Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers
Identifieur interne : 006969 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 006968; suivant : 006970Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers
Auteurs : Finbarr Allen ; Anne McmillanSource :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2002-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Allen mcmillan food selection, Avaient besoin, Baseline, Carrot, Cdg1, Cdg1 subjects, Cdg2, Cdg2 subjects, Clin, Complete dentures, Conventional dentures, Conventional prostheses, Dentistry, Denture, Denture satisfaction, Dietary intake, Edentate, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Food selection, Hard foods, Impl, Implant, Implant prostheses, Implant prosthesis, Implants research allen mcmillan food selection, Lettuce, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular prostheses, Masticatory, Masticatory performance, Maxillary, Maxillary comfort, Mcmillan, Oral impl, Oral prostheses, Oral rehabilitation, Overdentures, Postop, Postoperative, Postoperative scores, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prothe, Soft foods, Sujetos, Sujets, Test foods.
- Teeft :
- Allen mcmillan food selection, Avaient besoin, Baseline, Carrot, Cdg1, Cdg1 subjects, Cdg2, Cdg2 subjects, Clin, Complete dentures, Conventional dentures, Conventional prostheses, Dentistry, Denture, Denture satisfaction, Dietary intake, Edentate, Edentulous, Edentulous patients, Edentulous subjects, Food selection, Hard foods, Impl, Implant, Implant prostheses, Implant prosthesis, Implants research allen mcmillan food selection, Lettuce, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular prostheses, Masticatory, Masticatory performance, Maxillary, Maxillary comfort, Mcmillan, Oral impl, Oral prostheses, Oral rehabilitation, Overdentures, Postop, Postoperative, Postoperative scores, Prosthesis, Prosthetic, Prosthetic dentistry, Prothe, Soft foods, Sujetos, Sujets, Test foods.
Abstract
Abstract: The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, n = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, n = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title><author><name sortKey="Allen, Finbarr" sort="Allen, Finbarr" uniqKey="Allen F" first="Finbarr" last="Allen">Finbarr Allen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mcmillan, Anne" sort="Mcmillan, Anne" uniqKey="Mcmillan A" first="Anne" last="Mcmillan">Anne Mcmillan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006969</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006969</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title><author><name sortKey="Allen, Finbarr" sort="Allen, Finbarr" uniqKey="Allen F" first="Finbarr" last="Allen">Finbarr Allen</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mcmillan, Anne" sort="Mcmillan, Anne" uniqKey="Mcmillan A" first="Anne" last="Mcmillan">Anne Mcmillan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="320">320</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="326">326</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-06">2002-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Allen mcmillan food selection</term><term>Avaient besoin</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Carrot</term><term>Cdg1</term><term>Cdg1 subjects</term><term>Cdg2</term><term>Cdg2 subjects</term><term>Clin</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Conventional prostheses</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Dietary intake</term><term>Edentate</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Food selection</term><term>Hard foods</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant prostheses</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implants research allen mcmillan food selection</term><term>Lettuce</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary comfort</term><term>Mcmillan</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral prostheses</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Postop</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative scores</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prothe</term><term>Soft foods</term><term>Sujetos</term><term>Sujets</term><term>Test foods</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Allen mcmillan food selection</term><term>Avaient besoin</term><term>Baseline</term><term>Carrot</term><term>Cdg1</term><term>Cdg1 subjects</term><term>Cdg2</term><term>Cdg2 subjects</term><term>Clin</term><term>Complete dentures</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Conventional prostheses</term><term>Dentistry</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture satisfaction</term><term>Dietary intake</term><term>Edentate</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Edentulous subjects</term><term>Food selection</term><term>Hard foods</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant prostheses</term><term>Implant prosthesis</term><term>Implants research allen mcmillan food selection</term><term>Lettuce</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular prostheses</term><term>Masticatory</term><term>Masticatory performance</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Maxillary comfort</term><term>Mcmillan</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Oral prostheses</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Postop</term><term>Postoperative</term><term>Postoperative scores</term><term>Prosthesis</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Prothe</term><term>Soft foods</term><term>Sujetos</term><term>Sujets</term><term>Test foods</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, n = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, n = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>denture</json:string><json:string>prosthesis</json:string><json:string>cdg1</json:string><json:string>cdg2</json:string><json:string>implant</json:string><json:string>mandibular</json:string><json:string>postoperative</json:string><json:string>lettuce</json:string><json:string>food selection</json:string><json:string>conventional dentures</json:string><json:string>cdg2 subjects</json:string><json:string>cdg1 subjects</json:string><json:string>edentulous patients</json:string><json:string>prothe</json:string><json:string>overdentures</json:string><json:string>mcmillan</json:string><json:string>complete dentures</json:string><json:string>implant prostheses</json:string><json:string>maxillary</json:string><json:string>edentulous</json:string><json:string>sujetos</json:string><json:string>sujets</json:string><json:string>oral impl</json:string><json:string>impl</json:string><json:string>postop</json:string><json:string>prosthetic</json:string><json:string>masticatory</json:string><json:string>edentate</json:string><json:string>hard foods</json:string><json:string>clin</json:string><json:string>carrot</json:string><json:string>implant prosthesis</json:string><json:string>dentistry</json:string><json:string>edentulous subjects</json:string><json:string>mandibular dentures</json:string><json:string>conventional prostheses</json:string><json:string>prosthetic dentistry</json:string><json:string>baseline</json:string><json:string>allen mcmillan food selection</json:string><json:string>mandibular prostheses</json:string><json:string>test foods</json:string><json:string>masticatory performance</json:string><json:string>maxillary comfort</json:string><json:string>denture satisfaction</json:string><json:string>postoperative scores</json:string><json:string>dietary intake</json:string><json:string>oral prostheses</json:string><json:string>implants research allen mcmillan food selection</json:string><json:string>avaient besoin</json:string><json:string>oral rehabilitation</json:string><json:string>soft foods</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Finbarr Allen</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Anne McMillan</name><affiliations><json:string>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>implants</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>food selection</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mastication</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>edentulousness</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>0647</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/WNG-CV6W9MM9-K</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, n = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, n = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>269</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1892</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><score>10</score><pdfWordCount>5063</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>34220</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595 x 794 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title><pmid><json:string>12010164</json:string></pmid><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0905-7161</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1600-0501</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>CLR</json:string></publisherId><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>320</first><last>326</last><total>7</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>2002</json:string></date><geogName><json:string>Postop Median</json:string></geogName><orgName><json:string>National Diet and Nutrition</json:string><json:string>Hong Kong University</json:string><json:string>UK National Diet and Nutrition</json:string><json:string>Hospital Wilton, Cork Ireland Tel</json:string><json:string>Department of Restorative Dentistry University Dental School</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Van Oort</json:string><json:string>Kong Correspondence</json:string><json:string>Finbarr Allen</json:string><json:string>Table</json:string><json:string>Anne McMillan</json:string><json:string>An Implantaten</json:string><json:string>Despite</json:string><json:string>Van Waas</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Lund</json:string><json:string>M.A.</json:string><json:string>Gothenburg</json:string><json:string>Hof</json:string><json:string>Sweden</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>Allen et al. 1999</json:string><json:string>Ranta et al. 1988</json:string><json:string>Gunne & Wall 1985</json:string><json:string>Mericske-Stern & Zarb 1996</json:string><json:string>Faine 1997</json:string><json:string>Wynn 1987</json:string><json:string>Feine et al. 1994</json:string><json:string>Steele et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Kapur & Soman 1964</json:string><json:string>Fontijn-Tekamp et al. 1998</json:string><json:string>Slagter et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Geertman et al. 1996</json:string><json:string>Heath 1982</json:string><json:string>Hogenius et al. 1992</json:string><json:string>Steele et al. (1998)</json:string><json:string>Chauncey (1983)</json:string><json:string>Lundquist et al. 1986</json:string><json:string>Osterberg & Steen 1982</json:string><json:string>Sebring et al. 1995</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/WNG-CV6W9MM9-K</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering, biomedical</json:string><json:string>2 - dentistry, oral surgery & medicine</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - clinical medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - dentistry</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string><json:string>3 - Oral Surgery</json:string></scopus></categories><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x</json:string></doi><id>D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-06"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title><title level="a" type="short">Food selection in edentate patients</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Finbarr</forename><surname>Allen</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations:
Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Anne</forename><surname>McMillan</surname></persName><affiliation>Authors' affiliations:
Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-CV6W9MM9-K</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x</idno><idno type="supplier">0647</idno><idno type="unit">CLR130313</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:CLR.CLR130313.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="pISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/clr.2002.13.issue-3</idno><idno type="product">CLR</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="320">320</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="326">326</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-06"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p><hi rend="bold">Abstract:</hi> The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, <hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, <hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, <hi rend="italic">n</hi> = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr" style="main"><head>Résumé</head><p>La perte des dents naturelles compromet l'efficacité de la mastication, et les patients édentés ont souvent une diète déficiente en fibres et en vitamines. Les prothèses sur implants peuvent aider les prothèses conventionnelles pour améliorer la mastication. Le but de cette étude a été de tester l'hypothèse selon laquelle l'amélioration de la satisfaction des prothèses buccales pouvaient induire une amélioration de la sélection de la nourriture par les patients édentés. Cette étude prospective comprenait trois groupes, c.‐à‐d. 1) des sujets qui avaient besoin et qui ont reçu des implants pour stabiliser des prothèses complètes fixées ou amovibles (IG : n=26); 2) des sujets édentés qui avaient besoin de prothèses sur implants mais qui ont reçu des prothèses conventionnelles (CDG1 : n=22) et des sujets édentés qui avaient besoin et qui ont reçu des prothèses conventionnelles (CDG2: n=35). Les données ont été collectées à l'aide de questionnaires distribués avant et après l'opération. Avant le traitement, tous les sujets ont été interrogés pour savoir s'ils mangeaient une variété de nourriture dure et tendre, afin de cerner le degré de difficulté de mastication de cette nourriture et pour quantifier leur satisfaction en vis‐à‐vis des prothèses complètes supérieures et inférieures. A la suite du traitement les sujets ont à nouveau complété un questionnaire et les données pré‐ et post‐opératoires ont été comparées. Les sujets qui avaient reçu une prothèse sur implants ont décrit une amélioration significative de la mastication de nourriture tant dure que tendre. Les sujets CDG2 avaient également une amélioration, mais les sujets CDG1 déclaraient n'obtenir ni changement ni même détérioration à la suite du traitement. Malgré l'amélioration de la satisfaction du confort et de l'habilitéà mâcher la nourriture, 30–50% des IG et CDG2 évitaient toujours de manger de la nourriture telle que des carottes ou des pommes. En l'absence d'un avis diététique ajusté une diète satisfaisante n'est donc pas impossible à la suite d'une réhabilitation prothétique apparemment réussie.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="de" style="main"><head>Zusammenfassung</head><p>Der Verlust der eigenen Zähne beeinträchtigt die Kaufähigkeit, und zahnlose Patienten nehmen oft eine an Fasern und Vitaminen arme Diät zu sich. An Implantaten fixierte Prothesen ermöglichen es nun aber gewisse Einschränkungen in der Kaufähigkeit mit dem konventionellen Gebiss zu überwinden. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Hypothese zu testen, dass eine Verbesserung der Zufriedenheit mit Zahnprothesen sich in einer veränderten Auswahl der Nahrungsmittel eines zahnlosen Patienten zeigt. Diese Langzeitstudie schloss drei Patientengruppen ein, nähmlich 1) Personen, die zur Stabilisierung von festsitzenden oder abnehmbaren Prothesen Implantate wünschten und auch erhielten (IG, n=26); 2) zahnlose Personen, die eigentlich implantatgetragene Prothesen wünschten, aber konventionelle Gebisse erhielten (CDG1, n=22), und; 3) Personen, die konventionelle Gebisse wünschten und auch erhielten (CDG2, n=35). Die Angaben sammelte man vor und nach der Therapie mit ausgetesteten Fragekatalogen. Vor Behandlungsbeginn wurden alle Personen gebeten, verschiedene harte und weiche Nahrungsmitteln zu essen, um einerseits Schwierigkeiten festzustellen, diese Nahrungsmittel zu zerkauen, und um andererseits ihre Zufriedenheit mit den aktuellen Ober‐ und Unterkieferprothesen einzuordnen. Nach Abschluss der Behandlung füllten die Versuchspersonen den Fragekatalog nochmals aus, und anschliessend wurden die Ergebnisse vor und nach der Behandlung verglichen. Personen, die eine implantatgetragene Prothese erhalten hatten, berichteten über eine signifikante Verbesserung der Kaufähigkeit von harten und weichen Nahrungsmitteln. Die CDG2‐Gruppe berichtete auch über eine Verbesserung, die CDG1‐Gruppe jedoch konnte keine Veränderungen feststellen, ja musste teils sogar über eine Verschlechterung nach der Behandlung berichten. Trotz erwiesener grösserer Zufriedenheit mit Kaukomfort und ‐fähigkeit, vermieden es 30–50% aller Personen der Gruppen IG und CDG2 weiterhin, Nahrungsmittel wie Karotten und Äpfel zu essen. Dies lässt vermuten, dass es ohne massgeschneiderte Diätanweisungen nach erfolgreicher prothetischer Rehabilitation nicht unbedingt zu einer zufriedenstellenden Umstellung des Speisezettels kommt.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="es" style="main"><head>Resumen</head><p>La pérdida de los dientes naturales compromete la eficiencia masticatoria, y los pacientes edéntulos tienen con frecuencia una dieta que es deficiente en fibra y vitaminas. Las prótesis retenidas sobre implantes ofrecen la posibilidad de superar algunas de las limitaciones de las dentaduras convencionales en términos de eficiencia masticatoria. La intención con prótesis orales resultaría en una mejora en la selección de comida en el paciente edétulo. Este estudio prospectivo implicó tres grupos, es decir, 1) sujetos que solicitaron y recibieron implantes para estabilizar una prótesis completa fija o removible (IG, n=26); 2) sujetos edéntulos que solicitaron prótesis implantosoportadas y recibieron dentaduras convencionales (CDG1, n=22), y; 3) pacientes edéntulos que solicitaron y recibieron dentaduras convencionales (CDG2, n=35). Los datos se recogieron usando cuestionarios convalidados pre y postoperatoriamente. Previo al tratamiento, se les preguntó a todos los sujetos si comían una variedad de comida dura o blanda, para indicar el grado de dificultat al masticar esas comidas y valorar su satisfacción con aspectos de sus dentaduras completas maxilares o mandibulares. Tras la terminación del tratamiento, los sujetos completaron los cuestionarios otra vez y se compararon los datos pre y postoperatorios. Los sujetos que recibieron una prótesis implantosoportada informaron sobre mejoras significativas en la masticación de comidas duras y blandas. Los sujetos CDG2 también informaron sobre mejoras, pero los sujetos CDG1 informaron que no se había producido ningún cambio o incuso que hubo deterioro tras el tratamiento. A pesar de informar sobre una mejora en la satisfacción con confort y habilidad para masticar comida, 30–50% de los sujetos IG y CDG2 aun evitaban comer alimentos tales como zanahorias y manzanas. Esto sugiere que, en ausencia de un asesoramiento dietético a medida, una dieta satisfactoria no es inevitable tras una aparentemente exitosa rehabilitación prostética.</p><p>
<graphic url="image_n/CLR_130313_f1.gif" rend="inline image"></graphic>
</p></abstract><textClass><keywords xml:lang="en"><term xml:id="k1">implants</term><term xml:id="k2">food selection</term><term xml:id="k3">mastication</term><term xml:id="k4">edentulousness </term></keywords><keywords rend="tocHeading1"><term>Original articles</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</doi><issn type="print">0905-7161</issn><issn type="electronic">1600-0501</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="CLR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/clr.2002.13.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="13">13</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-06">June 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0032000" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x</doi><idGroup><id type="supplier" value="0647"></id><id type="unit" value="CLR130313"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="7"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-05-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-05-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.4 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:4.0.1" date="2014-03-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-17"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="320">320</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="326">326</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
<i>Dr Finbarr Allen</i>
Department of Restorative Dentistry
University Dental School & Hospital
Wilton, Cork
Ireland
Tel: + 353 21 490 1186
Fax: + 353 21 434 5737
e‐mail: <email>finbarrallen@hotmail.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:CLR.CLR130313.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Accepted 30 May 2001</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="6"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="19"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="5241"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="15"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title><title type="shortAuthors">Allen & McMillan</title><title type="short">Food selection in edentate patients</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Finbarr</givenNames><familyName>Allen</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Anne</givenNames><familyName>McMillan</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1"><unparsedAffiliation><b>Authors' affiliations:</b>
<i>Finbarr Allen</i>, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
<i>Anne McMillan</i>, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">implants</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">food selection</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">mastication</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">edentulousness </keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Abstract:</b> The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, <i>n</i> = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, <i>n</i> = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, <i>n</i> = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">Résumé</title><p>La perte des dents naturelles compromet l'efficacité de la mastication, et les patients édentés ont souvent une diète déficiente en fibres et en vitamines. Les prothèses sur implants peuvent aider les prothèses conventionnelles pour améliorer la mastication. Le but de cette étude a été de tester l'hypothèse selon laquelle l'amélioration de la satisfaction des prothèses buccales pouvaient induire une amélioration de la sélection de la nourriture par les patients édentés. Cette étude prospective comprenait trois groupes, c.‐à‐d. 1) des sujets qui avaient besoin et qui ont reçu des implants pour stabiliser des prothèses complètes fixées ou amovibles (IG : n=26); 2) des sujets édentés qui avaient besoin de prothèses sur implants mais qui ont reçu des prothèses conventionnelles (CDG1 : n=22) et des sujets édentés qui avaient besoin et qui ont reçu des prothèses conventionnelles (CDG2: n=35). Les données ont été collectées à l'aide de questionnaires distribués avant et après l'opération. Avant le traitement, tous les sujets ont été interrogés pour savoir s'ils mangeaient une variété de nourriture dure et tendre, afin de cerner le degré de difficulté de mastication de cette nourriture et pour quantifier leur satisfaction en vis‐à‐vis des prothèses complètes supérieures et inférieures. A la suite du traitement les sujets ont à nouveau complété un questionnaire et les données pré‐ et post‐opératoires ont été comparées. Les sujets qui avaient reçu une prothèse sur implants ont décrit une amélioration significative de la mastication de nourriture tant dure que tendre. Les sujets CDG2 avaient également une amélioration, mais les sujets CDG1 déclaraient n'obtenir ni changement ni même détérioration à la suite du traitement. Malgré l'amélioration de la satisfaction du confort et de l'habilitéà mâcher la nourriture, 30–50% des IG et CDG2 évitaient toujours de manger de la nourriture telle que des carottes ou des pommes. En l'absence d'un avis diététique ajusté une diète satisfaisante n'est donc pas impossible à la suite d'une réhabilitation prothétique apparemment réussie.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="de"><title type="main">Zusammenfassung</title><p>Der Verlust der eigenen Zähne beeinträchtigt die Kaufähigkeit, und zahnlose Patienten nehmen oft eine an Fasern und Vitaminen arme Diät zu sich. An Implantaten fixierte Prothesen ermöglichen es nun aber gewisse Einschränkungen in der Kaufähigkeit mit dem konventionellen Gebiss zu überwinden. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Hypothese zu testen, dass eine Verbesserung der Zufriedenheit mit Zahnprothesen sich in einer veränderten Auswahl der Nahrungsmittel eines zahnlosen Patienten zeigt. Diese Langzeitstudie schloss drei Patientengruppen ein, nähmlich 1) Personen, die zur Stabilisierung von festsitzenden oder abnehmbaren Prothesen Implantate wünschten und auch erhielten (IG, n=26); 2) zahnlose Personen, die eigentlich implantatgetragene Prothesen wünschten, aber konventionelle Gebisse erhielten (CDG1, n=22), und; 3) Personen, die konventionelle Gebisse wünschten und auch erhielten (CDG2, n=35). Die Angaben sammelte man vor und nach der Therapie mit ausgetesteten Fragekatalogen. Vor Behandlungsbeginn wurden alle Personen gebeten, verschiedene harte und weiche Nahrungsmitteln zu essen, um einerseits Schwierigkeiten festzustellen, diese Nahrungsmittel zu zerkauen, und um andererseits ihre Zufriedenheit mit den aktuellen Ober‐ und Unterkieferprothesen einzuordnen. Nach Abschluss der Behandlung füllten die Versuchspersonen den Fragekatalog nochmals aus, und anschliessend wurden die Ergebnisse vor und nach der Behandlung verglichen. Personen, die eine implantatgetragene Prothese erhalten hatten, berichteten über eine signifikante Verbesserung der Kaufähigkeit von harten und weichen Nahrungsmitteln. Die CDG2‐Gruppe berichtete auch über eine Verbesserung, die CDG1‐Gruppe jedoch konnte keine Veränderungen feststellen, ja musste teils sogar über eine Verschlechterung nach der Behandlung berichten. Trotz erwiesener grösserer Zufriedenheit mit Kaukomfort und ‐fähigkeit, vermieden es 30–50% aller Personen der Gruppen IG und CDG2 weiterhin, Nahrungsmittel wie Karotten und Äpfel zu essen. Dies lässt vermuten, dass es ohne massgeschneiderte Diätanweisungen nach erfolgreicher prothetischer Rehabilitation nicht unbedingt zu einer zufriedenstellenden Umstellung des Speisezettels kommt.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="es"><title type="main">Resumen</title><p>La pérdida de los dientes naturales compromete la eficiencia masticatoria, y los pacientes edéntulos tienen con frecuencia una dieta que es deficiente en fibra y vitaminas. Las prótesis retenidas sobre implantes ofrecen la posibilidad de superar algunas de las limitaciones de las dentaduras convencionales en términos de eficiencia masticatoria. La intención con prótesis orales resultaría en una mejora en la selección de comida en el paciente edétulo. Este estudio prospectivo implicó tres grupos, es decir, 1) sujetos que solicitaron y recibieron implantes para estabilizar una prótesis completa fija o removible (IG, n=26); 2) sujetos edéntulos que solicitaron prótesis implantosoportadas y recibieron dentaduras convencionales (CDG1, n=22), y; 3) pacientes edéntulos que solicitaron y recibieron dentaduras convencionales (CDG2, n=35). Los datos se recogieron usando cuestionarios convalidados pre y postoperatoriamente. Previo al tratamiento, se les preguntó a todos los sujetos si comían una variedad de comida dura o blanda, para indicar el grado de dificultat al masticar esas comidas y valorar su satisfacción con aspectos de sus dentaduras completas maxilares o mandibulares. Tras la terminación del tratamiento, los sujetos completaron los cuestionarios otra vez y se compararon los datos pre y postoperatorios. Los sujetos que recibieron una prótesis implantosoportada informaron sobre mejoras significativas en la masticación de comidas duras y blandas. Los sujetos CDG2 también informaron sobre mejoras, pero los sujetos CDG1 informaron que no se había producido ningún cambio o incuso que hubo deterioro tras el tratamiento. A pesar de informar sobre una mejora en la satisfacción con confort y habilidad para masticar comida, 30–50% de los sujetos IG y CDG2 aun evitaban comer alimentos tales como zanahorias y manzanas. Esto sugiere que, en ausencia de un asesoramiento dietético a medida, una dieta satisfactoria no es inevitable tras una aparentemente exitosa rehabilitación prostética.</p><p> <inlineGraphic alt="inline image" location="image_n/CLR_130313_f1.gif" href=""></inlineGraphic> </p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Food selection in edentate patients</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Finbarr</namePart><namePart type="family">Allen</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Anne</namePart><namePart type="family">McMillan</namePart><affiliation>Authors' affiliations: Finbarr Allen, Senior Lecturer/Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental School & Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.Anne McMillan, Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science, Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-06</dateIssued><edition>Accepted 30 May 2001</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">6</extent><extent unit="formulas">0</extent><extent unit="references">19</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">1</extent><extent unit="words">5241</extent></physicalDescription><abstract>Abstract: The loss of natural teeth compromises chewing efficiency, and edentulous patients often have a diet that is deficient in fibre and vitamins. Prostheses that are retained on implants offer the possibility of overcoming some of the limitations of conventional dentures in terms of chewing efficiency. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses would result in improved food selection in edentulous patients. This prospective study involved three groups, namely (i) subjects who requested and received implants to stabilise a complete fixed or removable prosthesis (IG, n = 26), (ii) edentulous subjects who requested implant prostheses, but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n = 22), and (iii) edentulous subjects who requested and received conventional dentures (CDG2, n = 35). Data were collected using validated questionnaires pre‐ and postoperatively. Prior to treatment, all subjects were asked whether they ate a variety of hard and soft foods, to indicate the degree of difficulty they experienced when chewing these foods, and to rate their satisfaction with various aspects of their maxillary and mandibular complete dentures. Following the completion of treatment, subjects completed the questionnaires again. Pre‐ and postoperative data were compared. Subjects who received implant prostheses reported significant improvement in chewing hard and soft foods. CDG2 subjects also reported improvement, but CDG1 subjects reported no change or even deterioration following treatment. Despite reported improvement in satisfaction with comfort and ability to chew food, 30–50% of IG and CDG2 subjects still avoided eating foods such as carrot and apple. This suggests that, in the absence of tailored dietary advice, apparently successful prosthetic rehabilitation does not necessarily result in a satisfactory diet.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">La perte des dents naturelles compromet l'efficacité de la mastication, et les patients édentés ont souvent une diète déficiente en fibres et en vitamines. Les prothèses sur implants peuvent aider les prothèses conventionnelles pour améliorer la mastication. Le but de cette étude a été de tester l'hypothèse selon laquelle l'amélioration de la satisfaction des prothèses buccales pouvaient induire une amélioration de la sélection de la nourriture par les patients édentés. Cette étude prospective comprenait trois groupes, c.‐à‐d. 1) des sujets qui avaient besoin et qui ont reçu des implants pour stabiliser des prothèses complètes fixées ou amovibles (IG : n=26); 2) des sujets édentés qui avaient besoin de prothèses sur implants mais qui ont reçu des prothèses conventionnelles (CDG1 : n=22) et des sujets édentés qui avaient besoin et qui ont reçu des prothèses conventionnelles (CDG2: n=35). Les données ont été collectées à l'aide de questionnaires distribués avant et après l'opération. Avant le traitement, tous les sujets ont été interrogés pour savoir s'ils mangeaient une variété de nourriture dure et tendre, afin de cerner le degré de difficulté de mastication de cette nourriture et pour quantifier leur satisfaction en vis‐à‐vis des prothèses complètes supérieures et inférieures. A la suite du traitement les sujets ont à nouveau complété un questionnaire et les données pré‐ et post‐opératoires ont été comparées. Les sujets qui avaient reçu une prothèse sur implants ont décrit une amélioration significative de la mastication de nourriture tant dure que tendre. Les sujets CDG2 avaient également une amélioration, mais les sujets CDG1 déclaraient n'obtenir ni changement ni même détérioration à la suite du traitement. Malgré l'amélioration de la satisfaction du confort et de l'habilitéà mâcher la nourriture, 30–50% des IG et CDG2 évitaient toujours de manger de la nourriture telle que des carottes ou des pommes. En l'absence d'un avis diététique ajusté une diète satisfaisante n'est donc pas impossible à la suite d'une réhabilitation prothétique apparemment réussie.</abstract><abstract lang="de">Der Verlust der eigenen Zähne beeinträchtigt die Kaufähigkeit, und zahnlose Patienten nehmen oft eine an Fasern und Vitaminen arme Diät zu sich. An Implantaten fixierte Prothesen ermöglichen es nun aber gewisse Einschränkungen in der Kaufähigkeit mit dem konventionellen Gebiss zu überwinden. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Hypothese zu testen, dass eine Verbesserung der Zufriedenheit mit Zahnprothesen sich in einer veränderten Auswahl der Nahrungsmittel eines zahnlosen Patienten zeigt. Diese Langzeitstudie schloss drei Patientengruppen ein, nähmlich 1) Personen, die zur Stabilisierung von festsitzenden oder abnehmbaren Prothesen Implantate wünschten und auch erhielten (IG, n=26); 2) zahnlose Personen, die eigentlich implantatgetragene Prothesen wünschten, aber konventionelle Gebisse erhielten (CDG1, n=22), und; 3) Personen, die konventionelle Gebisse wünschten und auch erhielten (CDG2, n=35). Die Angaben sammelte man vor und nach der Therapie mit ausgetesteten Fragekatalogen. Vor Behandlungsbeginn wurden alle Personen gebeten, verschiedene harte und weiche Nahrungsmitteln zu essen, um einerseits Schwierigkeiten festzustellen, diese Nahrungsmittel zu zerkauen, und um andererseits ihre Zufriedenheit mit den aktuellen Ober‐ und Unterkieferprothesen einzuordnen. Nach Abschluss der Behandlung füllten die Versuchspersonen den Fragekatalog nochmals aus, und anschliessend wurden die Ergebnisse vor und nach der Behandlung verglichen. Personen, die eine implantatgetragene Prothese erhalten hatten, berichteten über eine signifikante Verbesserung der Kaufähigkeit von harten und weichen Nahrungsmitteln. Die CDG2‐Gruppe berichtete auch über eine Verbesserung, die CDG1‐Gruppe jedoch konnte keine Veränderungen feststellen, ja musste teils sogar über eine Verschlechterung nach der Behandlung berichten. Trotz erwiesener grösserer Zufriedenheit mit Kaukomfort und ‐fähigkeit, vermieden es 30–50% aller Personen der Gruppen IG und CDG2 weiterhin, Nahrungsmittel wie Karotten und Äpfel zu essen. Dies lässt vermuten, dass es ohne massgeschneiderte Diätanweisungen nach erfolgreicher prothetischer Rehabilitation nicht unbedingt zu einer zufriedenstellenden Umstellung des Speisezettels kommt.</abstract><abstract lang="es">La pérdida de los dientes naturales compromete la eficiencia masticatoria, y los pacientes edéntulos tienen con frecuencia una dieta que es deficiente en fibra y vitaminas. Las prótesis retenidas sobre implantes ofrecen la posibilidad de superar algunas de las limitaciones de las dentaduras convencionales en términos de eficiencia masticatoria. La intención con prótesis orales resultaría en una mejora en la selección de comida en el paciente edétulo. Este estudio prospectivo implicó tres grupos, es decir, 1) sujetos que solicitaron y recibieron implantes para estabilizar una prótesis completa fija o removible (IG, n=26); 2) sujetos edéntulos que solicitaron prótesis implantosoportadas y recibieron dentaduras convencionales (CDG1, n=22), y; 3) pacientes edéntulos que solicitaron y recibieron dentaduras convencionales (CDG2, n=35). Los datos se recogieron usando cuestionarios convalidados pre y postoperatoriamente. Previo al tratamiento, se les preguntó a todos los sujetos si comían una variedad de comida dura o blanda, para indicar el grado de dificultat al masticar esas comidas y valorar su satisfacción con aspectos de sus dentaduras completas maxilares o mandibulares. Tras la terminación del tratamiento, los sujetos completaron los cuestionarios otra vez y se compararon los datos pre y postoperatorios. Los sujetos que recibieron una prótesis implantosoportada informaron sobre mejoras significativas en la masticación de comidas duras y blandas. Los sujetos CDG2 también informaron sobre mejoras, pero los sujetos CDG1 informaron que no se había producido ningún cambio o incuso que hubo deterioro tras el tratamiento. A pesar de informar sobre una mejora en la satisfacción con confort y habilidad para masticar comida, 30–50% de los sujetos IG y CDG2 aun evitaban comer alimentos tales como zanahorias y manzanas. Esto sugiere que, en ausencia de un asesoramiento dietético a medida, una dieta satisfactoria no es inevitable tras una aparentemente exitosa rehabilitación prostética.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>implants</topic><topic>food selection</topic><topic>mastication</topic><topic>edentulousness</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Oral Implants Research</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0905-7161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0501</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">CLR</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>320</start><end>326</end><total>7</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-CV6W9MM9-K</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130313.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">0647</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Science, Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006969 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 006969 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D48A365A5AA1835E4D2551A74EB882C6714AFE1F
|texte= Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |