A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Identifieur interne : 004348 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 004347; suivant : 004349A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Auteurs : M S Reddy ; T. Mayfield-Donahoo ; F J Vanderven ; M K JeffcoatSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1994.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Patient Care Planning, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiography, Dental (methods), Radiography, Panoramic, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Radiography, Dental.
- Analysis of Variance, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Radiography, Panoramic, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Abstract
This study evaluated the advantages of computed tomography (CT) in comparison to routine panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. An in vitro validation study was performed to assess the accuracy of CT and panoramic radiography film images for measurement of anatomic structures and distances between anatomic structures. After correcting by a standard 25% magnification on the panoramic images, a significant difference in measurements was found between the CT and panoramic radiography images. Ten subjects requiring implants in compromised ridges were treatment planned with either CT and panoramic radiographs or panoramic radiographs alone. The ideal implant length was determined at surgery with direct digital radiography. The dentists were significantly more confident using CT and panoramic images than panoramic radiographs alone. Implant length treatment planned with panoramic radiography alone underestimated length significantly compared with the implant length determined to be ideal during surgery, whereas treatment planning with CT and panoramic radiography demonstrated no significant difference. The data indicate the CT may be of value in treatment planning for dental implants, especially when gaining maximum length is of critical importance.
PubMed: 7640337
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:7640337Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Reddy, M S" sort="Reddy, M S" uniqKey="Reddy M" first="M S" last="Reddy">M S Reddy</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mayfield Donahoo, T" sort="Mayfield Donahoo, T" uniqKey="Mayfield Donahoo T" first="T" last="Mayfield-Donahoo">T. Mayfield-Donahoo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vanderven, F J" sort="Vanderven, F J" uniqKey="Vanderven F" first="F J" last="Vanderven">F J Vanderven</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jeffcoat, M K" sort="Jeffcoat, M K" uniqKey="Jeffcoat M" first="M K" last="Jeffcoat">M K Jeffcoat</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:7640337</idno><idno type="pmid">7640337</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004348</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004348</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Reddy, M S" sort="Reddy, M S" uniqKey="Reddy M" first="M S" last="Reddy">M S Reddy</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mayfield Donahoo, T" sort="Mayfield Donahoo, T" uniqKey="Mayfield Donahoo T" first="T" last="Mayfield-Donahoo">T. Mayfield-Donahoo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vanderven, F J" sort="Vanderven, F J" uniqKey="Vanderven F" first="F J" last="Vanderven">F J Vanderven</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jeffcoat, M K" sort="Jeffcoat, M K" uniqKey="Jeffcoat M" first="M K" last="Jeffcoat">M K Jeffcoat</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="1994" type="published">1994</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement</term><term>Radiography, Dental (methods)</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Radiography, Dental</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study evaluated the advantages of computed tomography (CT) in comparison to routine panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. An in vitro validation study was performed to assess the accuracy of CT and panoramic radiography film images for measurement of anatomic structures and distances between anatomic structures. After correcting by a standard 25% magnification on the panoramic images, a significant difference in measurements was found between the CT and panoramic radiography images. Ten subjects requiring implants in compromised ridges were treatment planned with either CT and panoramic radiographs or panoramic radiographs alone. The ideal implant length was determined at surgery with direct digital radiography. The dentists were significantly more confident using CT and panoramic images than panoramic radiographs alone. Implant length treatment planned with panoramic radiography alone underestimated length significantly compared with the implant length determined to be ideal during surgery, whereas treatment planning with CT and panoramic radiography demonstrated no significant difference. The data indicate the CT may be of value in treatment planning for dental implants, especially when gaining maximum length is of critical importance.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">7640337</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1995</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>5</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>1994</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>229-38</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>This study evaluated the advantages of computed tomography (CT) in comparison to routine panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. An in vitro validation study was performed to assess the accuracy of CT and panoramic radiography film images for measurement of anatomic structures and distances between anatomic structures. After correcting by a standard 25% magnification on the panoramic images, a significant difference in measurements was found between the CT and panoramic radiography images. Ten subjects requiring implants in compromised ridges were treatment planned with either CT and panoramic radiographs or panoramic radiographs alone. The ideal implant length was determined at surgery with direct digital radiography. The dentists were significantly more confident using CT and panoramic images than panoramic radiographs alone. Implant length treatment planned with panoramic radiography alone underestimated length significantly compared with the implant length determined to be ideal during surgery, whereas treatment planning with CT and panoramic radiography demonstrated no significant difference. The data indicate the CT may be of value in treatment planning for dental implants, especially when gaining maximum length is of critical importance.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reddy</LastName><ForeName>M S</ForeName><Initials>MS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontics, University of Alabama, School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mayfield-Donahoo</LastName><ForeName>T</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vanderven</LastName><ForeName>F J</ForeName><Initials>FJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jeffcoat</LastName><ForeName>M K</ForeName><Initials>MK</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011856" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiographic Image Enhancement</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011861" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Dental</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011862" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Panoramic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1994</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1994</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1994</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7640337</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004348 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004348 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:7640337
|texte= A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:7640337" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |