Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film
Identifieur interne : 00C381 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00C380; suivant : 00C382Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film
Auteurs : Barton M. Gratt [États-Unis] ; Edward A. Sickles [États-Unis] ; Alan A. Forsythe [États-Unis]Source :
- Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology [ 0030-4220 ] ; 1987.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anatomic, Bitewing, Cassette, Conventional film packets, Dental system, Dental xeroradiography, Film packet, Film packets, Film technique, Film techniques, Greater thickness, Imaging surface, Incisor, Intraoral, Intraoral radiography, Intraoral xeroradiography, Mandibular, Mandibular incisor, Mandibular molar, Maxillary, Molar, Packet, Patient comfort, Patient discomfort, Periapical, Precision holder, Premolar, Premolar molar, Radiograph, Radiography, Rinn, Sickle, Skilled operator, Standard error, Statistical significance, Ucla school, Xeroradiograph, Xeroradiographic, Xeroradiographs, Xeroradiography, Xeroradiography cassette, Xeroradiography cassettes, Xeroradiography technique, Xerox, Xerox bitewing holder.
- Teeft :
- Anatomic, Bitewing, Cassette, Conventional film packets, Dental system, Dental xeroradiography, Film packet, Film packets, Film technique, Film techniques, Greater thickness, Imaging surface, Incisor, Intraoral, Intraoral radiography, Intraoral xeroradiography, Mandibular, Mandibular incisor, Mandibular molar, Maxillary, Molar, Packet, Patient comfort, Patient discomfort, Periapical, Precision holder, Premolar, Premolar molar, Radiograph, Radiography, Rinn, Sickle, Skilled operator, Standard error, Statistical significance, Ucla school, Xeroradiograph, Xeroradiographic, Xeroradiographs, Xeroradiography, Xeroradiography cassette, Xeroradiography cassettes, Xeroradiography technique, Xerox, Xerox bitewing holder.
Abstract
Abstract: The Xerox 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 007551
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 007551
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 005B71
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 00CB66
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 00C381
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title><author><name sortKey="Gratt, Barton M" sort="Gratt, Barton M" uniqKey="Gratt B" first="Barton M." last="Gratt">Barton M. Gratt</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sickles, Edward A" sort="Sickles, Edward A" uniqKey="Sickles E" first="Edward A." last="Sickles">Edward A. Sickles</name></author><author><name sortKey="Forsythe, Alan A" sort="Forsythe, Alan A" uniqKey="Forsythe A" first="Alan A." last="Forsythe">Alan A. Forsythe</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67</idno><date when="1987" year="1987">1987</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007551</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007551</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">007551</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">005B71</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">005B71</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0030-4220:1987:Gratt B:clinical:assessment:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00CB66</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00C381</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00C381</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title><author><name sortKey="Gratt, Barton M" sort="Gratt, Barton M" uniqKey="Gratt B" first="Barton M." last="Gratt">Barton M. Gratt</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sickles, Edward A" sort="Sickles, Edward A" uniqKey="Sickles E" first="Edward A." last="Sickles">Edward A. Sickles</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Forsythe, Alan A" sort="Forsythe, Alan A" uniqKey="Forsythe A" first="Alan A." last="Forsythe">Alan A. Forsythe</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">OSOMOP</title><idno type="ISSN">0030-4220</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1987">1987</date><biblScope unit="volume">64</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="241">241</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="248">248</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0030-4220</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0030-4220</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomic</term><term>Bitewing</term><term>Cassette</term><term>Conventional film packets</term><term>Dental system</term><term>Dental xeroradiography</term><term>Film packet</term><term>Film packets</term><term>Film technique</term><term>Film techniques</term><term>Greater thickness</term><term>Imaging surface</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Intraoral</term><term>Intraoral radiography</term><term>Intraoral xeroradiography</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular incisor</term><term>Mandibular molar</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Molar</term><term>Packet</term><term>Patient comfort</term><term>Patient discomfort</term><term>Periapical</term><term>Precision holder</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar molar</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Rinn</term><term>Sickle</term><term>Skilled operator</term><term>Standard error</term><term>Statistical significance</term><term>Ucla school</term><term>Xeroradiograph</term><term>Xeroradiographic</term><term>Xeroradiographs</term><term>Xeroradiography</term><term>Xeroradiography cassette</term><term>Xeroradiography cassettes</term><term>Xeroradiography technique</term><term>Xerox</term><term>Xerox bitewing holder</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomic</term><term>Bitewing</term><term>Cassette</term><term>Conventional film packets</term><term>Dental system</term><term>Dental xeroradiography</term><term>Film packet</term><term>Film packets</term><term>Film technique</term><term>Film techniques</term><term>Greater thickness</term><term>Imaging surface</term><term>Incisor</term><term>Intraoral</term><term>Intraoral radiography</term><term>Intraoral xeroradiography</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular incisor</term><term>Mandibular molar</term><term>Maxillary</term><term>Molar</term><term>Packet</term><term>Patient comfort</term><term>Patient discomfort</term><term>Periapical</term><term>Precision holder</term><term>Premolar</term><term>Premolar molar</term><term>Radiograph</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Rinn</term><term>Sickle</term><term>Skilled operator</term><term>Standard error</term><term>Statistical significance</term><term>Ucla school</term><term>Xeroradiograph</term><term>Xeroradiographic</term><term>Xeroradiographs</term><term>Xeroradiography</term><term>Xeroradiography cassette</term><term>Xeroradiography cassettes</term><term>Xeroradiography technique</term><term>Xerox</term><term>Xerox bitewing holder</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The Xerox 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Gratt, Barton M" sort="Gratt, Barton M" uniqKey="Gratt B" first="Barton M." last="Gratt">Barton M. Gratt</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Forsythe, Alan A" sort="Forsythe, Alan A" uniqKey="Forsythe A" first="Alan A." last="Forsythe">Alan A. Forsythe</name><name sortKey="Sickles, Edward A" sort="Sickles, Edward A" uniqKey="Sickles E" first="Edward A." last="Sickles">Edward A. Sickles</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00C381 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00C381 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67
|texte= Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |