A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Identifieur interne : 009206 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 009205; suivant : 009207A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Auteurs : M S Reddy [États-Unis] ; T. Mayfield-Donahoo ; F J Vanderven ; M K JeffcoatSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1994.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Amélioration d'image radiographique, Analyse de variance, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Humains, Implants dentaires, Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Radiographie dentaire (), Radiographie panoramique, Reproductibilité des résultats, Tomodensitométrie.
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Mandibule, Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- Amélioration d'image radiographique, Analyse de variance, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Humains, Implants dentaires, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Radiographie dentaire, Radiographie panoramique, Reproductibilité des résultats, Tomodensitométrie.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Patient Care Planning, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiography, Dental (methods), Radiography, Panoramic, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Radiography, Dental.
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiography, Panoramic, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Abstract
This study evaluated the advantages of computed tomography (CT) in comparison to routine panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. An in vitro validation study was performed to assess the accuracy of CT and panoramic radiography film images for measurement of anatomic structures and distances between anatomic structures. After correcting by a standard 25% magnification on the panoramic images, a significant difference in measurements was found between the CT and panoramic radiography images. Ten subjects requiring implants in compromised ridges were treatment planned with either CT and panoramic radiographs or panoramic radiographs alone. The ideal implant length was determined at surgery with direct digital radiography. The dentists were significantly more confident using CT and panoramic images than panoramic radiographs alone. Implant length treatment planned with panoramic radiography alone underestimated length significantly compared with the implant length determined to be ideal during surgery, whereas treatment planning with CT and panoramic radiography demonstrated no significant difference. The data indicate the CT may be of value in treatment planning for dental implants, especially when gaining maximum length is of critical importance.
PubMed: 7640337
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004348
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004348
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :004348
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :009206
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:7640337Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Reddy, M S" sort="Reddy, M S" uniqKey="Reddy M" first="M S" last="Reddy">M S Reddy</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Periodontics, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Birmingham 35294-0007</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mayfield Donahoo, T" sort="Mayfield Donahoo, T" uniqKey="Mayfield Donahoo T" first="T" last="Mayfield-Donahoo">T. Mayfield-Donahoo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vanderven, F J" sort="Vanderven, F J" uniqKey="Vanderven F" first="F J" last="Vanderven">F J Vanderven</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jeffcoat, M K" sort="Jeffcoat, M K" uniqKey="Jeffcoat M" first="M K" last="Jeffcoat">M K Jeffcoat</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:7640337</idno><idno type="pmid">7640337</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004348</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004348</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">004348</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">004348</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">004348</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">004348</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">009206</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">009206</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Reddy, M S" sort="Reddy, M S" uniqKey="Reddy M" first="M S" last="Reddy">M S Reddy</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Periodontics, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Birmingham 35294-0007</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mayfield Donahoo, T" sort="Mayfield Donahoo, T" uniqKey="Mayfield Donahoo T" first="T" last="Mayfield-Donahoo">T. Mayfield-Donahoo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vanderven, F J" sort="Vanderven, F J" uniqKey="Vanderven F" first="F J" last="Vanderven">F J Vanderven</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jeffcoat, M K" sort="Jeffcoat, M K" uniqKey="Jeffcoat M" first="M K" last="Jeffcoat">M K Jeffcoat</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="1994" type="published">1994</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement</term><term>Radiography, Dental (methods)</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Amélioration d'image radiographique</term><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Radiographie dentaire ()</term><term>Radiographie panoramique</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Tomodensitométrie</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Radiography, Dental</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Amélioration d'image radiographique</term><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Radiographie dentaire</term><term>Radiographie panoramique</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Tomodensitométrie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study evaluated the advantages of computed tomography (CT) in comparison to routine panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. An in vitro validation study was performed to assess the accuracy of CT and panoramic radiography film images for measurement of anatomic structures and distances between anatomic structures. After correcting by a standard 25% magnification on the panoramic images, a significant difference in measurements was found between the CT and panoramic radiography images. Ten subjects requiring implants in compromised ridges were treatment planned with either CT and panoramic radiographs or panoramic radiographs alone. The ideal implant length was determined at surgery with direct digital radiography. The dentists were significantly more confident using CT and panoramic images than panoramic radiographs alone. Implant length treatment planned with panoramic radiography alone underestimated length significantly compared with the implant length determined to be ideal during surgery, whereas treatment planning with CT and panoramic radiography demonstrated no significant difference. The data indicate the CT may be of value in treatment planning for dental implants, especially when gaining maximum length is of critical importance.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 009206 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 009206 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:7640337
|texte= A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:7640337" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |