EdenteV2, Istex, Corpus, bibRecord, 007551

Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film

Identifieur interne : 007551 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 007550; suivant : 007552

Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film

Auteurs : Barton M. Gratt ; Edward A. Sickles ; Alan A. Forsythe

Source :

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology [ 0030-4220 ] ; 1987.

RBID : ISTEX:ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: The Xerox 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gratt, Barton M" sort="Gratt, Barton M" uniqKey="Gratt B" first="Barton M." last="Gratt">Barton M. Gratt</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sickles, Edward A" sort="Sickles, Edward A" uniqKey="Sickles E" first="Edward A." last="Sickles">Edward A. Sickles</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Forsythe, Alan A" sort="Forsythe, Alan A" uniqKey="Forsythe A" first="Alan A." last="Forsythe">Alan A. Forsythe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67</idno>
<date when="1987" year="1987">1987</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">007551</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">007551</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gratt, Barton M" sort="Gratt, Barton M" uniqKey="Gratt B" first="Barton M." last="Gratt">Barton M. Gratt</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sickles, Edward A" sort="Sickles, Edward A" uniqKey="Sickles E" first="Edward A." last="Sickles">Edward A. Sickles</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Forsythe, Alan A" sort="Forsythe, Alan A" uniqKey="Forsythe A" first="Alan A." last="Forsythe">Alan A. Forsythe</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">OSOMOP</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0030-4220</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1987">1987</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">64</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="241">241</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="248">248</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0030-4220</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0030-4220</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomic</term>
<term>Bitewing</term>
<term>Cassette</term>
<term>Conventional film packets</term>
<term>Dental system</term>
<term>Dental xeroradiography</term>
<term>Film packet</term>
<term>Film packets</term>
<term>Film technique</term>
<term>Film techniques</term>
<term>Greater thickness</term>
<term>Imaging surface</term>
<term>Incisor</term>
<term>Intraoral</term>
<term>Intraoral radiography</term>
<term>Intraoral xeroradiography</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular incisor</term>
<term>Mandibular molar</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Molar</term>
<term>Packet</term>
<term>Patient comfort</term>
<term>Patient discomfort</term>
<term>Periapical</term>
<term>Precision holder</term>
<term>Premolar</term>
<term>Premolar molar</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Rinn</term>
<term>Sickle</term>
<term>Skilled operator</term>
<term>Standard error</term>
<term>Statistical significance</term>
<term>Ucla school</term>
<term>Xeroradiograph</term>
<term>Xeroradiographic</term>
<term>Xeroradiographs</term>
<term>Xeroradiography</term>
<term>Xeroradiography cassette</term>
<term>Xeroradiography cassettes</term>
<term>Xeroradiography technique</term>
<term>Xerox</term>
<term>Xerox bitewing holder</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Anatomic</term>
<term>Bitewing</term>
<term>Cassette</term>
<term>Conventional film packets</term>
<term>Dental system</term>
<term>Dental xeroradiography</term>
<term>Film packet</term>
<term>Film packets</term>
<term>Film technique</term>
<term>Film techniques</term>
<term>Greater thickness</term>
<term>Imaging surface</term>
<term>Incisor</term>
<term>Intraoral</term>
<term>Intraoral radiography</term>
<term>Intraoral xeroradiography</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Mandibular incisor</term>
<term>Mandibular molar</term>
<term>Maxillary</term>
<term>Molar</term>
<term>Packet</term>
<term>Patient comfort</term>
<term>Patient discomfort</term>
<term>Periapical</term>
<term>Precision holder</term>
<term>Premolar</term>
<term>Premolar molar</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Rinn</term>
<term>Sickle</term>
<term>Skilled operator</term>
<term>Standard error</term>
<term>Statistical significance</term>
<term>Ucla school</term>
<term>Xeroradiograph</term>
<term>Xeroradiographic</term>
<term>Xeroradiographs</term>
<term>Xeroradiography</term>
<term>Xeroradiography cassette</term>
<term>Xeroradiography cassettes</term>
<term>Xeroradiography technique</term>
<term>Xerox</term>
<term>Xerox bitewing holder</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The Xerox 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName>
<keywords><teeft><json:string>xeroradiography</json:string>
<json:string>cassette</json:string>
<json:string>intraoral</json:string>
<json:string>bitewing</json:string>
<json:string>premolar</json:string>
<json:string>maxillary</json:string>
<json:string>incisor</json:string>
<json:string>mandibular</json:string>
<json:string>rinn</json:string>
<json:string>molar</json:string>
<json:string>radiograph</json:string>
<json:string>periapical</json:string>
<json:string>xeroradiographic</json:string>
<json:string>xeroradiograph</json:string>
<json:string>anatomic</json:string>
<json:string>xerox</json:string>
<json:string>xeroradiographs</json:string>
<json:string>sickle</json:string>
<json:string>premolar molar</json:string>
<json:string>film packet</json:string>
<json:string>patient comfort</json:string>
<json:string>xeroradiography cassette</json:string>
<json:string>film packets</json:string>
<json:string>radiography</json:string>
<json:string>intraoral xeroradiography</json:string>
<json:string>standard error</json:string>
<json:string>mandibular incisor</json:string>
<json:string>intraoral radiography</json:string>
<json:string>film techniques</json:string>
<json:string>mandibular molar</json:string>
<json:string>skilled operator</json:string>
<json:string>xeroradiography technique</json:string>
<json:string>film technique</json:string>
<json:string>xerox bitewing holder</json:string>
<json:string>precision holder</json:string>
<json:string>greater thickness</json:string>
<json:string>patient discomfort</json:string>
<json:string>dental system</json:string>
<json:string>dental xeroradiography</json:string>
<json:string>statistical significance</json:string>
<json:string>xeroradiography cassettes</json:string>
<json:string>ucla school</json:string>
<json:string>conventional film packets</json:string>
<json:string>imaging surface</json:string>
<json:string>packet</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author><json:item><name>Barton M. Gratt</name>
<affiliations><json:string>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Edward A. Sickles</name>
<affiliations><json:string>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Alan A. Forsythe</name>
<affiliations><json:string>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Dental radiology</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-99D0NQT7-9</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Abstract: The Xerox 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>6.495</score>
<pdfWordCount>3067</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>21911</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>576.28 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>119</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>856</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>1</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title>
<pmid><json:string>3476902</json:string>
</pmid>
<pii><json:string>0030-4220(87)90097-1</json:string>
</pii>
<genre><json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<publicationDate>1987</publicationDate>
<issn><json:string>0030-4220</json:string>
</issn>
<pii><json:string>S0030-4220(00)X0043-6</json:string>
</pii>
<volume>64</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<pages><first>241</first>
<last>248</last>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1987</json:string>
</date>
<geogName><json:string>Ill</json:string>
</geogName>
<orgName><json:string>Grant DE</json:string>
<json:string>Isaac Masel Co., Philadelphia</json:string>
<json:string>Xerox Medical Systems, Pasadena</json:string>
<json:string>Green Inc.</json:string>
<json:string>Rinn Corp.</json:string>
<json:string>General Electric Co.</json:string>
<json:string>Xerox Medical Systems</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder><json:string>Grant DE</json:string>
</orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName><json:string>Study</json:string>
<json:string>I. Use</json:string>
<json:string>Alan A. Forsythe</json:string>
<json:string>I.Use</json:string>
<json:string>Edward A. Sickles</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName><json:string>Calif</json:string>
<json:string>LOS ANGELES</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl></ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-99D0NQT7-9</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><wos></wos>
<scienceMetrix></scienceMetrix>
<scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>3 - General Dentistry</json:string>
<json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Pathology and Forensic Medicine</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string>
<json:string>2 - sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string>
<json:string>3 - sciences medicales</json:string>
<json:string>4 - anesthesie. reanimation. transfusion. therapie cellulaire et therapie genique</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1987</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1987</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1</json:string>
</doi>
<id>ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<availability><p>ELSEVIER</p>
</availability>
<date>1987</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note>This study was funded in part by Grant DE-06379 from the National Institutes of Dental Research, United States Public Health Service, Bethesda, Md.</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Barton M.</forename>
<surname>Gratt</surname>
</persName>
<note type="biography">Reprint requests to: Dr. Barton M. Gratt UCLA School of Dentistry Los Angeles, CA 90024</note>
<note type="biography">UCLA School of Dentistry.</note>
<affiliation>Reprint requests to: Dr. Barton M. Gratt UCLA School of Dentistry Los Angeles, CA 90024</affiliation>
<affiliation>UCLA School of Dentistry.</affiliation>
<affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Edward A.</forename>
<surname>Sickles</surname>
</persName>
<note type="biography">UCSF School of Medicine.</note>
<affiliation>UCSF School of Medicine.</affiliation>
<affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Alan A.</forename>
<surname>Forsythe</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1</idno>
<idno type="PII">0030-4220(87)90097-1</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j">Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">OSOMOP</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0030-4220</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0030-4220(00)X0043-6</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1987"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">64</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="241">241</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="248">248</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><creation><date>1987</date>
</creation>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The Xerox 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>article-category</head>
<item><term>Dental radiology</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="1987">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>OSOMOP</jid>
<aid>87900971</aid>
<ce:pii>0030-4220(87)90097-1</ce:pii>
<ce:doi>10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1</ce:doi>
<ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1987"></ce:copyright>
<ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Dental radiology</ce:text>
</ce:doctopic>
</ce:doctopics>
</item-info>
<head><ce:article-footnote><ce:label>☆</ce:label>
<ce:note-para>This study was funded in part by Grant DE-06379 from the National Institutes of Dental Research, United States Public Health Service, Bethesda, Md.</ce:note-para>
</ce:article-footnote>
<ce:title>Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</ce:title>
<ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Barton M.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Gratt</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>2</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="FN1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:author><ce:given-name>Edward A.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Sickles</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>2</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="FN2"><ce:sup>∗∗</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:author><ce:given-name>Alan A.</ce:given-name>
<ce:surname>Forsythe</ce:surname>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
<ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>2</ce:sup>
</ce:cross-ref>
</ce:author>
<ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>1</ce:label>
<ce:textfn>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</ce:textfn>
</ce:affiliation>
<ce:affiliation id="AFF2"><ce:label>2</ce:label>
<ce:textfn>University of California San Francisco San Francisco, Calif., USA</ce:textfn>
</ce:affiliation>
<ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>1</ce:label>
<ce:text><ce:italic>Reprint requests to:</ce:italic>
 Dr. Barton M. Gratt UCLA School of Dentistry Los Angeles, CA 90024</ce:text>
</ce:correspondence>
<ce:footnote id="FN1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label>
<ce:note-para>UCLA School of Dentistry.</ce:note-para>
</ce:footnote>
<ce:footnote id="FN2"><ce:label>∗∗</ce:label>
<ce:note-para>UCSF School of Medicine.</ce:note-para>
</ce:footnote>
</ce:author-group>
<ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title>
<ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>The <ce:italic>Xerox</ce:italic>
 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.</ce:simple-para>
</ce:abstract-sec>
</ce:abstract>
</head>
</converted-article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Barton M.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gratt</namePart>
<affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</affiliation>
<description>Reprint requests to: Dr. Barton M. Gratt UCLA School of Dentistry Los Angeles, CA 90024</description>
<description>UCLA School of Dentistry.</description>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Edward A.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sickles</namePart>
<affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</affiliation>
<description>UCSF School of Medicine.</description>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Alan A.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Forsythe</namePart>
<affiliation>University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, USA</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1987</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1987</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">Abstract: The Xerox 110 dental system employs rigid beveled-edge cassettes containing charged selenium-alloy plates for intraoral xeroradiography. This study evaluates the ability of a skilled operator to position these cassettes accurately within the oral cavity as compared to the ability to position conventional film packets using two types of image holders. Results indicate that xeroradiographic cassettes are significantly more difficult to use for complete-mouth radiographs than comparable conventional film packets. Also, the use of xeroradiographic cassettes causes a slight increase in patient discomfort. In addition, two types of rectangular collimating devices were shown to be useful. The greatest shortcoming of the xeroradiographic cassette is not its greater thickness or rigidity but the reduced dimensions of its internal surface area.</abstract>
<note>This study was funded in part by Grant DE-06379 from the National Institutes of Dental Research, United States Public Health Service, Bethesda, Md.</note>
<subject><genre>article-category</genre>
<topic>Dental radiology</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>OSOMOP</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">198708</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<identifier type="ISSN">0030-4220</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0030-4220(00)X0043-6</identifier>
<part><date>198708</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>64</number>
<caption>vol.</caption>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><number>2</number>
<caption>no.</caption>
</detail>
<extent unit="issue-pages"><start>A3</start>
<end>A14</end>
</extent>
<extent unit="issue-pages"><start>135</start>
<end>268</end>
</extent>
<extent unit="pages"><start>241</start>
<end>248</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-99D0NQT7-9</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0030-4220(87)90097-1</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">0030-4220(87)90097-1</identifier>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007551 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 007551 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:ECE0009079F3C669D42BEF995A5F7F835B9BCB67
   |texte=   Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film

Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: A comparison of xeroradiography versus film

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri