BERNHART (Jasmin)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>STRUB (Jörg Rudolf)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>BLOCK (Michael S.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry</s1>
<s2>Freiburg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>60-73</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3005</s2>
<s5>354000170162300070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>79 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>10-0037300</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Purpose: The aim of the present report was to describe the different treatment approaches available for fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla in the presence of varying hard and soft tissue conditions and to review the clinical outcome of each treatment approach. Materials and Methods: A review of the published data published from 1980 through 2009 was conducted using electronic databases and manual searching to identify the treatment possibilities for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and report their clinical outcomes. The search terms used, in simple or multiple conjunctions, were "fixed rehabilitation," "implants," "edentulous," "fixed dental prosthesis," "implant-supported," and "maxilla." Results: Several treatment modalities were identified for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla, with and without bone augmentation procedures. Regular, tilted, and zygoma implants were identified for treatment modalities that do not require bone augmentation. Sinus floor elevation with the lateral window technique or Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts was identified as a treatment possibility that required bone augmentation procedures. The database initially yielded 230 titles. Of the 230 studies, 42 were finally selected. Although all studies reported the survival rates of the implants, only 20 provided information about the prosthetic outcome. Because of the limited number of studies, at least for the specific treatment modalities, and the heterogeneity in the design of the different studies identified, it was not possible to perform a statistical analysis of the data. Except for regular implants placed in native bone, no sufficient long-term clinical studies were found for the other procedures. Conclusions: Except for regular implants placed in nonaugmented native bone, the published data provide insufficient evidence about the outcome of other procedures. Until long-term data are available, such procedures should not be considered reliable treatment modalities.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002B26O</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Réadaptation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Rehabilitation(human)</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Readaptación</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Rééducation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Reeducation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Reeducación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Maxillaire</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Maxillary</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Maxilar</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pronostic</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Prognosis</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Pronóstico</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>025</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 10-0037300 INIST</NO>
<ET>Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome</ET>
<AU>ATT (Wael); BERNHART (Jasmin); STRUB (Jörg Rudolf); BLOCK (Michael S.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Prosthodontics, Albert-Ludwigs University School of Dentistry/Freiburg/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery; ISSN 0278-2391; Coden JOMSDA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 67; No. 11 SUP3; Pp. 60-73; Bibl. 79 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: The aim of the present report was to describe the different treatment approaches available for fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla in the presence of varying hard and soft tissue conditions and to review the clinical outcome of each treatment approach. Materials and Methods: A review of the published data published from 1980 through 2009 was conducted using electronic databases and manual searching to identify the treatment possibilities for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and report their clinical outcomes. The search terms used, in simple or multiple conjunctions, were "fixed rehabilitation," "implants," "edentulous," "fixed dental prosthesis," "implant-supported," and "maxilla." Results: Several treatment modalities were identified for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla, with and without bone augmentation procedures. Regular, tilted, and zygoma implants were identified for treatment modalities that do not require bone augmentation. Sinus floor elevation with the lateral window technique or Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts was identified as a treatment possibility that required bone augmentation procedures. The database initially yielded 230 titles. Of the 230 studies, 42 were finally selected. Although all studies reported the survival rates of the implants, only 20 provided information about the prosthetic outcome. Because of the limited number of studies, at least for the specific treatment modalities, and the heterogeneity in the design of the different studies identified, it was not possible to perform a statistical analysis of the data. Except for regular implants placed in native bone, no sufficient long-term clinical studies were found for the other procedures. Conclusions: Except for regular implants placed in nonaugmented native bone, the published data provide insufficient evidence about the outcome of other procedures. Until long-term data are available, such procedures should not be considered reliable treatment modalities.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02; 002B26O</CC>
<FD>Edentation; Chirurgie; Réadaptation; Rééducation; Maxillaire; Pronostic; Stomatologie; Traitement</FD>
<FG>Pathologie dentaire</FG>
<ED>Edentulousness; Surgery; Rehabilitation(human); Reeducation; Maxillary; Prognosis; Stomatology; Treatment</ED>
<EG>Dental disease</EG>
<SD>Edentación; Cirugía; Readaptación; Reeducación; Maxilar; Pronóstico; Estomatología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-3005.354000170162300070</LO>
<ID>10-0037300</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000241 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000241 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:10-0037300
   |texte=   Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Possibilities and Clinical Outcome
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022