Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part III. Clinical evaluation

Identifieur interne : 00F148 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 00F147; suivant : 00F149

Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part III. Clinical evaluation

Auteurs : Robert Cantor [États-Unis] ; Thomas A. Curtis [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:A4F51ED473228AE0A639208D949F6E33D7E1CF87

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: Thirty edentulous mandibulectomy patients participated in a clinical study to compare functionally developed prosthetic procedures with the more traditional techniques. The 30 patients were classified as to type of mandibular defect and were given both types of prostheses on a controlled basis. Anatomic and psychologic data, the adjustment problems, and denture preferences were recorded.Twenty-two patients could successfully use lower dentures. Fifteen (50 per cent) of the test patients preferred the swallowing” prosthesis. Three (10 per cent) of the test patients preferred the conventionally constructed lower dentures. Six of the seven Class III mandibulectomy patients (the most difficult to treat prosthetically) were unable to use either denture. The remaining patients could use either lower denture and had no significant preference.This data is presented in the hope that these new prosthetic techniques will be accepted as possible alternatives when treating certain types of edentulous mandibulectomy patients and can, thereby, be studied, developed, and evaluated more extensively.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(71)90132-6

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:A4F51ED473228AE0A639208D949F6E33D7E1CF87

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part III. Clinical evaluation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cantor, Robert" sort="Cantor, Robert" uniqKey="Cantor R" first="Robert" last="Cantor">Robert Cantor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Curtis, Thomas A" sort="Curtis, Thomas A" uniqKey="Curtis T" first="Thomas A." last="Curtis">Thomas A. Curtis</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A4F51ED473228AE0A639208D949F6E33D7E1CF87</idno>
<date when="1971" year="1971">1971</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(71)90132-6</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A4F51ED473228AE0A639208D949F6E33D7E1CF87/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005260</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005260</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005260</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">006B71</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">006B71</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1971:Cantor R:prosthetic:management:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00F148</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part III. Clinical evaluation</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cantor, Robert" sort="Cantor, Robert" uniqKey="Cantor R" first="Robert" last="Cantor">Robert Cantor</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of California, School of Dentistry, San Francisco</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">San Francisco</settlement>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Curtis, Thomas A" sort="Curtis, Thomas A" uniqKey="Curtis T" first="Thomas A." last="Curtis">Thomas A. Curtis</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of California, School of Dentistry, San Francisco</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">San Francisco</settlement>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1971">1971</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="670">670</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="678">678</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adjustment period</term>
<term>Adjustment plateau</term>
<term>Anatomic</term>
<term>Cantor</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional none</term>
<term>Defect classification</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture experience</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandibulectomy patients</term>
<term>Emotional stability</term>
<term>High medium</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Lower dentures</term>
<term>Lower prosthesis</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibulectomy</term>
<term>Mandibulectomy patients</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Medium medium</term>
<term>Patient expectation</term>
<term>Prosth</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic management</term>
<term>Prosthetic techniques</term>
<term>Psychologic</term>
<term>Resection</term>
<term>Resection denture</term>
<term>Significant preference</term>
<term>Surg</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Surgery surg</term>
<term>Surgery surgery surgery surg</term>
<term>Surgery surgery surgery surgery surgery surg</term>
<term>Test patients</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adjustment period</term>
<term>Adjustment plateau</term>
<term>Anatomic</term>
<term>Cantor</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Conventional denture</term>
<term>Conventional none</term>
<term>Defect classification</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture experience</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous mandibulectomy patients</term>
<term>Emotional stability</term>
<term>High medium</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Lower denture</term>
<term>Lower dentures</term>
<term>Lower prosthesis</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibulectomy</term>
<term>Mandibulectomy patients</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Medium medium</term>
<term>Patient expectation</term>
<term>Prosth</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic management</term>
<term>Prosthetic techniques</term>
<term>Psychologic</term>
<term>Resection</term>
<term>Resection denture</term>
<term>Significant preference</term>
<term>Surg</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Surgery surg</term>
<term>Surgery surgery surgery surg</term>
<term>Surgery surgery surgery surgery surgery surg</term>
<term>Test patients</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Chirurgie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Thirty edentulous mandibulectomy patients participated in a clinical study to compare functionally developed prosthetic procedures with the more traditional techniques. The 30 patients were classified as to type of mandibular defect and were given both types of prostheses on a controlled basis. Anatomic and psychologic data, the adjustment problems, and denture preferences were recorded.Twenty-two patients could successfully use lower dentures. Fifteen (50 per cent) of the test patients preferred the swallowing” prosthesis. Three (10 per cent) of the test patients preferred the conventionally constructed lower dentures. Six of the seven Class III mandibulectomy patients (the most difficult to treat prosthetically) were unable to use either denture. The remaining patients could use either lower denture and had no significant preference.This data is presented in the hope that these new prosthetic techniques will be accepted as possible alternatives when treating certain types of edentulous mandibulectomy patients and can, thereby, be studied, developed, and evaluated more extensively.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00F148 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 00F148 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:A4F51ED473228AE0A639208D949F6E33D7E1CF87
   |texte=   Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part III. Clinical evaluation
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022