A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year
Identifieur interne : 000240 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000239; suivant : 000241A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year
Auteurs : Wim Sloe ; Gerry M. Raghoebar ; Arjan Vissink ; James J. Huddleston Slater ; Henny J. A. MeijerSource :
- Journal of clinical periodontology [ 0303-6979 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. Material and methods: MEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles. Results: Out of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year. Conclusion: In all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 10-0041705 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year |
AU : | SLOE (Wim); RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.); VISSINK (Arjan); SLATER (James J. Huddleston); MEIJER (Henny J. A.) |
AF : | Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Oral Health Care and Clinical Epidemiology, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (4 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of clinical periodontology; ISSN 0303-6979; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2010; Vol. 37; No. 1; Pp. 98-110; Bibl. 5 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Aim: The aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. Material and methods: MEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles. Results: Out of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year. Conclusion: In all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful. |
CC : | 002B10C02 |
FD : | Edentation; Article synthèse; Revue bibliographique; Implant; Dent; Maxillaire; Pronostic; Survie; Dentisterie |
FG : | Pathologie dentaire; Stomatologie |
ED : | Edentulousness; Review; Bibliographic review; Implant; Tooth; Maxillary; Prognosis; Survival; Dentistry |
EG : | Dental disease; Stomatology |
SD : | Edentación; Artículo síntesis; Revista bibliográfica; Implante; Diente; Maxilar; Pronóstico; Sobrevivencia; Odontología |
LO : | INIST-16273.354000171536450120 |
ID : | 10-0041705 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:10-0041705Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sloe, Wim" sort="Sloe, Wim" uniqKey="Sloe W" first="Wim" last="Sloe">Wim Sloe</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Slater, James J Huddleston" sort="Slater, James J Huddleston" uniqKey="Slater J" first="James J. Huddleston" last="Slater">James J. Huddleston Slater</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Oral Health Care and Clinical Epidemiology, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0041705</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0041705 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0041705</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000240</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sloe, Wim" sort="Sloe, Wim" uniqKey="Sloe W" first="Wim" last="Sloe">Wim Sloe</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M." last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Slater, James J Huddleston" sort="Slater, James J Huddleston" uniqKey="Slater J" first="James J. Huddleston" last="Slater">James J. Huddleston Slater</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Oral Health Care and Clinical Epidemiology, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J. A." last="Meijer">Henny J. A. Meijer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of clinical periodontology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. clin. periodontol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0303-6979</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bibliographic review</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Edentulousness</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Prognosis</term>
<term>Review</term>
<term>Survival</term>
<term>Tooth</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Edentation</term>
<term>Article synthèse</term>
<term>Revue bibliographique</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Maxillaire</term>
<term>Pronostic</term>
<term>Survie</term>
<term>Dentisterie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Aim: The aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. Material and methods: MEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles. Results: Out of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year. Conclusion: In all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0303-6979</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. clin. periodontol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>37</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SLOE (Wim)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>VISSINK (Arjan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SLATER (James J. Huddleston)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>MEIJER (Henny J. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Oral Health Care and Clinical Epidemiology, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen</s1>
<s2>Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>98-110</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>16273</s2>
<s5>354000171536450120</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>5 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0041705</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of clinical periodontology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Aim: The aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. Material and methods: MEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles. Results: Out of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year. Conclusion: In all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B10C02</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Edentation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Edentulousness</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edentación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Article synthèse</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Review</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Artículo síntesis</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Revue bibliographique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bibliographic review</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Revista bibliográfica</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dent</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tooth</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maxillaire</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Maxillary</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Maxilar</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pronostic</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Prognosis</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pronóstico</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Survie</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Survival</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sobrevivencia</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dentisterie</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dentistry</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Odontología</s0>
<s5>30</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie dentaire</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Dental disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diente patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stomatologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stomatology</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estomatología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>025</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 10-0041705 INIST</NO>
<ET>A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year</ET>
<AU>SLOE (Wim); RAGHOEBAR (Gerry M.); VISSINK (Arjan); SLATER (James J. Huddleston); MEIJER (Henny J. A.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Department of Oral Health Care and Clinical Epidemiology, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen/Groningen/Pays-Bas (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of clinical periodontology; ISSN 0303-6979; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2010; Vol. 37; No. 1; Pp. 98-110; Bibl. 5 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Aim: The aim of the present systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures was to assess the survival of implants, survival of maxillary overdentures and the condition of surrounding hard and soft tissues after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. Material and methods: MEDLINE (1950-August 2009), EMBASE (1966-August 2009) and CENTRAL (1800-August 2009) were searched to identify eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the articles. Results: Out of 147 primarily selected articles, 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis showed an implant survival rate (SR) of 98.2% per year in case of six implants and a bar anchorage. In case of four implants and a bar anchorage, the implant SR was 96.3% per person. In case of four implants and a ball anchorage, the implant SR was 95.2% per year. Conclusion: In all three treatment options, the SR of the implants is more than 95%. The studies included reveal that a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, which are connected with a bar, is the most successful treatment regarding survival of both the implants and overdenture. Second in line is the treatment option with four implants and a bar. The treatment option with four or less implants and a ball attachment system is the least successful.</EA>
<CC>002B10C02</CC>
<FD>Edentation; Article synthèse; Revue bibliographique; Implant; Dent; Maxillaire; Pronostic; Survie; Dentisterie</FD>
<FG>Pathologie dentaire; Stomatologie</FG>
<ED>Edentulousness; Review; Bibliographic review; Implant; Tooth; Maxillary; Prognosis; Survival; Dentistry</ED>
<EG>Dental disease; Stomatology</EG>
<SD>Edentación; Artículo síntesis; Revista bibliográfica; Implante; Diente; Maxilar; Pronóstico; Sobrevivencia; Odontología</SD>
<LO>INIST-16273.354000171536450120</LO>
<ID>10-0041705</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000240 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000240 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:10-0041705 |texte= A systematic review of implant- supported maxillaryoverdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |