EdenteV2, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 004F31

Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?

Identifieur interne : 004F31 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004F30; suivant : 004F32

Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?

Auteurs : Annalisa Coliva

Source :

Philosophical Investigations [ 0190-0536 ] ; 2010-01.

RBID : ISTEX:4C3B27EC271FFC4224D898B1FBA6FB217ED5E3AB

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Alternative epistemic method, Annalisa, Annalisa coliva, Azande, Basic beliefs, Bigger area, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Boghossian, Certain beliefs, Certain facts, Certain phenomenon, Certain propositions, Characteristic feature, Coliva, Conceptual relativism, Conceptual schemes, Deviant community, Different communities, Different community, Different concept, Different epistemic practice, Different hinges, Different logic, Different ones, Different system, Different systems, Empirical evidence, Empirical propositions, Empirical questions, Epistemic, Epistemic practices, Epistemic rationality, Epistemic relativist, Epistemic system, Everyday life, Factual epistemic relativist, Family resemblance, Golden bough, Hinge, Human beings, Incompatible epistemic systems, Italics mine, Language games, Little wood, Long time, Marconi, Metaphysical possibility, More wood, Negative answer, Other areas, Other ones, Oxford university press, Page reference, Palgrave macmillan, Philosophical investigations, Philosophical review, Rational considerations, Rational persuasion, Rationality, Relativism, Relativist, Relativist interpretations, Relativist readings, Religious attitude, Religious elements, Saudade, Something animal, Striking feature, Virtual epistemic relativist, Virtual relativism, Virtual relativist, Widespread agreement, Winch, Witch doctor, Witch doctors, Wittgenstein.
Teeft :
- Alternative epistemic method, Annalisa, Annalisa coliva, Azande, Basic beliefs, Bigger area, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Boghossian, Certain beliefs, Certain facts, Certain phenomenon, Certain propositions, Characteristic feature, Coliva, Conceptual relativism, Conceptual schemes, Deviant community, Different communities, Different community, Different concept, Different epistemic practice, Different hinges, Different logic, Different ones, Different system, Different systems, Empirical evidence, Empirical propositions, Empirical questions, Epistemic, Epistemic practices, Epistemic rationality, Epistemic relativist, Epistemic system, Everyday life, Factual epistemic relativist, Family resemblance, Golden bough, Hinge, Human beings, Incompatible epistemic systems, Italics mine, Language games, Little wood, Long time, Marconi, Metaphysical possibility, More wood, Negative answer, Other areas, Other ones, Oxford university press, Page reference, Palgrave macmillan, Philosophical investigations, Philosophical review, Rational considerations, Rational persuasion, Rationality, Relativism, Relativist, Relativist interpretations, Relativist readings, Religious attitude, Religious elements, Saudade, Something animal, Striking feature, Virtual epistemic relativist, Virtual relativism, Virtual relativist, Widespread agreement, Winch, Witch doctor, Witch doctors, Wittgenstein.

Abstract

The paper reviews the grounds for relativist interpretations of Wittgenstein's later thought, especially in On Certainty. It distinguishes between factual and virtual forms of epistemic relativism and argues that, on closer inspection, Wittgenstein's notes don't support any form of relativism – let it be factual or virtual. In passing, it considers also so‐called “naturalist” readings of On Certainty, which may lend support to a relativist interpretation of Wittgenstein's ideas, finds them wanting, and recommends to interpret his positive proposal in On Certainty as a form of “internal rationalism.”

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/4C3B27EC271FFC4224D898B1FBA6FB217ED5E3AB/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2009.01394.x

Affiliations:

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002540
to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002540
to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001A33
to stream Main, to step Merge: 004F72
to stream Main, to step Curation: 004F31

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Coliva, Annalisa" sort="Coliva, Annalisa" uniqKey="Coliva A" first="Annalisa" last="Coliva">Annalisa Coliva</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4C3B27EC271FFC4224D898B1FBA6FB217ED5E3AB</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9205.2009.01394.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4C3B27EC271FFC4224D898B1FBA6FB217ED5E3AB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002540</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002540</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002540</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001A33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001A33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0190-0536:2010:Coliva A:was:wittgenstein:an</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004F72</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004F31</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004F31</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?<ref type="note" target="#fn1"><hi rend="superscript">1</hi>
</ref>
</title>
<author><name sortKey="Coliva, Annalisa" sort="Coliva, Annalisa" uniqKey="Coliva A" first="Annalisa" last="Coliva">Annalisa Coliva</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Correspondence address: Dipartimento di Scienze del linguaggio e della culturaFacoltà di Lettere e FilosofiaLargo Sant'Eufemia 1941100 ModenaItaly</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Philosophical Investigations</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0190-0536</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-9205</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">33</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="23">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">25</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-01">2010-01</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0190-0536</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0190-0536</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alternative epistemic method</term>
<term>Annalisa</term>
<term>Annalisa coliva</term>
<term>Azande</term>
<term>Basic beliefs</term>
<term>Bigger area</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Boghossian</term>
<term>Certain beliefs</term>
<term>Certain facts</term>
<term>Certain phenomenon</term>
<term>Certain propositions</term>
<term>Characteristic feature</term>
<term>Coliva</term>
<term>Conceptual relativism</term>
<term>Conceptual schemes</term>
<term>Deviant community</term>
<term>Different communities</term>
<term>Different community</term>
<term>Different concept</term>
<term>Different epistemic practice</term>
<term>Different hinges</term>
<term>Different logic</term>
<term>Different ones</term>
<term>Different system</term>
<term>Different systems</term>
<term>Empirical evidence</term>
<term>Empirical propositions</term>
<term>Empirical questions</term>
<term>Epistemic</term>
<term>Epistemic practices</term>
<term>Epistemic rationality</term>
<term>Epistemic relativist</term>
<term>Epistemic system</term>
<term>Everyday life</term>
<term>Factual epistemic relativist</term>
<term>Family resemblance</term>
<term>Golden bough</term>
<term>Hinge</term>
<term>Human beings</term>
<term>Incompatible epistemic systems</term>
<term>Italics mine</term>
<term>Language games</term>
<term>Little wood</term>
<term>Long time</term>
<term>Marconi</term>
<term>Metaphysical possibility</term>
<term>More wood</term>
<term>Negative answer</term>
<term>Other areas</term>
<term>Other ones</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Page reference</term>
<term>Palgrave macmillan</term>
<term>Philosophical investigations</term>
<term>Philosophical review</term>
<term>Rational considerations</term>
<term>Rational persuasion</term>
<term>Rationality</term>
<term>Relativism</term>
<term>Relativist</term>
<term>Relativist interpretations</term>
<term>Relativist readings</term>
<term>Religious attitude</term>
<term>Religious elements</term>
<term>Saudade</term>
<term>Something animal</term>
<term>Striking feature</term>
<term>Virtual epistemic relativist</term>
<term>Virtual relativism</term>
<term>Virtual relativist</term>
<term>Widespread agreement</term>
<term>Winch</term>
<term>Witch doctor</term>
<term>Witch doctors</term>
<term>Wittgenstein</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Alternative epistemic method</term>
<term>Annalisa</term>
<term>Annalisa coliva</term>
<term>Azande</term>
<term>Basic beliefs</term>
<term>Bigger area</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Boghossian</term>
<term>Certain beliefs</term>
<term>Certain facts</term>
<term>Certain phenomenon</term>
<term>Certain propositions</term>
<term>Characteristic feature</term>
<term>Coliva</term>
<term>Conceptual relativism</term>
<term>Conceptual schemes</term>
<term>Deviant community</term>
<term>Different communities</term>
<term>Different community</term>
<term>Different concept</term>
<term>Different epistemic practice</term>
<term>Different hinges</term>
<term>Different logic</term>
<term>Different ones</term>
<term>Different system</term>
<term>Different systems</term>
<term>Empirical evidence</term>
<term>Empirical propositions</term>
<term>Empirical questions</term>
<term>Epistemic</term>
<term>Epistemic practices</term>
<term>Epistemic rationality</term>
<term>Epistemic relativist</term>
<term>Epistemic system</term>
<term>Everyday life</term>
<term>Factual epistemic relativist</term>
<term>Family resemblance</term>
<term>Golden bough</term>
<term>Hinge</term>
<term>Human beings</term>
<term>Incompatible epistemic systems</term>
<term>Italics mine</term>
<term>Language games</term>
<term>Little wood</term>
<term>Long time</term>
<term>Marconi</term>
<term>Metaphysical possibility</term>
<term>More wood</term>
<term>Negative answer</term>
<term>Other areas</term>
<term>Other ones</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Page reference</term>
<term>Palgrave macmillan</term>
<term>Philosophical investigations</term>
<term>Philosophical review</term>
<term>Rational considerations</term>
<term>Rational persuasion</term>
<term>Rationality</term>
<term>Relativism</term>
<term>Relativist</term>
<term>Relativist interpretations</term>
<term>Relativist readings</term>
<term>Religious attitude</term>
<term>Religious elements</term>
<term>Saudade</term>
<term>Something animal</term>
<term>Striking feature</term>
<term>Virtual epistemic relativist</term>
<term>Virtual relativism</term>
<term>Virtual relativist</term>
<term>Widespread agreement</term>
<term>Winch</term>
<term>Witch doctor</term>
<term>Witch doctors</term>
<term>Wittgenstein</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The paper reviews the grounds for relativist interpretations of Wittgenstein's later thought, especially in On Certainty. It distinguishes between factual and virtual forms of epistemic relativism and argues that, on closer inspection, Wittgenstein's notes don't support any form of relativism – let it be factual or virtual. In passing, it considers also so‐called “naturalist” readings of On Certainty, which may lend support to a relativist interpretation of Wittgenstein's ideas, finds them wanting, and recommends to interpret his positive proposal in On Certainty as a form of “internal rationalism.”</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list></list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Coliva, Annalisa" sort="Coliva, Annalisa" uniqKey="Coliva A" first="Annalisa" last="Coliva">Annalisa Coliva</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004F31 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004F31 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:4C3B27EC271FFC4224D898B1FBA6FB217ED5E3AB
   |texte=   Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?

Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri