Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers
Identifieur interne : 008776 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 008775; suivant : 008777Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers
Auteurs : Finbarr Allen [Hong Kong] ; Anne Mcmillan [Hong Kong]Source :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2002-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Allen mcmillan food selection, Avaient besoin, Baseline, Carrot, Cdg1, Cdg1 subjects, Cdg2, Cdg2 subjects, Clin, Complete dentures, Conventional dentures, Conventional prostheses, Dentistry, Denture, Denture satisfaction, Dietary intake, Edentate, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Food selection, Hard foods, Impl, Implant, Implant prostheses, Implant prosthesis, Implants research allen mcmillan food selection, Lettuce, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular prostheses, Masticatory, Masticatory performance, Maxillary, Maxillary comfort, Mcmillan, Oral impl, Oral prostheses, Oral rehabilitation, Overdentures, Postop, Postoperative, Postoperative scores, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prothe, Soft foods, Sujetos, Sujets, Test foods.
- Teeft :
- Allen mcmillan food selection, Avaient besoin, Baseline, Carrot, Cdg1, Cdg1 subjects, Cdg2, Cdg2 subjects, Clin, Complete dentures, Conventional dentures, Conventional prostheses, Dentistry, Denture, Denture satisfaction, Dietary intake, Edentate, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Food selection, Hard foods, Impl, Implant, Implant prostheses, Implant prosthesis, Implants research allen mcmillan food selection, Lettuce, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular prostheses, Masticatory, Masticatory performance, Maxillary, Maxillary comfort, Mcmillan, Oral impl, Oral prostheses, Oral rehabilitation, Overdentures, Postop, Postoperative, Postoperative scores, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prothe, Soft foods, Sujetos, Sujets, Test foods.
Abstract
Abstract: The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, n = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, n = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 006969
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 006969
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003892
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title>
<author><name sortKey="Allen, Finbarr" sort="Allen, Finbarr" uniqKey="Allen F" first="Finbarr" last="Allen">Finbarr Allen</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mcmillan, Anne" sort="Mcmillan, Anne" uniqKey="Mcmillan A" first="Anne" last="Mcmillan">Anne Mcmillan</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006969</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006969</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006969</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003892</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003892</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2002:Allen F:food:selection:and</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008776</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title>
<author><name sortKey="Allen, Finbarr" sort="Allen, Finbarr" uniqKey="Allen F" first="Finbarr" last="Allen">Finbarr Allen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Hong Kong</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Hong Kong University</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mcmillan, Anne" sort="Mcmillan, Anne" uniqKey="Mcmillan A" first="Anne" last="Mcmillan">Anne Mcmillan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Hong Kong</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Hong Kong University</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="320">320</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="326">326</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2002-06">2002-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Allen mcmillan food selection</term>
<term>Avaient besoin</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Carrot</term>
<term>Cdg1</term>
<term>Cdg1 subjects</term>
<term>Cdg2</term>
<term>Cdg2 subjects</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Conventional prostheses</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Dietary intake</term>
<term>Edentate</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous subjects</term>
<term>Food selection</term>
<term>Hard foods</term>
<term>Impl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant prostheses</term>
<term>Implant prosthesis</term>
<term>Implants research allen mcmillan food selection</term>
<term>Lettuce</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular prostheses</term>
<term>Masticatory</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary comfort</term>
<term>Mcmillan</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral prostheses</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Postop</term>
<term>Postoperative</term>
<term>Postoperative scores</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prothe</term>
<term>Soft foods</term>
<term>Sujetos</term>
<term>Sujets</term>
<term>Test foods</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Allen mcmillan food selection</term>
<term>Avaient besoin</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Carrot</term>
<term>Cdg1</term>
<term>Cdg1 subjects</term>
<term>Cdg2</term>
<term>Cdg2 subjects</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Complete dentures</term>
<term>Conventional dentures</term>
<term>Conventional prostheses</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture satisfaction</term>
<term>Dietary intake</term>
<term>Edentate</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Edentulous subjects</term>
<term>Food selection</term>
<term>Hard foods</term>
<term>Impl</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant prostheses</term>
<term>Implant prosthesis</term>
<term>Implants research allen mcmillan food selection</term>
<term>Lettuce</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular dentures</term>
<term>Mandibular prostheses</term>
<term>Masticatory</term>
<term>Masticatory performance</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Maxillary comfort</term>
<term>Mcmillan</term>
<term>Oral impl</term>
<term>Oral prostheses</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Postop</term>
<term>Postoperative</term>
<term>Postoperative scores</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prothe</term>
<term>Soft foods</term>
<term>Sujetos</term>
<term>Sujets</term>
<term>Test foods</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Abstract: The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, n = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, n = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008776 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 008776 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F |texte= Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |