No clear trend for differences in implant-failure rates between tooth-implant–connected prostheses and freestanding implant–supported prostheses
Identifieur interne : 008938 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 008937; suivant : 008939No clear trend for differences in implant-failure rates between tooth-implant–connected prostheses and freestanding implant–supported prostheses
Auteurs :Source :
- Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice [ 1532-3382 ] ; 2001.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Droit d'auteur.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Better evidence, Catholic university, Clear trend, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Clinical situation, Cohort, Cohort study summary subjects, Common challenge, Confounder, Content reviewer, Copyright, Cumulative success rate, Dental practice volume, Denture, Duyck, Edentulous patients, Ences, Evid, Evid base dent pract copyright, Freestanding, Freestanding group, Freestanding implant prostheses, Freestanding prostheses, Freestanding prostheses none, Future studies, Groups interval, Hosny, Hujoel, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant failure, Implant failure rates, Implant failures, Implant research, Implant survival, Implantsupported, Implantsupported prostheses, Infec, Interval success rate, January, July, Keith phillips, Large sample sizes, Leuven, Lifetime table, Luat, Main outcome measure, Main outcome measure implant failure, Main results, Many controversies, Mosby, Multiple centers, Naert, Nonsignificant, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Partial prosthesis, Periapical, Periapical radiolucency, Periodontology, Pract, Prosthesis, Prosthesis placement, Prosthodontics, Radiolucency, Relevant questions, Reliable information, Research collaborations, Seattle naert, Seattle philippe hujoel, Significant differences, Single research centers, Smoker, Smoking data, Statistical significance, Steenberghe, Study need, Test group, Tion.
- Teeft :
- Better evidence, Catholic university, Clear trend, Clin, Clinical evaluation, Clinical situation, Cohort, Cohort study summary subjects, Common challenge, Confounder, Content reviewer, Copyright, Cumulative success rate, Dental practice volume, Denture, Duyck, Edentulous patients, Ences, Evid, Evid base dent pract copyright, Freestanding, Freestanding group, Freestanding implant prostheses, Freestanding prostheses, Freestanding prostheses none, Future studies, Groups interval, Hosny, Hujoel, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant failure, Implant failure rates, Implant failures, Implant research, Implant survival, Implantsupported, Implantsupported prostheses, Infec, Interval success rate, January, July, Keith phillips, Large sample sizes, Leuven, Lifetime table, Luat, Main outcome measure, Main outcome measure implant failure, Main results, Many controversies, Mosby, Multiple centers, Naert, Nonsignificant, Partial denture, Partial dentures, Partial prosthesis, Periapical, Periapical radiolucency, Periodontology, Pract, Prosthesis, Prosthesis placement, Prosthodontics, Radiolucency, Relevant questions, Reliable information, Research collaborations, Seattle naert, Seattle philippe hujoel, Significant differences, Single research centers, Smoker, Smoking data, Statistical significance, Steenberghe, Study need, Test group, Tion.
Abstract
Abstract: J Evid Base Dent Pract 2001;1:176-7
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S1532-3382(01)70039-5
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 003231
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 003231
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003B53
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 008C67
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 008938
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">No clear trend for differences in implant-failure rates between tooth-implant–connected prostheses and freestanding implant–supported prostheses</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:661771BA28FAA4C30C7356C9D2365C4391A38EB3</idno>
<date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S1532-3382(01)70039-5</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/661771BA28FAA4C30C7356C9D2365C4391A38EB3/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003231</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003231</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003231</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003B53</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003B53</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008C67</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008938</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">008938</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">No clear trend for differences in implant-failure rates between tooth-implant–connected prostheses and freestanding implant–supported prostheses</title>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMED</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1532-3382</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2001">2001</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="176">176</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="177">177</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1532-3382</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1532-3382</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Better evidence</term>
<term>Catholic university</term>
<term>Clear trend</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Clinical situation</term>
<term>Cohort</term>
<term>Cohort study summary subjects</term>
<term>Common challenge</term>
<term>Confounder</term>
<term>Content reviewer</term>
<term>Copyright</term>
<term>Cumulative success rate</term>
<term>Dental practice volume</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Duyck</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Ences</term>
<term>Evid</term>
<term>Evid base dent pract copyright</term>
<term>Freestanding</term>
<term>Freestanding group</term>
<term>Freestanding implant prostheses</term>
<term>Freestanding prostheses</term>
<term>Freestanding prostheses none</term>
<term>Future studies</term>
<term>Groups interval</term>
<term>Hosny</term>
<term>Hujoel</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant failure rates</term>
<term>Implant failures</term>
<term>Implant research</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implantsupported</term>
<term>Implantsupported prostheses</term>
<term>Infec</term>
<term>Interval success rate</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>July</term>
<term>Keith phillips</term>
<term>Large sample sizes</term>
<term>Leuven</term>
<term>Lifetime table</term>
<term>Luat</term>
<term>Main outcome measure</term>
<term>Main outcome measure implant failure</term>
<term>Main results</term>
<term>Many controversies</term>
<term>Mosby</term>
<term>Multiple centers</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Nonsignificant</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Partial prosthesis</term>
<term>Periapical</term>
<term>Periapical radiolucency</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Pract</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthesis placement</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Radiolucency</term>
<term>Relevant questions</term>
<term>Reliable information</term>
<term>Research collaborations</term>
<term>Seattle naert</term>
<term>Seattle philippe hujoel</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Single research centers</term>
<term>Smoker</term>
<term>Smoking data</term>
<term>Statistical significance</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Study need</term>
<term>Test group</term>
<term>Tion</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Better evidence</term>
<term>Catholic university</term>
<term>Clear trend</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clinical evaluation</term>
<term>Clinical situation</term>
<term>Cohort</term>
<term>Cohort study summary subjects</term>
<term>Common challenge</term>
<term>Confounder</term>
<term>Content reviewer</term>
<term>Copyright</term>
<term>Cumulative success rate</term>
<term>Dental practice volume</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Duyck</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Ences</term>
<term>Evid</term>
<term>Evid base dent pract copyright</term>
<term>Freestanding</term>
<term>Freestanding group</term>
<term>Freestanding implant prostheses</term>
<term>Freestanding prostheses</term>
<term>Freestanding prostheses none</term>
<term>Future studies</term>
<term>Groups interval</term>
<term>Hosny</term>
<term>Hujoel</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant dentistry</term>
<term>Implant failure</term>
<term>Implant failure rates</term>
<term>Implant failures</term>
<term>Implant research</term>
<term>Implant survival</term>
<term>Implantsupported</term>
<term>Implantsupported prostheses</term>
<term>Infec</term>
<term>Interval success rate</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>July</term>
<term>Keith phillips</term>
<term>Large sample sizes</term>
<term>Leuven</term>
<term>Lifetime table</term>
<term>Luat</term>
<term>Main outcome measure</term>
<term>Main outcome measure implant failure</term>
<term>Main results</term>
<term>Many controversies</term>
<term>Mosby</term>
<term>Multiple centers</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Nonsignificant</term>
<term>Partial denture</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Partial prosthesis</term>
<term>Periapical</term>
<term>Periapical radiolucency</term>
<term>Periodontology</term>
<term>Pract</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthesis placement</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Radiolucency</term>
<term>Relevant questions</term>
<term>Reliable information</term>
<term>Research collaborations</term>
<term>Seattle naert</term>
<term>Seattle philippe hujoel</term>
<term>Significant differences</term>
<term>Single research centers</term>
<term>Smoker</term>
<term>Smoking data</term>
<term>Statistical significance</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Study need</term>
<term>Test group</term>
<term>Tion</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Droit d'auteur</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: J Evid Base Dent Pract 2001;1:176-7</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list></list>
<tree></tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008938 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 008938 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:661771BA28FAA4C30C7356C9D2365C4391A38EB3 |texte= No clear trend for differences in implant-failure rates between tooth-implant–connected prostheses and freestanding implant–supported prostheses }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |